Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:45:54.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cubical geometry in the polygonalisation complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

MARK C. BELL ,
VALENTINA DISARLO  and
ROBERT TANG
MARK C. BELL
Affiliation:
Warwick Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K. e-mail: [email protected]
VALENTINA DISARLO
Affiliation:
Mathematisches Institut, Heidelberg Universitaet, Heidelberg 691220, Germany. e-mail: [email protected]
ROBERT TANG
Affiliation:
Topology and Geometry of Manifolds Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, 1919-1Tancha, Onna-son, Kunigami-gun, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We introduce the polygonalisation complex of a surface, a cube complex whose vertices correspond to polygonalisations. This is a geometric model for the mapping class group and it is motivated by works of Harer, Mosher and Penner. Using properties of the flip graph, we show that the midcubes in the polygonalisation complex can be extended to a family of embedded and separating hyperplanes, parametrised by the arcs in the surface.

We study the crossing graph of these hyperplanes and prove that it is quasi-isometric to the arc complex. We use the crossing graph to prove that, generically, different surfaces have different polygonalisation complexes. The polygonalisation complex is not CAT(0), but we can characterise the vertices where Gromov's link condition fails. This gives a tool for proving that, generically, the automorphism group of the polygonalisation complex is the (extended) mapping class group of the surface.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 167 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Aramayona, J. Combinatorial superrigidity for graphs associated to surfaces. Topology, Geometry and Algebra of low-dimensional manifolds, RIMS Kôkyûroku, no. 1991 (2016), pp. 43–53.Google Scholar
[2] Aramayona, J., Koberda, T. and Parlier, H. Injective maps between flip graphs. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 65 (2015), no. 5, 2037–2055.Google Scholar
[3] Bell, M. fatter (computer software), pypi.python.org/pypi/fatter (2016), Version 0.1.3.Google Scholar
[4] Bridson, M. R. and Haefliger, A. Metric spaces of non-positive curvature. Grundlehren Math. Wiss. [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 319 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999).Google Scholar
[5] Disarlo, V. Combinatorial rigidity of arc complexes. ArXiv e-prints (2015).Google Scholar
[6] Disarlo, V. and Parlier, H. The geometry of flip graphs and mapping class groups. ArXiv e-prints (2014), to appear in Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.Google Scholar
[7] Fock, V. V. and Goncharov, A. B. Dual Teichmüller and lamination spaces. Handbook fo Tecihmueller Theory, vol. 1 11 (2007), 647–684.Google Scholar
[8] Funar, L. Ptolemy groupoids actions on Teichmüller spaces, Modern trends in geometry and topology, Cluj Univ. Press, Cluj-Napoca, 2006, pp. 185–201.Google Scholar
[9] Gromov, M. Hyperbolic groups. Essays in group theory. Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. vol. 8., (Springer, New York, 1987), pp. 75–263.Google Scholar
[10] Harer, J. L. The virtual cohomological dimension of the mapping class group of an orientable surface. Invent. Math. 84 (1986), no. 1, 157–176.Google Scholar
[11] Hensel, S., Przytycki, P. and Webb, R. C. H. 1-slim triangles and uniform hyperbolicity for arc graphs and curve graphs. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 17 (2015), no. 4, 755–762.Google Scholar
[12] Irmak, E. and McCarthy, J. D. Injective simplicial maps of the arc complex. Turkish J. Math. 34 (2010), no. 3, 339–354.Google Scholar
[13] Kapovich, M. and Leeb, B. Actions of discrete groups on nonpositively curved spaces. Math. Ann. 306 (1996), no. 2, 341–352.Google Scholar
[14] Korkmaz, M. and Papadopoulos, A. On the ideal triangulation graph of a punctured surface. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 62 (2012), no. 4, 1367–1382.Google Scholar
[15] Masur, H. and Schleimer, S. The geometry of the disk complex. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 26 (2013), no. 1, 1–62.Google Scholar
[16] Mosher, L. Mapping class groups are automatic. Ann. of Math. (2) 142 (1995), no. 2, 303–384.Google Scholar
[17] Penner, R. C. Decorated Teichmüller theory. QGM Master Class Series, European Math. Soc. (EMS) (Zürich, 2012) With a foreword by Manin, Yuri I.Google Scholar
[18] Yu, N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev. Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups. Comm. Math. Phys. 127 (1990), no. 1, 1–26.Google Scholar
[19] Roger, J. Ptolemy groupoids, shear coordinates and the augmented Teichmuller space, ArXiv e-prints (2012).Google Scholar
[20] Sageev, M. CAT(0) cube complexes and groups. Geometric group theory, IAS/Park City Math. Ser., vol. 21 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2014), pp. 7–54.Google Scholar
[21] Wise, D. T. From riches to raags: 3-manifolds, right-angled Artin groups and cubical geometry. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 117. Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2012).Google Scholar