Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:09:08.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Symbioses of decapod crustaceans along the coast of Espírito Santo, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2009

Peter Wirtz*
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciencias do Mar do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, P 8000-117 Faro, Portugal
Gustavo de Melo
Affiliation:
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazareth 481, Ipiranga, 04263-000 São Paulo, Brazil
Sammy de Grave
Affiliation:
Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom
*
Corresponding should be addressed to: P. Wirtz, Centro de Ciencias do Mar do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, P 8000-117 Faro, Portugal email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Potential host species were searched for decapod crustaceans along the coasts of Espírito Santo State, Brazil. On five species of sea anemones checked, nine species of decapods were encountered. On three species of black coral checked, two decapod species were encountered. On six species of gorgonians checked, three species of decapods were encountered. In nine species of bivalves and one species of gastropod checked, one decapod species was encountered. On three sea urchin species checked, three decapod species were encountered. A further seven potential host species investigated did not have macroscopically visible symbiotic decapods. Four of these 18 symbiotic decapod species represent new records for the State of Espírito Santo, five species represent new records for Brazil, and at least one species (probably three) were new for science. The sea anemone Condylactis gigantea harboured the largest number of symbionts (eight species) and the shrimp Neopontonides sp. occurred on the largest number of hosts (four different species of gorgonians).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almeida, A.O. and Coelho, P.A. (2008) Estuarine and marine brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda) from Bahia, Brazil: checklist and zoogeographical considerations. Latin-American Journal of Aquatic Research 36, 183222.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A. (2008) Social monogamy in the shrimp Pontonia margarita, a symbiont of Pinctada mazatlanica off the Pacific coast of Panama. Marine Biology 153, 387395.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Thiel, M. (2007) The mating system of symbiotic crustaceans. A conceptual model based on optimality and ecological constraints. In DuVy, J.E. and Thiel, M. (eds) Reproductive and social behavior: crustaceans as model systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 250267.Google Scholar
Calado, R., Dionisio, G. and Dinis, M.T. (2007) Decapod crustaceans associated with the snakelock anemone Anemonia sulcata. Living there or just passing by? Scientia Marina 71, 287292.Google Scholar
Coelho, P.A., Ramos-Porto, M. and Melo, G.A.S. (1990) Crustáceos decápodos do estado de Alagoas. Anais da Sociedade Nordestina de Zoologia 3, 2134.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.A. (1992) Acclimatisation of the shrimp, Periclimenes anthophilus, to the giant sea anemone, Condylactis gigantea. Bulletin of Marine Science 50, 331341.Google Scholar
Criales, M.M. (1984) Shrimps associated with coelenterates, echinoderms, and molluscs in the Santa Marta region, Colombia. Journal of Crustacean Biology 4/2, 307317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grave, S. (2007) A new species of Pseudocoutierea Holthuis from the Caribbean coast of Panama (Crustacea, Decapoda, Palaemonidae), with a key to the genus. Zootaxa 1397, 2937.Google Scholar
De Grave, S. (2008) A new species of Periclimenes (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae) from Guarapari, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Zootaxa 1925, 1422.Google Scholar
Dellinger, T., Davenport, J. and Wirtz, P. (1997) Comparisons of social structure of columbus crabs living on loggerhead sea turtles and inanimate flotsam. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 77, 185194.Google Scholar
De Melo, G.A.S. and Boehs, G. (2004) Rediscovery of Holothuriophilus tomentosus (Ortmann) comb. nov. (Crustacea, Brachyura, Pinnotheridae) in the Brazilian coast. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 21, 229232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesel, R. (1986) Optimal mate searching strategy in the symbiotic spider crab Inachus phalangium (Decapoda). Ethology 72, 311328.Google Scholar
Epifanio, R. de A., Martins, D.L., Villaca, R. and Gabriel, R. (1999) Chemical defences against fish predation in three Brazilian octocorals: 11,12-epoxypukalide as a feeding deterrent in Phyllogorgia dilatata. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 22552265.Google Scholar
Fautin, D.G., Guo, C.-C. and Hwang, J.-S. (1995) Costs and benefits of the symbiosis between the anemone shrimp Periclimenes brevicarpalis and its host Entacmaea quadricolor. Marine Ecology Progress Series 129, 7784.Google Scholar
Gasparini, J.L., Floeter, S.R., Ferreira, C.E.L. and Sazima, I. (2005) Marine ornamental trade in Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 28832899.Google Scholar
Giese, C., Mebs, D. and Werding, B. (1996) Resistance and vulnerability of crustaceans to cytolytic sea anemone toxins. Toxicon 34, 955958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goh, N.K.C., Ng, P.K.L. and Chou, L.M. (1999) Notes on the shallow water gorgonian associated fauna on coral reefs in Singapore. Bulletin of Marine Science 65, 259282.Google Scholar
Herrnkind, W., Stanton, G. and Conklin, E. (1976) Initial characterization of the commensal complex associated with the anemone Lebrunia danae at Grand Bahama. Bulletin of Marine Science 26, 6571.Google Scholar
Holbrook, S.J., Brooks, A.J., Schmitt, R.J. and Stewart, H.L. (2008) Effects of sheltering fish on growth of their host corals. Marine Biology 155, 521530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human, P. and Deloach, N. (2002) Reef creature identification, 2nd edition. Jacksonvilla, FL: New World Publications Inc, 420 pp.Google Scholar
Knowlton, N. (1980) Sexual selection and dimorphism in two demes of a symbiotic, pair-bonding snapping shrimp. Evolution 34, 161173.Google Scholar
Levine, D.M. and Blanchard, O.J. (1980) Acclimatisation of two shrimps of the genus Periclimenes to sea anemones. Bulletin of Marine Science 30, 460466.Google Scholar
Patton, W.K. (1967) Commensal Crustacea. Proceedings of the Symposium on Crustacea, Marine Biological Association of India. India Part III, 89, 12281243.Google Scholar
Patton, W.K., Patton, R.J. and Barnes, A. (1985) On the biology of Gnathophylloides mineri, a shrimp inhabiting the sea urchin Tripneustes ventricosus. Journal of Crustacean Biology 5, 616625.Google Scholar
Ramos-Porto, M. and Coelho, P.A. (1998) Malacostraca. Eucarida. Caridea (Alpheoidea excluded). In Young, P.S. (ed.) Catalogue of Crustacea of Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, pp. 325350, (Série Livros no. 6).Google Scholar
Ross, D.M. (1983) Symbiotic relationships. In Bliss, D. (ed.) The biology of Crustacea. New York: Academic Press, pp. 163212.Google Scholar
Schoppe, S. and Werding, B. (1996) The boreholes of the sea urchin genus Echinometra (Echinodermata: Echinoidea: Echinometridae) as a microhabitat in tropical South America. Marine Ecology 17, 181186.Google Scholar
Smith, W.L. (1977) Beneficial behavior of a symbiotic shrimp to its host anemone. Bulletin of Marine Science 27, 343346.Google Scholar
Spotte, S. (1996) Supply of regenerated nitrogen to sea anemones by their symbiotic shrimps. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 198, 2736.Google Scholar
Spotte, S. and Bubucis, P.M. (1996) Diversity and abundance of caridean shrimps associated with the slimy sea plume Pseudopterogorgia americana. Marine Ecology Progress Series 133, 299302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telford, M. (1982) Echinoderm spine structure, feeding and host relationships of four species of Dissodactylus (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae). Bulletin of Marine Science 32, 584594.Google Scholar
Thiel, M. and Baeza, J.A. (2001) Factors affecting the social behaviour of symbiotic Crustacea: a modelling approach. Symbiosis 30, 163190.Google Scholar
Thiel, M., Zander, A. and Baeza, J.A. (2003a) Movements of the symbiotic crab Liopetrolisthes mitra between its host sea urchin Tetragypus niger. Bulletin of Marine Science 72, 89101.Google Scholar
Thiel, M., Zander, A., Valdivia, N., Baeza, J.A. and Rueffler, C. (2003b) Host fidelity of a symbiotic porcellanid crab: the importance of host characteristics. Journal of Zoology 261, 353362.Google Scholar
Wirtz, P. (1997) Crustacean symbionts of the club-tipped sea anemone Telmatactis cricoides at Madeira and the Canary Islands. Journal of Zoology 242, 799811.Google Scholar
Wirtz, P. and Diesel, R. (1983) The social structure of Inachus phalangium, a spider crab associated with the sea anemone Anemonia sulcata. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 62, 209234.Google Scholar
Wirtz, P., Müller, B. and Nahke, P. (1988) The Caribbean shrimp Tuleariocaris neglecta Chace, 1969 found in association with Diadema antillarum at Madeira, and two new records of decapod crustaceans from the Cape Verde Islands. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 105, 169171.Google Scholar
Wirtz, P. and d'Udekem d'Acoz, C. (2001) Decapod crustaceans associated with Antipatharia, Gorgonaria and Mollusca at the Cape Verde Islands. Helgoland Marine Research 55, 112115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirtz, P. and d'Udekem d'Acoz, C. (in press) Crustaceans associated with Cnidaria, Bivalvia, Echinoidea and Pisces at São Tomé and Príncipe Islands (eastern central Atlantic). Arquipelago—Life and Marine Sciences.Google Scholar
Young, P.S. and Serejo, C. (2006) List of crustacean species recorded from the Abrolhos region (including the nearby coast) indicating habitat, range within Brazil, and general distribution. In Dutra, G.F., Allen, G.R., Werner, T. and McKenna, S.A. (eds) 2005. A rapid marine biodiversity assessment of the Abrolhos Bank, Bahia, Brazil. Washington, DC: Conservation International. [RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment, no. 38].Google Scholar