Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:09:59.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rise of SASAC: Asset Management, Ownership Concentration, and Firm Performance in China's Capital Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Junmin Wang
Affiliation:
University of Memphis, USA
Doug Guthrie
Affiliation:
George Washington University, USA
Zhixing Xiao
Affiliation:
China European International Business School, China

Abstract

Since the mid 1990s the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) has emerged as a key institution governing firm ownership in China, but its impact on firm performance is understudied. Through an analysis of Chinese firms listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 1994-2003, we examine how the changing ownership patterns following the rise of SASAC influenced firm performance. We have three findings. First, contrary to the popular view that state ownership in China's listed firms has declined, we find that the state shares have been moved from the original state offices to the SASAC in the format of ‘state institutional shares’. Second, compared with the old state shares, the SASAC institutions affect firm performance more positively. Third, after controlling for state and SASAC ownership, ownership concentration is a strong positive factor in firm performance. Our findings fit squarely within a long tradition of agency theorists who argue that ownership concentration helps solve the free-rider problem and thus has positive effects on firm performance. However, we focus on the ways in which ownership concentration allows firm owners to monitor and stabilize firm behaviour, which has more important implications for emerging economies such as China's domestic capital markets.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. 1999. Does corporate ownership structure affect its strategy towards diversification? Strategic Management Journal, 20(11): 10631069.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. 1995. Economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beamish, P. W., & Delios, A. 2005. Selling China: Looking back and looking forward. Management and Organization Review, 1(2): 309313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O., Boycko, M., Dabrowski, M., Dornbusch, R., Layard, R., & Shleifer, A. 1993. Postcommunist reform: Pain and progress. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boardman, A. E., & Vining, A. R. 1989. Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32: 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. 1993. Performance and successor choice: The moderating effects of governance and ownership. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(1): 172186.Google Scholar
Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. 1997. Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3): 693728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. 2000. Agency conflicts in public and negotiated transfers of corporate control. The Journal of Finance, 55(2): 647677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Y. Z., Fan, G., & Woo, W. T. 1997. Chinese economic reforms: Past successes and future challenges. In Woo, WT, Parker, S & Sachs, J (Eds.), Economies in transition: Comparing Asia and Eastern Europe: 1940. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Che, J., & Qian, Y. 1998. Insecure property rights and government ownership of firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2): 467496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, K., Wang, H., Zheng, Y., Jefferson, G. H., & Rawski, T. G. 1988. Productivity change in Chinese industry: 1953–1985. Journal of Comparative Economics, 12: 570591.Google Scholar
China Securities Regulatory Commission. 2009. China securities and futures statistical yearbook. Shanghai: Xuelin Publisher.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. 1992. Privatization in Eastern European transformation. In Clague, C. & Rausser, G. C. (Eds.), The emergence of market economies in Eastern Europe: 227243. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fischer, S., & Gelb, A. 1991. The process of socialist economic transformation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4: 91106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N, & Zhang, J. 2011. A new agenda for research on the trajectory of Chinese capitalism. Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 3962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydman, R., Gray, C., Hessel, M., & Rapaczynski, A. 1999. When does privatization work? The impact of private ownership on corporate performance in the transition economies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4): 1153–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, D. 1997. Between markets and politics: Organizational responses to reform in China. American Journal of Sociology, 102: 12581303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, D. 1999. Dragon in a three-piece suit: The emergence of capitalism in China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, D. 2005. Organizational learning and productivity: State structure and foreign investment in the rise of the Chinese corporation. Management and Organization Review, 1(2): 165195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, D. 2006. China and globalization: The economic, political, and social transformation of Chinese society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D., & Wang, J. 2007. Business organizations in China. In Yeung, H. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Asian Business: 99121. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D., Xiao, Z., & Wang, J. 2009. Asset management and productivity in reformera China. Research in the Sociology of Work. 19: 3569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6): 12511271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holz, C. A. 2002. China's industrial state-owned enterprises: Between profitability and bankruptcy. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keister, L. A. 1998. Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China's transition economy. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2): 404440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keister, L. A. 2000. Chinese business groups: The structure and impact of interfirm relations during economic development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., & Walker, G. 2001. The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. American Sociological Review, 66(3): 317335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, J. 1980. The shortage economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. 1990. The road to a free economy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Li, S., Xia, J., Long, C., & Tan, J. forthcoming. Control modes and outcomes of transformed state-owned enterprises in China: An empirical test. Management and Organization Review, article first published online: 13 JUL 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.l740-8784. 2011.00232.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, N. 2011. Capitalism in China: A centrally managed capitalism (CMC) and its future. Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 6396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megginson, W. L., Nash, R. C., & Randenborgh, M. V. 1994. The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: An international empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 49:403452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M. W. 2011. Is it capitalism? Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton, B. 1995. Growing out of the plan: Chinese economic reform, 1978-1993. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, V. 1992. Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(March): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oi, J. C. 1989. State and peasant in contemporary China: The political economy of village and government. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Oi, J. C. 1992. Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism. World Politics, 45: 99126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oi, J. C. 1995. The role of the local state in China's transitional economy. China Quarterly, 144: 11321149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, G., Robert, A. E., Stijn, C, & Djankov, S. 1997. Privatization and restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence and policy options. World Bank Technical Paper. No. 368. World Bank: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., & Roland, G. 1998. Federalism and the soft budget constraint. American Economic Review, 88(5): 11431162.Google Scholar
Rawski, T. G. 1994. Progress without privatization: The reform of China's state industries. In Milor, V. (Ed.), Changing political economies: Privatization in post-communist and reforming communist states: 2752. Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner.Google Scholar
Rawski, T. G. 1995. Implications of China's reform experience. China Quarterly, 144: 11501173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawski, T. G. 1999. Reforming China's economy: What have we learned? The China Journal, 41: 139156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D. 1992. Privatization in Russia: Some lessons from Eastern Europe. American Economic Review, 80: 4348.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. D. 1993. Poland's jump to the market economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D. 1995a. Consolidating capitalism. Foreign Policy, 98: 5064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D. 1995b. Reforms in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union in light of the East Asian experience. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 9: 454485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D., & Woo, W. T. 1994a. Experiences in the transition to a market economy. Journal of Comparative Economics, 18(3): 271275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D., & Woo, W. T. 1994b. Structural factors in the economic reforms of China, Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union. Economic Policy, 9(18): 101131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D., & Woo, W. T. 1997. Understanding China's economic performance. Working Paper Series, no. 5935, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Working Paper Series. SASAC. 2011. A list of central SOEs in Chinese. [Last accessed 2 May 2011.] Available from URL: http://www.sasac.gov.en/n 1180/n 1226/n2425/index.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleifer, A, & Vishny, R. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3): 461488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinfeld, E. S. 1998. Forging reform in China: The fate of state-owned industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. 2000. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal , 21(6): 689705.Google Scholar
Walder, A. 1995. Local governments as industrial firms: An organizational analysis of China's transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 101(2): 263301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walder, A. 2011. From control to ownership: China's managerial revolution. Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. 2009. Global-market building as state building: China's entry into the WTO and market reforms of China's tobacco industry. Theory and Society, 38(2): 165194.Google Scholar
Woo, W. T. 1997. Improving the performance of enterprises in transition economies. In Woo, W. T., Parker, S. & Sachs, J. (Eds.), Economies in transition: Comparing Asia and Eastern Europe: 299324. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Woo, W. T. 1999. The real reasons for China's growth. The China Journal, 41: 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, W. T., Parker, S., & Sachs, J. 1997. Economies in transition: Comparing Asia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 196–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar