Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:29:54.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boole’s mathematical blindness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

Michael A. B. Deakin
Michael A. B. Deakin*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

George Boole, who very clearly rates as a mathematician of the very first rank, set out to solve a mathematical problem and his efforts to do so continued throughout the whole of his professional life. He never succeeded, despite the fact that he held the key to the solution for a good deal of this time. How and why he came to fail in his attempt is the subject of this paper. The difficulties encountered by students may be better understood if we realise that even the very greatest of mathematicians experience the same limitations and that they arise from the same causes.

Type
Articles
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 80 , Issue 489 , November 1996 , pp. 511 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Boole, G. An investigation of the laws of thought on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities, Macmillan, (1854); Dover, New York (n.d. 1956?).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Boole, G. On the integration of linear differential equations with constant coefficients, Cambridge Math. J. 1st ser. 2 (1840–1841) pp. 114–119.Google Scholar
3. Deakin, M. A. B. Successive discoveries of the Heaviside expansion theorem. Int. J. Math. Ed. Sei. Tech. 17 (1986) pp. 51–60.Google Scholar
4. Boole, G. A treatise on differential equations, Macmillan, (1859); 2nd Edn. ibid. (1865); 2nd Edn. reprinted as 5th Edn. Chelsea, New York (n.d. 1959?).Google Scholar
5. Doetsch, G. Theorie und Anwendung der Laplace-Transformation, Springer, Berlin (1937); 2nd Edn., Dover, New York (1943).Google Scholar
6. Deakin, M. A. B. The development of the Laplace transform, 1737–1937: I. Euler to Spitzer, 1737–1880. Arch. Hist. Ex. Sei. 25 (1981) pp. 343–390.Google Scholar
7. Gregory, D. F. On the residual calculus, Cambridge. Math. J. 1st Ser. 1 (1839) pp. 145–155.Google Scholar
8. Hille, E. Ordinary differential equations in the complex plane, Wiley, New York (1976).Google Scholar
9. Dalton, J. P. Symbolic operators, Witwatersrand, Johannesberg (1954).Google Scholar
10. Mikusiński, J. Operational calculus, Pergamon (1959).Google Scholar
11. Koppelmann, E. The calculus of operations and the rise of abstract algebra. Arch. Hist. Ex. Sci. 8 (1972) pp. 155–242.Google Scholar