Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:45:50.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maximally and non-maximally fast escaping points of transcendental entire functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2015

D. J. SIXSMITH
D. J. SIXSMITH*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We partition the fast escaping set of a transcendental entire function into two subsets, the maximally fast escaping set and the non-maximally fast escaping set. These sets are shown to have strong dynamical properties. We show that the intersection of the Julia set with the non-maximally fast escaping set is never empty. The proof uses a new covering result for annuli, which is of wider interest.

It was shown by Rippon and Stallard that the fast escaping set has no bounded components. In contrast, by studying a function considered by Hardy, we give an example of a transcendental entire function for which the maximally and non-maximally fast escaping sets each have uncountably many singleton components.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 158 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 365 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Baker, I. N.Multiply connected domains of normality in iteration theory. Math. Z. 81 (1963), 206–214.Google Scholar
[2]Baker, I. N.Wandering domains in the iteration of entire functions. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 49 3 (1984), 563–576.Google Scholar
[3]Bergweiler, W.Iteration of meromorphic functions. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 29 2 (1993), 151–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bergweiler, W.An entire function with simply and multiply connected wandering domains. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 7 2 (2011), 107–120.Google Scholar
[5]Bergweiler, W. and Hinkkanen, A.On semiconjugation of entire functions. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 126 3 (1999), 565–574.Google Scholar
[6]Carleson, L. and Gamelin, T. W.Complex dynamics. Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993).Google Scholar
[7]Eremenko, A. E.On the iteration of entire functions. Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory (Warsaw 1986) 23 (1989), 339–345.Google Scholar
[8]Hardy, G. H.The maximum modulus of an integral function. Quarterly J. Math. 41 (1909), 1–9.Google Scholar
[9]Hayman, W. K.Subharmonic functions. Vol. 2, vol. 20 of London Math. Soc. Monogr.. (Academic Press Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], London, 1989).Google Scholar
[10]Herring, M. E.Mapping properties of Fatou components. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 23 2 (1998), 263–274.Google Scholar
[11]Hurewicz, W. and Wallman, H.Dimension Theory. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1948).Google Scholar
[12]Osborne, J.The structure of spider's web fast escaping sets. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 44 3 (2012), 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Osborne, J.Connectedness properties of the set where the iterates of an entire function are bounded. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 155 3 (2013), 391–410.Google Scholar
[14]Rempe, L.The escaping set of the exponential. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 30 2 (2010), 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Rippon, P. and Stallard, G. M. Annular itineraries for entire functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. electronically published on June 26, 2014, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-2014-06354-X (to appear in print) (2014).Google Scholar
[16]Rippon, P. J. and Stallard, G. M.Escaping points of meromorphic functions with a finite number of poles. J. Anal. Math. 96 (2005), 225–245.Google Scholar
[17]Rippon, P. J. and Stallard, G. M.On questions of Fatou and Eremenko. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 133 4 (2005), 1119–1126.Google Scholar
[18]Rippon, P. J. and Stallard, G. M.Escaping points of entire functions of small growth. Math. Z. 261 3 (2009), 557–570.Google Scholar
[19]Rippon, P. J. and Stallard, G. M.Functions of small growth with no unbounded Fatou components. J. Anal. Math. 108 (2009), 61–86.Google Scholar
[20]Rippon, P. J. and Stallard, G. M.Slow escaping points of meromorphic functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 363 8 (2011), 4171–4201.Google Scholar
[21]Rippon, P. J. and Stallard, G. M.Fast escaping points of entire functions. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 105 4 (2012), 787–820.Google Scholar
[22]Rippon, P. J. and Stallard, G. M.Baker's conjecture and Eremenko's conjecture for functions with negative zeros. J. Anal. Math. 120 (2013), 291–309.Google Scholar
[23]Sixsmith, D. J.Entire functions for which the escaping set is a spider's web. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 151 3 (2011), 551–571.Google Scholar
[24]Sixsmith, D. J.Simply connected fast escaping Fatou components. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 8 4 (2012), 1029–1046.Google Scholar
[25]Sixsmith, D. J.On fundamental loops and the fast escaping set. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 88 3 (2013), 716–736.Google Scholar
[26]Tyler, T. F.Maximum curves and isolated points of entire functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 9 (2000), 2561–2568.Google Scholar
[27]Valiron, G.Lectures on the General Theory of Integral Functions. (Chelsea, 1949).Google Scholar