Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:36:23.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constructing a ring without unique factorisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

Colin R. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University College of Wales, Penglais, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ
M. Lidster
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University College of Wales, Penglais, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ

Extract

The study of unique factorisation is almost as old as mathematics itself. The so-called Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, which states that every integer greater than 1 can be factorised into a product of primes in only one way, was probably the first major theorem proved. It is interesting to note that Euclid (c. 300 B.C.) did not give the result in this form. He proved (IX 14) that “if a number be the least that is measured by prime numbers, it will not be measured by any other prime number except those originally measuring it” (see [1]).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Heath, T. L., The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements, Vol II. Cambridge University Press (1908).Google Scholar
2. Fletcher, C. R., Unique factorisation rings, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 65, 579583 (1969).Google Scholar
3. Fletcher, C. R., Equivalent conditions for unique factorisation, Publ. Dept. Math. Lyon 8,1322 (1971).Google Scholar