Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:33:55.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Theory of Determinants, Matrices and Invariants. By H. W. Turnbull. Pp. xvi + 338. 25s. net. 1928. (Blackie.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 466 note * Owing to Mr. Wakeford’s sacrifice of himself in the War, hia extraordinary powers in Geometry and Algebra were not so widely known as they deserve to be. I may therefore take an opportunity of referring briefly to the striking impression which he made on those who taught him; my own direct knowledge was in Applied Mathematics, which he seemed to regard as necessary but dull; still, if he took any interest in a particular problem, he could always provide a good solution. But those who dealt with his own subjects regarded hia early loss as irreparable; and, in conversation with him, when he was in Cambridge shortly before his end, it was easy to see that he had a rare keenness in his work, much of which he succeeded in completing in the trenches.

page 466 note † This matrix corresponds to the set of coefficients in a quadric surface of revolution; if the matrix is not restricted to be symmetrical, even simpler examples are easy to construct.

page 467 note * Take X=x+y, and replace x by X; then the substitution becomes

Now if we take Y as any linear function lX+my, we see that Y’ = — mX+2Y; and here the term in X cannot be removed; but it can be standardised by putting m= — 1, and then the reduced form is

page 467 note † The assumption that the usual standard form still persists when Δ(λ) =0 has equal roots, means, in the theory of two conies, that only double contact can be handled.