Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:55:45.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Peer-review Process: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, and the Extraordinary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2015

Arie Y. Lewin
Arie Y. Lewin*
Affiliation:
Duke University, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorials on Reviewing
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , July 2014 , pp. 167 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2014

References

Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. 2008. Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organization Science Perspectives, 19(1): 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, P. S. 2014. The developmental reviewer. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 175–181.Google Scholar
Judge, W. Q., Fainshmidt, S., & Brown, J. L. 2014. Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality? Journal of International Business Studies, 45(4): 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Weigelt, C. B., & Emery, J. B. 2004. Adaptation and selection in strategy and change: Perspectives on strategic change in organizations. In Poole, M. S. & Van de Ven, A. H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation: 108–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, L. A. 2014. Addressing reviewer comments as an integrative negotiation. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. 2005. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management and Organization Review, 1(1): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starbuck, W. H. 2005. How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16(2): 180–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, E. W. K. 2014. Ensuring manuscript quality and preserving authorial voice: A balancing act of edits. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 191–197.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2013. The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 9(3): 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Patton, D., & Kenney, M. 2013. Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project. Research Policy, 42(3): 765–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar