Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:57:10.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paternalistic Leadership, Team Conflict, and TMT Decision Effectiveness: Interactions in the Chinese Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2015

Lu Chen ,
Baiyin Yang  and
Runtian Jing
Lu Chen*
Affiliation:
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China
Baiyin Yang
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University, China
Runtian Jing
Affiliation:
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
*
Corresponding author: Lu Chen ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we propose that types of CEO paternalistic leadership will affect the effectiveness of top management team (TMT) decisions, and that team conflict will play a mediating role in the relationship between CEO paternalistic leadership and decision effectiveness in the Chinese context. Data collected from 108 TMTs in China suggest that dimensions of paternalistic leadership significantly affect decision effectiveness: benevolent and moral leadership positively affect TMT decision effectiveness, but authoritarian leadership has negative effects on TMT decision effectiveness. In addition, cognitive and affective team conflicts partially mediate the links between paternalistic leadership types and decision effectiveness. The results suggest that CEO paternalistic leadership approaches and conflict modes significantly determine TMT decision effectiveness.

Keywords

decision effectivenesspaternalistic leadershipteam conflicttop management team
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 11 , Issue 4: Special Issue Expanding Research on Family Business in China , December 2015 , pp. 739 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amason, A. C. 1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the demography of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10: 107–124.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beamer, L. 1998. Bridging business cultures. Chinese Business Review , May–June: 54–58.Google Scholar
Becker, G. K. 2007. The competitive edge of moral leadership. International Management Review, 3: 50–86.Google Scholar
Belsley, D., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. 1980. Regression diagnostics. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, A., Schaubroeck, J., & Tishler, A. 2011. How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22: 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, A., Tishler, A., & Edmondson, A. C. 2012. CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organization, 10: 31–54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, S. C., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. K. 2013. The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates’ organization-based self-esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34: 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. 2010. From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (2): 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Liu, C., & Tjosvold, D. 2005. Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 277–300.Google Scholar
Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. B., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40: 796–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. 2000. A trial model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14: 3–64 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Huang, M. P., Wu, T. Y., & Farh, J. L. 2004. Paternalistic leadership and subordinate reverence: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7: 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Chou, L. F. 2002. Paternalistic leadership and its effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese organizational teams. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 3: 85–112 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. 1999. Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125: 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. 2006. When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. 2003. A contingency theory of task conflict and performance in groups and organizational teams. In West, M. A., Tjosvold, D., & Smith, K. (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working: 151–166. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. 2001. Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1191–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ensley, M. D., & Pearce, C. L. 2001. Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 145–155.Google Scholar
Erben, G. S., & Guneser, A. B. 2008. The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82: 955–968.Google Scholar
Fang, T. 2012. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8 (1): 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. 2000. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Li, J. T.., Tsui, A. S., & Weldon, E. (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context: 84–127. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Chu, X. P. 2006. Authority and benevolence: employees' responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In Tsui, A. S., Bian, Y. & Cheng, L. (Eds), China's domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance: 230–260. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. 2008. Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In Chen, C. C. & Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and Management in China Philosophies, Theories, and Practices: 171–205. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. B., Flood, P. C., Hmaccurtain, S., Jeremydawson, A., & West, M. 2005. CEO leadership, top team trust and the combination and exchange of information. Irish Journal of Management, 26: 22–40.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1990. Top-management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 484–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1996. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis, MN: West.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Leslie, L. M., Keller, K., & De Dreu, C. 2012. Conflict cultures in organizations: How leaders shape conflict cultures and their organizational-level consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97 (6): 1131–1147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, J. M. 1990. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. 2005. Upper echelon theory: Origin, twists and turns, and lessons learned. In Smith, K. G. & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development: 109–127. New York: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group inter-rater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. 2008. The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17: 465–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Henry, P. S., Smith, K. A., Flood, P. 1999. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 445–465.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. 1995. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in top management teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Franz, T. M. 1998. Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision making groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 482–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, B. S. 1997. The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4 (3): 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P., Leung, K., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J. D. 2012. Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organization Review, 8 (1): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, J. G., & Hambrick, D.C. 1992. Diversification posture and the characteristics of the top management team. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., Burke, L., & Glick, W. 1998. Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 39–58.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. 2010. Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36: 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. 2001. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108: 291–310.Google Scholar
Parayitam, S., & Dooley, R. S. 2009. The interplay between cognitive-and affective conflict and cognition-and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62: 789–796.Google Scholar
Pelled, L. H. 1996. Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7: 230–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. 2008. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34: 566–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. S., Smith, D. B., Martorana, P. V., & Owens, P. D. 2003. The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 795–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommendation remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priem, R. D., Lyon, D.W., & Dess, G. G. 1999. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25: 935–953.Google Scholar
Redding, S. G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. 2006. Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91: 1080–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silin, R. H. 1976. Leadership and value: the organization of large-scale Taiwan enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. 2000. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The role of intra group trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, M.E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Leinhardt, S. (Ed.), Sociological methodology, 290–312. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Song, L. J., Zhang, X. & Wu, J. B. 2014. A multilevel analysis of middle manager performance: The role of CEO and top manager leadership. Management and Organization Review, 10 (2): 275–297.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Law, K. S., & Sun, H. 2006. Effectiveness of Chinese teams: The role of conflict types and conflict management approaches. Management and Organization Review, 2 (2): 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., & Jing, R. 2011. Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective. Management and Organization Review, 8 (1): 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, H., Euwema, M. C., & Hatty van Emmerik, I. J. 2009. Leadership and team cohesiveness across culture. The Leadership Quarterly, 20: 358–370.Google Scholar
Westwood, R. I. 1997. Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18: 445–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K.A. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Grifen, R. W. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, M., Huang, X., Li, C. W., & Liu, W. 2011. Perceived international justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management and Organizational Review, 8 (1): 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, T. Y., Hsu, W. L., & Cheng, B. S. 2002. Expressing or suppressing anger: Subordinate's anger responses to supervisor's authoritarian behaviors in a Taiwan enterprise. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 18: 3–49 (in Chinese).Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Chen supplementary material

Translated abstracts

Download Chen supplementary material(File)
File 14.1 KB