Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:06:50.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Production of juvenile barber goby Elacatinus figaro in captivity: developing technology to reduce fishing pressure on an endangered species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2010

Marcelo Roberto Pereira Shei*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Instituto de Oceanografia, Laboratório de Piscicultura Marinha, Rio Grande-RS, CP 474, Brasil, CEP 96201-900, Brazil
Kleber Campos Miranda-Filho
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Instituto de Oceanografia, Laboratório de Piscicultura Marinha, Rio Grande-RS, CP 474, Brasil, CEP 96201-900, Brazil
Ricardo Vieira Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Instituto de Oceanografia, Laboratório de Piscicultura Marinha, Rio Grande-RS, CP 474, Brasil, CEP 96201-900, Brazil
Luís André Sampaio
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Instituto de Oceanografia, Laboratório de Piscicultura Marinha, Rio Grande-RS, CP 474, Brasil, CEP 96201-900, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M.R.P. Shei, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Instituto de Oceanografia, Laboratório de Piscicultura Marinha, Rio Grande-RS, CP 474, Brasil, CEP 96201-900, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The barber goby Elacatinus figaro, native to the Brazilian Atlantic coast, is endangered due to over-exploitation by the ornamental industry. It is expected that once the technology for juvenile production is mastered, one could reduce fishing pressure by commercializing fish raised in captivity and stocking enhancement programmes can be established. This work was carried out in order to describe natural breeding, embryonic development and larviculture of barber goby in the laboratory. The first spawning was observed 24 days after the pairs were formed, thereafter barber goby spawned every 8 to 10 days at 26°C. Fecundity ranged from 430 to 1020 eggs per clutch with average hatching rate of 69 ± 16%. Fertilized eggs are elliptical in shape and present adhesive filaments at the proximal end and five protuberances at the distal end. Egg length averaged 1.81 ± 0.1 mm and mean width was 0.61 ± 0.03 mm. The embryonic developmental period lasted 7 days and newly hatched larvae measured 3.15 ± 0.07 mm, showing positive phototaxis. Larvae were fed with rotifers Brachionus plicatilis in green water culture along with the microalgae Nannochloropsis oculata from 1 to 20 days after hatching (DAH). Artemia nauplii were added to the diet 15 DAH, and 5 days later rotifers were no longer offered. The results of the present study demonstrate the viability to produce naturally spawned eggs of the barber goby E. figaro in captivity. Larvae settle to the bottom 28 to 35 DAH, when total length was equal to 8.5 mm in average.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, J.G., Famdale, B.M., Bruce, M.P., Navas, J.M. and Carrillo, M. (1997) Effects of broodstock dietary lipid on fatty acid composition of eggs from sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquaculture 149, 107119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, R., Faria, C., Gil, F., Gonçalves, E.J. and Almada, V.C. (2003) Embryonic and larval development of Gobius paganellus (Pisces: Gobiidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 11511156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, S., Tyler, C.R. and Sumpter, J.P. (1997) Egg quality in fish: what makes a good egg? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 7, 387416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, P. (1975) The neon gobies. The comparative biology of the gobies of the genus Gobiosoma, subgenus Elacatinus, (Pisces: Gobiidae) in the Tropical Western North Atlantic Ocean. Neptune City, NJ: TFH Publications.Google Scholar
Friedlander, A.M. (2001) Essential fish habitat and the effective design of marine reserves: application for marine ornamental fishes. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3, 135150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasparini, J.L., Floeter, S.R., Ferreira, C.E.L. and Sazima, I. (2005) Marine ornamental trade in Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 28832899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, J.A., Almany, G.R., Houck, L.D. and Hixon, M.A. (2003) Experimental analysis of monogamy in the Caribbean cleaner goby, Gobiosoma evelynae. Animal Behaviour 65, 865874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, J.G. (2003) Research on culturing the early life stages of marine ornamental fish. In Cato, J.C. and Brown, C.L. (eds) Marine ornamental species: collection, culture and conservation. Ames: Iowa State Press, pp. 251254.Google Scholar
