Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:06:46.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

91.46 Integrals – indefinite or misdefined?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

Douglas Quadling
Douglas Quadling*
Affiliation:
12 Archway Court, Barton Road, Cambridge CB3 9LW
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 91 , Issue 521 , July 2007 , pp. 303 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The School Mathematics Project, Mathematics for A and AS level: Pure mathematics, Cambridge University Press (1997) p. 171.Google Scholar
2. Neill, Hugh and Quadling, Douglas, Cambridge advanced mathematics: Core 1 & 2, Cambridge University Press (2004) p. 301 Google Scholar
3. Maxwell, E.A., Fallacies in mathematics, Cambridge University Press (1959).Google Scholar
4. Neill, Hugh and Quadling, Douglas, Cambridge advanced mathematics: Further pure 2&3, Cambridge University Press (2005) p. 171.Google Scholar
5. Howson, A. G., A handbook of terms used in algebra and analysis, Cambridge University Press (1972) p. 134.Google Scholar