Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:16:59.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Which computer language?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

R.H. Macmillan
R.H. Macmillan*
Affiliation:
43 Church Rd Woburn Sands, Bucks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Any discussion of languages suitable to be taught in school mathematics classes must first attempt to answer the question as to whether computer programming ought to form any part of the mathematics curriculum. The answer is by no means obvious, especially when the view has been expressed by the editor of this journal that “all programming languages (though particularly BASIC) are inimical to mathematical thinking at a higher level ”.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 77 , Issue 479 , July 1993 , pp. 242 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. MacKinnon, N. “Friends in youth”, Math. Gaz., 77, 478 March 1993 pp 2–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Tall, D., and Watson, F.R., “Computing languages for the mathematics classroom”, Math. Gaz. 71, 458, December 1987, pp 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Baron, N., Computer languages, Penguin 1988.Google Scholar
4. McGregor, J.J., and Watt, A.H., “Pascal rules O.K.?” Math. Gaz. 65, 433, October 1981, pp 171–182.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, K., “Choice of programming language for schools – (2)”, Math. Gaz., 72, 462, December 1988, pp 291–293.Google Scholar
6. Watson, F.R., et al, Logo and mathematics, Keele Mathematical Educational Pubs., 1990.Google Scholar