Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:38:46.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Folding-like techniques for CAT(0) cube complexes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2021

MICHAEL BEN–ZVI
Affiliation:
Colby College, Department of Mathematics Davis Building, Second Floor 5830 Mayflower Hill Waterville, Maine 04901 U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]
ROBERT KROPHOLLER
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, Zeeman Building, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL. e-mail: [email protected]
RYLEE ALANZA LYMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rutgers University–Newark Smith Hall, Room 216, 101 Warren Street Newark, NJ 072102, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In a seminal paper, Stallings introduced folding of morphisms of graphs. One consequence of folding is the representation of finitely-generated subgroups of a finite-rank free group as immersions of finite graphs. Stallings’s methods allow one to construct this representation algorithmically, giving effective, algorithmic answers and proofs to classical questions about subgroups of free groups. Recently Dani–Levcovitz used Stallings-like methods to study subgroups of right-angled Coxeter groups, which act geometrically on CAT(0) cube complexes. In this paper we extend their techniques to fundamental groups of non-positively curved cube complexes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy EXC 2044 –390685587, Mathematics Münster: Dynamics Geometry Structure.

References

B., Beeker and N., Lazarovich. Stallings’ folds for cube complexes. Israel J. Math. 227(1):331363, (2018).Google Scholar
Bridson, R. and AndrÉ, Haefliger. Metric spaces of non-positive curvature, volume 319 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S. Brown. Geometric structures on negatively curved groups and their subgroups. PhD. thesis University College London (2016).Google Scholar
P.-E., Caprace and M., Sageev. Rank rigidity for CAT(0) cube complexes. Geom. Funct. Anal. 21(4): (2011) 851891.Google Scholar
Pallavi, Dani and I., Levcovitz. Subgroups of right-angled coxeter groups via stallings-like techniques. Available at arXiv:1908.09046 [Math.GT] (2019).Google Scholar
Gromov, M.. Hyperbolic groups. In Essays in group theory, volume 8 of Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. (Springer, New York, 1987), pages 75–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
F., Haglund. Finite index subgroups of graph products. Geom. Dedicata 135: (2008), 167209.Google Scholar
O., Kharlampovich, A., Miasnikov, and P., Weil. Stallings graphs for quasi-convex subgroups. J. Algebra 488: (2017), 442483.Google Scholar
M., Roller. Poc sets, median algebras and group actions. habilitation thesis. Available at arXiv:1607.07747 [math.GN] (July 2016).Google Scholar
M., Sageev. Ends of group pairs and non-positively curved cube complexes. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 71(3): (1995), 585–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M., Sageev. $\textrm{CAT(0)}$ cube complexes and groups. In Geometric group theory, volume 21 of IAS/Park City Math. Ser., pages 7–54 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, J. R.. Topology of finite graphs. Invent. Math. 71(3): (1983), 551565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar