Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:15:58.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in fin ray counts of 0-group turbot (Psetta maxima) and brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) on the west coast of Ireland: 2006–2009

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2011

Paula S. Haynes ,
David McGrath  and
Deirdre Brophy
Paula S. Haynes*
Affiliation:
Commercial Fisheries Research Group, Department of Life Sciences, Galway–Mayo Institute of Technology, Dublin Road, Galway, Ireland
David McGrath
Affiliation:
Commercial Fisheries Research Group, Department of Life Sciences, Galway–Mayo Institute of Technology, Dublin Road, Galway, Ireland
Deirdre Brophy
Affiliation:
Commercial Fisheries Research Group, Department of Life Sciences, Galway–Mayo Institute of Technology, Dublin Road, Galway, Ireland
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: P.S. Haynes, Commercial Fisheries Research Group, Department of Life Sciences, Galway–Mayo Institute of Technology, Dublin Road, Galway, Ireland email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Recently settled turbot Psetta maxima and brill Scophthalmus rhombus are difficult to distinguish, as they are almost identical in appearance and lack the diagnostic adult characteristics. Fin ray counts, which can be used as an aid in the identification of flatfish juveniles, are reported to show some overlap between turbot and brill. 0-group flatfish were collected from sandy beaches along the west coast of Ireland by beach seining in 2009. When counted and plotted, the dorsal and anal fin ray counts clearly separated the specimens into two groups. The two groups were assumed to be brill and turbot on the basis of literature data, suggesting higher dorsal and anal fin ray counts occur in brill. This confirmed that fin ray counts can probably be used as a diagnostic tool in these 0-group flatfish from west of Ireland waters. Additionally, temporal and spatial variability in fin ray counts was also revealed in the present study, emphasizing that regional difference need to be taken into account when using this diagnostic method.

Keywords

0-group turbot0-group brillfin ray countsidentificationvariability
Type
Research Article
Information
Marine Biodiversity Records , Volume 3 , June 2010 , e124
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, B.M., Brophy, D., McGrath, D. and King, P.A. (2008) Hatching times, larval duration, settlement, and larval growth of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa (L.)) in Galway Bay determined using otolith microstructure. Biology and Environment 108, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon, (2005) Government body responsible for compiling Irish official statistics. http://www.cso.ie. Accessed 28 February 2008.Google Scholar
Burke, J.S., Monaghan, J.P. and Yokoyama, S. (2000) Efforts to understand stock structure of summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) in North Carolina, USA. Journal of Sea Research 44, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldon, G. and Smith, G. (1986) Quick laboratory identification of juvenile flounders (Rhombosolea plebia and R. leporine). New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 20, 77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, P.S., Allen, B.M., Brophy, D. and McGrath, D. (2008) Fin-ray count variation in 0-group flatfish: plaice (Pleuronectes platessa (L.)) and flounder (Platichthys flesus (L.)) on the west coast of Ireland. Biology and Environment 108, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, P.S., Brophy, D., McGrath, D., O'Callaghan, R., Comerford, S. and Casburn, P. (2010) Annual and spatial variation in the abundance, length and condition of turbot (Psetta maxima L.) on nursery grounds on the west coast of Ireland: 2000–2007. Journal of Sea Research 64, 494–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolliffe, I.T. (2002) Principal component analysis. 2nd edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, I., Seikai, T., Tanaka, M. and Kuwamura, K. (2000) Geographic variations in dorsal and anal ray counts of juvenile Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus, in the Japan Sea. Environmental Biology of Fishes 57, 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, C.C. (1988) Factors controlling meristic variation. Journal of Fish Physiology 11B, 197–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, R. and MacCrimmon, H. (1977) Evidence of genetic and environmental influences on meristic variation in the rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. Environmental Biology of Fishes 2, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J.H. (1971) Pleuronectidae, fiches d'identification des oeufs et larves de poissons, 4–6. International Council for the Exploration of the Seas, Copenhagen, pp. 18.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E., Bagge, O. and MacKenzie, B. (1998) Wind-induced transport of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) early life-history stages in the Skagerrak-Kattegat. Journal of Sea Research 39, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, B., McGrath, D. and Brophy, D. (2010) Scales of variability in fin ray counts of flounder on Irish and Welsh coasts. Biology and Environment, in press.Google Scholar
Raedemaecker, F. de, Keating, J., Brophy, D., O'Connor, I. and McGrath, D. (2010) Spatial variability in the diet, condition and growth of juvenile plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) at sandy beach nursery grounds on the south-west coast of Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, in press.Google Scholar
Russell, F.S. (1976) The eggs and planktonic stages of British marine fishes. Part II. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Safford, S.E. and Booke, H. (1992) Lack of biochemical genetic and morphometric evidence for discrete stocks of northwest Atlantic herring Clupea harengus harengus. Fishery Bulletin (US) 90, 203–210.Google Scholar
Shephard, S., Haynes, P.S., Brophy, D., McGrath, D. and Boele, S.J. (2010) Relative abundance of juvenile turbot Psetta maxima and brill Scophthalmus rhombus suggests negative interactions on nursery grounds. Journal of Fish Biology, in press.Google Scholar
Swain, D.P. and Foote, C.J. (1999) Stocks and chameleons: the use of phenotypic variation in stock identification. Fisheries Research 43, 1123–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. (1969) The fishes of the British Isles and North-West Europe. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar