Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:40:12.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deuteron bombardment of the heavy elements

II. Platinum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. S. Krishnan  and
E. A. Nahum
R. S. Krishnan
Affiliation:
Cavendish LaboratoryCambridge
E. A. Nahum
Affiliation:
Cavendish LaboratoryCambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Experiments on the bombardment of platinum with 9 M.e.V. deuterons are reported. Radioactive isotopes of platinum of periods 32 min., 18 hr. and 2·8 days, and isotopes of gold of periods 2·6 and 5·6 days are reported. The 2·6 day gold isotope is formed directly by deuteron bombardment as well as by decay of the 32 min. platinum isotope. The absorption of the β-rays in aluminium and of the γ-rays in lead has been measured, and assignments have been made for most of the isotopes reported. Excitation function measurements have been made for the 32 min. and 18 hr. platinum isotopes, and the form of the energy-yield curve is the same for both these elements. The form of the curve seems to favour the Oppenheimer-Phillips process for the formation of these radioelements by the reaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , October 1941 , pp. 422 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Krishnan, and Nahum, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 36 (1940), 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Cork, and Lawrence, . Phys. Rev. 49 (1936), 788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Feather, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 34 (1938), 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)McLennan, , Grimmet, and Read, . Nature, Lond., 135 (1935), 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, , Kamen, and Ruben, . Phys. Rev. 52 (1937), 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaldi, and others. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 149 (1935), 522.Google Scholar
(5)Sargent, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 139 (1933), 659.Google Scholar
(6)Marshall, and Ward, . Canadian J. Res. A, 15 (1937), 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Cork, and Halpern, . Phys. Rev. 58 (1940), 201.Google Scholar
(8)Lawson, and Cork, . Phys. Rev. 58 (1940), 580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Mano, . J. Phys. Radium, 5 (1934), 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Volkoff, . Phys. Rev. 57 (1940), 866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Hurst, , Latham, and Lewis, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 174 (1940), 126.Google Scholar
Cork, , Halpern, and Tatel, . Phys. Rev. 57 (1940), 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 37 (1941), 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, and Krishnan, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. (in the Press).Google Scholar