Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:34:49.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On disjointness of dynamical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. Auslander  and
Y. N. Dowker
J. Auslander
Affiliation:
University of Maryland and Imperial College, University of London
Y. N. Dowker
Affiliation:
University of Maryland and Imperial College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By a dynamical system we mean one of several related objects: measure preserving transformations on probability spaces (processes), self homeomorphisms of compact metric spaces (compact systems), or a combination of these, namely compact systems provided with invariant Borel probability measures. It is the latter, which we call compact processes, which will be of most interest in this paper. In particular, we will study the dynamical properties of the product of two processes with respect to compatible measures – those measures which project to the given measures on the component spaces. This leads to the notion of disjointness of two processes – the only compatible measure is the product measure. As an application we obtain a theorem, a special case of which gives rise to a class of transformations which preserve normal sequences. Finally, we study a topological analog (topological disjointness) and briefly consider the relation between the two notions of disjointness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 477 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Furstenberg, H.Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in diophantine approximation. Mathematical Systems Theory 1, (1967), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Kryloff, N. and Bogoliuboff, N.La théorie générale de la mesure dans son application à l'étude des systèmes dynamiques de la mécanique non linéare. Ann. of Math. 38, (1937), 65–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Ornstein, D. S. and Weiss, B.Finitely determined implies very weak Bernoulli, Israel. J. Math. 17, (1974), 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Oxtoby, J. C.Ergodic sets. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 58, (1952), 116–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Weiss, B. Normal sequences as collectives. Proc. symp. on Topological Dynamics and Ergodic Theory. University of Kentucky, 1971, pp. 79–80.Google Scholar