Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:13:01.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New records of Opechona sp. metacercariae (Digenea: Trematoda) on hydromedusae from south Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2013

Miodeli Nogueira Júnior*
Affiliation:
Instituto Oceanográfico, Departamento de Oceanografia Biológica, Universidade de São Paulo, Praça do Oceanográfico, 191, Cidade Universitária, CEP 05508-120, São Paulo, Brazil
Luciana Diaz-Briz
Affiliation:
CONICET—Estación Costera Nágera, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales—Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina
Maria Angélica Haddad
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Zoologia, Centro Politécnico, Curitiba, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Nogueira Júnior, Instituto Oceanográfico, Departamento de Oceanografia Biológica, Universidade de São Paulo, Praça do Oceanográfico, 191, Cidade Universitária, CEP 05508-120, São Paulo, Brasil email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Six new records of hydromedusae are reported as secondary hosts of Opechona sp. (Lepocreadiidae) for the Brazilian coast. Among the 392 hydromedusae sampled, 43 (~11%) were harbouring metacercaria. Prevalence (P) and intensity of infection (I) of Opechona sp. varied considerably among the different host species. Gossea brachymera (Limnomedusae) was highly parasitized (P = 30%; I = 1–7), while the other five hydromedusae species were not (P = 1.5–10; I = 1–2). The high parasitism in G. brachymera suggests the importance of this species in the transmission of Opechona sp. to fish, the definitive hosts, and highlights the hydromedusae as a probable noteworthy food item for zooplanktivorous fish in the area.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bray, R.A. and Gibson, D.I. (1990) The Lepocreadiidae (Digenea) of fishes of the north-east Atlantic: review of the genera Opechona Looss, 1907 and Prodistomum Linton, 1910. Systematic Parasitology 15, 159202.Google Scholar
Bush, A.O., Lafferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M. and Shostak, A.W. (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Briz, L., Martorelli, S., Genzano, G. and Mianzan, H. (2012) Parasitism (Trematoda, Digenea) in medusae from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean, medusa hosts, parasite prevalences, and ecological implications. Hydrobiologia 690, 215226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez del Prado-Rosas, Ma. del C., Segura-Puertas, L., Álvarez-Cadena, J.N. and Lamothe-Argumedo, R. (2000) Opechona pyriforme metacercaria (Trematoda, Lepocreadiidae) in Eirene lactea (Cnidaria, Hydroidomedusae) from a reef lagoon in the mexican Caribbean Sea. Annales del Instituto de Biologia Univeridade Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Zoologia 71, 16.Google Scholar
Kohn, A., Fernandes, B.M.M. and Cohen, S.C. (2007) South American trematodes parasites of fishes. Rio de Janeiro: Imprinta Express Ltda.Google Scholar
Køie, M. (1975) On the morphology and life-history of Opechona bacillaris (Molin, 1859) Looss, 1907 (Trematoda, Lepocreadiidae). Ophelia 13, 6386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcogliese, D.J. (1995) The role of zooplankton in the transmission of helminths parasites to fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 5, 336371.Google Scholar
Marcogliese, D.J. (2002) Food webs and the transmission of parasites to marine fish. Parasitology 124, S83S99.Google Scholar
Martell-Hernández, L.F., Ocaña-Luna, A. and Sánchez-Ramírez, M. (2011) Seasonal occurrence of Opechona pyriforme metacercariae (Digenea, Lepocreadiidae) in Eirene tenuis medusae (Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from a hypersaline lagoon in western Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 97, 6871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martorelli, S.R. (2001) Digenea parasites of jellyfish and ctenophores of the southern Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 451, 305310.Google Scholar
Mianzan, H.W., Mari, N., Prenski, B. and Sanchez, F. (1996) Fish predation on neritic ctenophores from the Argentina continental shelf, a neglected food resource? Fisheries Research 27, 6979.Google Scholar
Morandini, A.C., Matorelli, S.R., Marques, A.C. and Silveira, F.L. (2005) Digenean metacercaria (Trematoda, Digenea, Lepocreadiidae) parasitizing 'coelenterates' (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa and Ctenophora) from southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 53, 3945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueira, M. Jr and Haddad, M.A. (2008) The diet of Cubomedusae (Cnidaria, Cubozoa) in southern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 56, 157164.Google Scholar
Ohtsuka, S., Koike, K., Lindsey, D., Nishikawa, J., Myiake, H., Kawahara, M., Mulyadi, M., Mujiono, N., Hiromi, J. and Komatsu, H. (2009) Symbionts of marine medusae and ctenophores. Plankton and Benthos Research 4, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rózsa, L., Reiczigel, J. and Majoros, G. (2000) Quantifying parasites in sample of hosts. Journal of Parasitology 86, 228232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlitzer, R. (2012) Ocean Data View. Available from http://www.odv.awi.de (accessed 9 August 2012).Google Scholar