Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:40:18.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Certain integral representations for Whittaker functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Hari Shanker
Affiliation:
Anglo-Arabic CollegeDelhi University, India

Extract

1. Shastri (1) has shown that if and then

But (Goldstein (2))

hence substituting from (1·2) in (1·1) and changing the order of integration, which we suppose to be permissible, we find that if

then

assuming of course that the integrals converge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Shastri, N. A.Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 20 (1944), 211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Goldstein, S.Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 34 (1932), 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Meijer, C. S.Nieuw Arch. Wiskunde, (2), 18 (1934), 3557.Google Scholar
(4)Erdelyi, A.Proc. Benares Math. Soc. N.S., 1 (1939), 3953.Google Scholar
(5)Meijer, C. S.Proc. K. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam, 37 (1934), 805–12.Google Scholar
(6)Watson, G. N.The Theory of Bessel-Functions (1922), § 13.21 (8).Google Scholar
(7)Hari, Shanker. J. Indian Math. Soc. 7 (1943), 63–7.Google Scholar