Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:29:23.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Road More Popular versus the Road Less Travelled: An ‘Insider's’ Perspective of Advancing Chinese Management Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Bor-Shiuan Cheng ,
An-Chih Wang  and
Min-Ping Huang
Bor-Shiuan Cheng
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University, Taiwan
An-Chih Wang
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Min-Ping Huang
Affiliation:
Yuan Ze University, Taiwan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To complement Barney and Zhang's as well as Whetten's articles in this issue of Management and Organization Review, we offer ways to develop indigenous management theory to explain unique Chinese management phenomena. We first briefly review the imbalance of developing theories of Chinese management versus developing Chinese theories of management in Chinese research societies. We then describe a five-step research process that uses an indigenous research approach to theory development: discovery of interesting phenomena, field observations, construction of the theoretical framework, empirical examination, and theory refinement. This process may be useful not only in the Chinese context, but also in any other context. We identify several challenges in both Chinese and international academic societies that must be overcome to facilitate learning across the two approaches proposed by Barney and Zhang: the need for high quality journals in the Chinese language, international journals' efforts to ease the imbalance between the two approaches, and collaboration between Chinese and Western management schools.

Keywords

Chinese management researchChinese theory of managementemic approachindigenous research approachpaternalistic leadershiptheory development华人管理研究本土研究取径本位取径理论发展华人本土管理理论家长式领导
Type
Commentaries
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 91 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barney, J. B., & Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. 1990. Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Chan, W. S. 1963. A source book in Chinese philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F.J. 2005. Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organization Science, 16(4): 434–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. C. 1995. New trends in rewards allocation preferences: A Sino-U.S. comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 408–428.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S. 1995a. The relationship between authoritarianism and leadership: Evidence from Taiwan. Research report for the project awarded by the National Science Council, Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: National Science Council. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S. 1995b. Paternalistic authority and leadership: A case study of a Taiwanese CEO. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica, 79(1): 119–173. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., & Chou, L. F. 2006. Exploring paternalistic leadership: A full-cycle research approach. Paper presented at the Conference of the Development of Chinese Indigenous Psychology, Taipei, Taiwan, November 2006.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. 2004. Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1): 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Jiang, D. Y., & Cheng, H. Y. (Eds.) 2007. Organizational behavior studies in Taiwan (2nd ed.). Taipei: Hwa Tai Publishing. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Cheng, H. Y. 2007. Research on intragroup conflict management in Taiwan. In Cheng, B. S., Jiang, D. Y. & Cheng, H. Y. (Eds.), Organizational behavior studies in Taiwan (2nd ed.): 340–375. Taipei: Hwa Tai Publishing. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. 1980. Full-cycle social psychology. In Bickman, L. (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual, vol. 1: 21–47. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cooke, F. L. 2008. Enterprise culture management in China: Insider's perspective. Management and Organization Review, 4(2): 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. 2000. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Li, J. T., Tsui, A. S. & Weldon, E. (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context: 85–127. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3): 421–444.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. 2004. Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2): 241–253.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. 2007. Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcomes relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3): 715–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. 2008. Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In Chen, C. C. & Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 171–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. 2007. Cross-cultural organizational behavior. In Fiske, S. T., Kasdin, A. E. & Schacter, D. L. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 58: 479–514. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Huang, M. P. 2007. Research on leadership in Taiwan. In Cheng, B. S., Jiang, D. Y. & Cheng, H. Y. (Eds.), Organizational behavior studies in Taiwan (2nd ed.): 248–279. Taipei: Hwa Tai Publishing. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 413–439.Google Scholar
Liu, S. 2003. Culture witiiin culture: Unity and diversity of two generations of employees in state-owned enterprises. Human Relations, 56(4): 387–417.Google Scholar
Nifadkar, S. S., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. Book reviews: Great minds in management: The process of theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 298–312.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. 2008. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3): 566–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Y. Q., Chen, C. C., & Yang, X. H. 2008. Bridging Confucianism and Legalism: Xunzi's philosophy of sage-kingship. In Chen, C. C. & Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 51–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, G. 2008. Separating culture from institutions: The use of semantic spaces as a conceptual domain and the case of China. Management and Organization Review, 4(2): 257–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2005. Great minds in management: The process of theory development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Starr, J. B. 2001. Understanding China: A guide to China's economy, history, and political culture (2nd ed.). New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2007. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the Academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1353–1364.Google Scholar
Wa, Y., & Esherick, J. W. 1996. Chinese archives: An introductory guide. Berkeley, CA: Institute of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. L. 1971. The logic of science in sociology. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R., Wang, D. X., & Chen, Z. X. 2005. Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): 420–432.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.Google Scholar
Xiao, Z. X., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. Where brokers may not work: The culture contingency of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. 2007. 100 Tang and Song ci poems. Beijing: China Translation and Publication Corporation.Google Scholar
Yeh, C. C. 2008. The fusion of globalization and localization: Examining the indigenous approach to research on social science. In Yang, C. F. (Ed.), Indigenous approaches to Chinese psychology: 53–76. Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Yu, T. H. 2004. My working experiences in human resources management. Paper presented at the Seminar on Industrial and Organizational Psychology during the annual meeting of the Taiwanese Psychological Association, Taipei, October 2004.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. 1998. Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar