Article contents
Geometric characterization of separable second-order differential equations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Abstract
We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the separability of a system of second-order differential equations into independent one-dimensional second-order equations. The characterization of this property is given in terms of geometrical objects which are directly related to the system and relatively easy to compute. The proof of the main theorem is constructive and thus yields a practical procedure for constructing coordinates in which the system decouples.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 113 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 205 - 224
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1993
References
REFERENCES
‘1’Cartñena, J. F. and Martínez, E.. Generalized Jacobi equation and inverse problem in classical mechanics. In Integral Systems, Solid State Physics and Theory of Phase Transitions. Part 2: Symmetries and Algebraic Structures in Physics (Nova Science Publishers), pp. 59–64.Google Scholar
‘2’Douglas, J.. Solution of the inverse problem of the calculus of variations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 50 (1941), 71–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘3’Ferrario, C., Vecchio, G. Lo. Marmo, G. and Moranni, G., Separability of completely integrable dynamical systems admitting alternative Lagrangian descriptions. Lett. Math. Phys. 9 (1985), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘4’Ferrario, C., Vecchio, G. Lo, Marmo, G. and Morandi, C., A separability theorem for dynamical systems admitting alternative Lagrangians. J. Phys. A 20 (1987), 3225–3236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘5’Frölicher, A. and Nijenhuis, A.. Theory of vector valued differential forms. Proc. K. Ned. Acad. Wetensch. A 59 (1956), 338–359.Google Scholar
‘6’Hojman, R. and Ramos, S.. Two-dimensional S-equivalent Lagrangians and separability. J. Phys. A 15 (1982), 3475–3480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘7’Kossowski, M. and Thompson, C.. Submersive second-order differential equations. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 110 (1991), 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘8’Marmo, C.. Nijenhuis operators in classical dynamics. Seminar on group theoretical methods in Physics, USSR Academy of Sciences, Yurmala (1985).Google Scholar
‘9’Martínez, E., Carriñena, J. F. and Sarlet, W.. Derivations of differential forms along the tangent bundle projection. Differential Geom. Appl. 2 (1992), 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘10’Martínez, E., Cariñena, J. F. and Sarlet, V.. Derivations of differential forms along the tangent bundle projection. Part II. Differential Geom. Appl., to appear.Google Scholar
‘11’Morandi, C., Ferrario, C., Vecchio, G. Lo, Marmo, C. and Rubano, C.. The inverse problem in the calculus of variations and the geometry of the tangent bundle. Phys. Rep. 188 (3, 4) (1990), 147–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘12’Sarlet, W. and Martínez, E.. Derivations of semi-basic forms and symmetries of second-order equations. In Gronp Theoretical Methods in Physics, Lecture Notes in Phys. vol. 382 (Springer-Verlag, 1991), pp. 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘13’Sarlet, W.. New aspects of integrability of generalized Hénon–Heiles systems. J. Phys. A, to appear.Google Scholar
‘14’Warner, F. W.. Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds (Scott, Foresman and Co., 1971).Google Scholar
- 31
- Cited by