Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:11:52.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

97.09 The devil's series – Did it fool Euler?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Thomas J. Osler
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA, e-mail:[email protected]
Steven Donahue
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA, e-mail:[email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes 97.01 to 97.16
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Euler, L., Exercitatio analytica, ubi imprimis seriei maxime generalis summatio traditur. (An analytic exercise, for which a most general summation of series is given.), E 685. Originally published in Nova Acta Academiae Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitinae 9, 1795, pp. 4153. Opera Omnia: Series I, Volume 16, pp. 266-281. On the web at http://eulerarchive.maa.org/ Google Scholar
2. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I., Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Dover Publications, 1964.Google Scholar
3. Osler, T. J., Euler and the functional equation for the zeta function. The Mathematical Scientist. 34 (2009), pp. 6273.Google Scholar