IBAMA (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis) (2004) Instrução normativa n°5, de 21 de maio de 2004. Brasília: Brazil, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Lavens, P., Lebegue, E., Jaunet, H., Brunel, A., Dhert, P.H. and Sorgeloos, P. (1999) Effect of dietary essential fatty acids and vitamins on egg quality in turbot broodstocks. Aquaculture International 7, 225240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lem, A. (2001) International trade in ornamental fish. In Cato, J.C., Corbin, J. and Wilhelm, S. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International conference on marine ornamentals: collection, culture and conservation, Orlando, Florida, 26 November–1 December, pp. 54–54.Google Scholar
Moe, M.A. (2003) Culture of marine ornamentals: for love, for money and for science. In Cato, J.C. and Brown, C.L. (eds) Marine ornamental species: collection, culture and conservation. Ames: Iowa State Press, pp. 1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyle, P.B. and Cech, J.J. (1988) Fishes: an introduction to ichthyology. 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nelson, J.S. (1994) Fishes of the world. 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons SA.Google Scholar
Olivotto, I., Zenobi, A., Rollo, A., Migliarini, A., Avella, M. and Carnevali, O. (2005) Breeding, rearing and feeding studies in the cleaner goby Gobiosoma evelynae. Aquaculture 250, 175182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivotto, I., Rollo, A., Sulpizio, R., Avella, M., Tosti, L. and Carnevalli, O. (2006) Breeding and rearing the sunrise dottyback Pseudochromis flavivertex: the importance of live prey enrichment during larval development. Aquaculture 255, 480487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrowski, A.C. and Laidley, C.W. (2001) Application of marine foodfish techniques in marine ornamental aquaculture: reproduction and larval first feeding. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3, 191204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubec, P.J., Cruz, F., Pratt, V., Oellers, R., McCullough, B. and Lallo, F. (2001) Cyanide-free net-caught fish for the marine aquarium trade. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3, 3751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, K.U., Deepak, P.K., Negi, R.S., Singh, S. and Kapoor, D. (2006) Captive breeding of endangered fish Chitala chitala (Hamilton-Buchanan) for species conservation and sustainable utilization. Biodiversity and Conservation 15, 35793589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sazima, I., Moura, R.L. and Rosa, R.S. (1996) Elacatinus figaro sp. n. (Perciformes: Gobiidae), a new cleaner goby from the coast of Brazil. Aqua: Journal of Ichthyology and Aquatic Biology 2, 3338.Google Scholar
Sazima, I., Sazima, C., Francini-Filho, R.B. and Moura, R.L. (2000) Daily cleaning activity and diversity of clients of the barber goby, Elacatinus figaro, on rocky reefs in Southeastern Brazil. Environmental Biology of Fishes 59, 6977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senoo, S., Kaneko, M., Cheah, S.H. and Ang, K.J. (1994) Egg development, and larval development of marble goby Oxyeleotris marmoratus under artificial rearing conditions. Fisheries Science 60, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheng, J., Lin, Q., Chen, Q., Shen, L. and Lu, J. (2007) Effect of starvation on the initiation of feeding, growth and survival rate of juvenile seahorses, Hippocampus trimaculatus Leach and Hippocampus kuda Bleeker. Aquaculture 271, 469478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, O.K.K. and Lam, T.J. (1973) Induced breeding and early development of the marble goby (Oxyeleotris marmorata, Blk.). Aquaculture 2, 411423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavarutmaneegul, P. and Lin, C.K. (1988) Breeding and rearing of sand goby (Oxyeleotris marmoratus Blk.) fry. Aquaculture 69, 299305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tlusty, M. (2002) The benefits and risks of aquacultural production for the aquarium trade. Aquaculture 205, 203219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenti, R.J. (1972) The embryology of the neon goby, Gobiosoma oceanops. Copeia 3, 477482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wabnitiz, C., Taylo, M., Green, E. and Razak, T. (2003) From ocean to aquarium. The global trade in marine ornamental species. Cambridge, UK: UNEP–World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 66 pp.Google Scholar
Whiteman, E.A. and Côté, I.M. (2003) Social monogamy in the cleaning goby Elacatinus evelynae: ecological constraints or net benefit? Animal Behaviour 66, 281291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenrich, M.L. (2007) The complete illustrated breeder's guide to marine aquarium fishes. Neptune City, NJ: TFH Publications.Google Scholar
Wittenrich, M.L., Turingan, R.G. and Creswell, R.L. (2007) Spawning, early development and first feeding in the gobiid fish Priolepis nocturna. Aquaculture 270, 132141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar