Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:22:12.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mutant knots with symmetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

H. R. MORTON
H. R. MORTON*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Peach Street, Liverpool L69 7ZL. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mutant knots, in the sense of Conway, are known to share the same Homfly polynomial. Their 2-string satellites also share the same Homfly polynomial, but in general their m-string satellites can have different Homfly polynomials for m > 2. We show that, under conditions of extra symmetry on the constituent 2-tangles, the directed m-string satellites of mutants share the same Homfly polynomial for m < 6 in general, and for all choices of m when the satellite is based on a cable knot pattern.

We give examples of mutants with extra symmetry whose Homfly polynomials of some 6-string satellites are different, by comparing their quantum sl(3) invariants.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 146 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 95 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Aiston, A. K. and Morton, H. R.Idempotents of Hecke algebras of type A. J. Knot Theory Ramifications 7 (1998), 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Carbonara, J. O., Remmel, J. B. and Yang, M. Exact formulas for the plethysm s 2[s (1a; b)] and s 12[s (1a; b)]. Technical report, Mathematical Sciences Institute, Cornell University (1992).Google Scholar
[3]Lukac, S. G. Homfly skeins and the Hopf link. PhD. thesis, University of Liverpool (2001).Google Scholar
[4]Morton, H. R. and Cromwell, P. R.Distinguishing mutants by knot polynomials. J. Knot Theory Ramifications 5 (1996), 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Morton, H. R. and Manchon, P. M. G. Geometrical relations and plethysms in the Homfly skein of the annulus. Preprint, University of Liverpool (2007).Google Scholar
[6]Morton, H. R. and Ryder, H. J. Mutants and SU(3)q invariants. In ‘Geometry and Topology Monographs’, Vol.1: The Epstein Birthday Schrift. (1998), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Morton, H. R. and Traczyk, P.The Jones polynomial of satellite links around mutants. In ‘Braids’, ed. S. Birman and A. Libgober. Contemp. Math. 78, Amer. Math. Soc. (1988), 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Ochiai, M. and Morimura, N. Base tangle decompositions of n-string tangles with 1 < n < 10. Preprint (University of Nara, 2006).Google Scholar
[9]Rosso, M. and Jones, V. F. R.On the invariants of torus knots derived from quantum groups. J. Knot Theory Ramifications 2 (1993), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Stembridge, J. R. A Maple package for symmetric functions. Version 2.4, (2005), University of Michigan, www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~jrs.Google Scholar
[11]Turaev, V. G. Quantum invariants of knots and 3-manifolds. De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 18 (Walter de Gruyter and Co., 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar