The Theorem that, if y3 + 3xy + 2x3 = 0, then has been the topic of four recent notes in the Gazette, namely 1542 (not 1546) by E. H. N., 1610 by Mr. F. Bowman, 1684 by Mr. F. M. Goldner, and 1801 by Mr. H. V, Lowry. It seems worth while to supplement these notes by some comments which were for the most part suggested by the concluding lines of the note by E. H. N.

The writers of the four notes have looked at the theorem from the point of view of a candidate in an examination ; if it were set in a Higher Certificate Distinction Paper, I have little doubt that a fair proportion of the candidates would recognise that the cubic is a unicursal cubic, they would write x/y = u (or make some equivalent substitution), they would express x and y as rational functions of u, and they would realise that the question must inevitably come out by calculating accurately the differential coefficients of y with respect to x and then substituting in the left-hand side of the differential equation. In fact, they would reproduce the substance of the work of E. H. N. with the omission of his refinement of taking the reciprocal of y as an auxiliary variable to abbreviate the analysis.