Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:04:35.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A critical examination of the Benedicks homogeneous thermoelectric effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Henry L. C. Ch'eng
Affiliation:
Yenching UniversityPeiping, China
William Band
Affiliation:
Yenching UniversityPeiping, China

Extract

Although the existence of an electromotive force in apparently homogeneous circuits under asymmetrical temperature distributions has been questioned by only a minority of workers in this field, all attempts at explaining the effect have been little more than speculations. These speculations may be divided roughly into two types, first(2), those which agree with the contention of Benedicks that the E.M.F. is an essentially new effect not explicable in terms of the classical theory of Kelvin, and secondly(3), those which contend that the effect is essentially spurious, to be explained away as due either to hidden sources of error, or to unsuspected heterogeneities in the circuit. The somewhat fantastic claim of Benedicks' school that the effect was an inverse of the Thomson effect, which proved entirely false upon examination in the light of Sommerfeld's work(4), did much to increase scepticism. Benedicks' later claim to have found yet another inverse of his original effect(5), the “electro-thermal” effect, has also been refuted(6), and this does not inspire confidence in the genuine nature of the original effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Haga, and Zernicke, . Proc. K. Akad. Amst. 21 (1919), 1882.Google Scholar
(2)Benedicks, . Numerous papers in C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris (19161920).Google Scholar
Seth, , Anand, and Anand, . Ind. J. Phys. 3 (1928), 431.Google Scholar
(3)Trouton, . Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. (1886).Google Scholar
Bernade, . Phys. Rev. 18 (1921), 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuitsui, . Proc. Imp. Acad. Japan (1928 and 1929).Google Scholar
(4)Sommerfeld, and Frank, . Rev. Mod. Phys. 3 (1931).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Benedicks, . Actualités scientifiques et industrielles, 130 (1933).Google Scholar
(6)Band, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 33 (1937), 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Bruzs, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 151 (1935), 640.Google Scholar
(8)Band, and Feng, . Proc. Phys. Soc. 46 (1934), 515.Google Scholar
Band, and Ch'en, . Proc. Phys. Soc. 47 (1935), 862, 904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Band, . Proc. Phys. Soc. 47 (1935), 862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Fraser, . Phil. Mag. 25 (1938), 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Richardson, . Emission of electricity from hot bodies, 2nd ed.London, 1921.Google Scholar
Dushman, . Rev. Mod. Phys. 2 (1930), 473–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Bridgman, . Thermodynamics of electrical phenomena in metals. New York, 1934.Google Scholar
(13)Ch'en, and Band, . Proc. Phys. Soc. 47 (1935), 904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Ch'en, and Band, . Proc. Phys. Soc. 48 (1936), 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedicks, . C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 165 (1917), 426.Google Scholar
Benedicks, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 169 (1919), 578.Google Scholar
Gouneau, . C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 170 (1920), 1567.Google Scholar
Bernade, . Phys. Rev. 183 (1921), 119.Google Scholar
(15)Band, and Hsü, . Proc. Phys. Soc. 48 (1936), 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar