Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:20:43.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lose-Lose Consequence: Assessing US-China Trade Decoupling through the Lens of Global Value Chains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2021

Yimei Hu Open the ORCID record for Yimei Hu [Opens in a new window] ,
Kailan Tian ,
Tian Wu  and
Cuihong Yang
Yimei Hu*
Affiliation:
Aalborg University Business School, Aalborg University, Denmark
Kailan Tian
Affiliation:
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Tian Wu
Affiliation:
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Cuihong Yang
Affiliation:
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
*
Corresponding author: Yimei Hu ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Dialogue, Debate, and Discussion
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 17 , Special Issue 2: Business Model Innovation in Transforming Economies , May 2021 , pp. 429 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

accepted by Deputy Editor Peter Ping Li

References

REFERENCES

Baldwin, R. 2016. The great convergence. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cadestin, C., De Backer, K., Desnoyers-James, I., Miroudot, S., Rigo, D., & Ye, M. 2018. Multinational enterprises and global value chains: The OECD analytical AMNE database. OECD Trade Policy Papers. No. 211, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Chen, W., Los, B., McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R., Thissen, M., & van Oort, F. 2018. The continental divide? Economic exposure to Brexit in regions and countries on both sides of the channel. Papers in Regional Science, 97(1): 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietzenbacher, E., van Burken, B., & Kondo, Y. 2019. Hypothetical extractions from a global perspective. Economic Systems Research, 31(4): 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupont, A. 2020. New Cold War: De-risking US-China conflict. Hinrich Foundation. Available from URL: https://www.hinrichfoundation.com/research/wp/us-china/new-cold-war/Google Scholar
The Economist. 2020a. China v America: Doing business with China. [Cited 19 February 2021]. Available from URL: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/07/18/china-v-americaGoogle Scholar
The Economist. 2020b. Will TikTok survive? [Cited 19 February 2021]. Available from URL: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/09/19/will-tiktok-surviveGoogle Scholar
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1):78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helberg, J. 2020. Silicon Valley can't be neutral in the US-China Cold War: Firms like Zoom show that ‘one company, two systems’ doesn't work. Foreign Policy. [Cited 23 June 2020]. Available from URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/22/zoom-china-us-cold-warunsafe/?utm_source=PostUp&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=22522&utm_term=EditorsGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. C., & Noguera, G. 2012. Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added. Journal of International Economics, 86(2): 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kano, L. 2018. Global value chain governance: A relational perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6), 684–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. J. 2014. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. American Economic Review, 104(2): 459–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. 2019. Towards economic decoupling? Mapping Chinese discourse on the China-US trade war. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12: 519–556.Google Scholar
Los, B., Timmer, M. P., & de Vries, G. J. 2016. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports: Comment. American Economic Review, 106(7): 1958–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schell, O. 2020. The ugly end of Chimerica: The coronavirus pandemic has turned a conscious uncoupling into a messy breakup. Foreign Policy, Spring Issue: 26–29.Google Scholar
Tian, K. L., Dietzenbacher, E., & Jong-A-Pin, R. 2019. Measuring industrial upgrading: Applying factor analysis in a global value chain framework. Economic Systems Research, 31(4): 642–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, P. 2021. De-Globalisation and decoupling: Post-COVID-19 myths versus realities. Management and Organization Review, 17(1): 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A. 2019. China's challenge: Geopolitics, de-globalization, and the future of Chinese business. Management and Organization Review, 15(4): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A. 2019. De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7): 1053–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A., Li, P. P., Välikangas, L., & Lewin, A. Y. 2021. De-globalization and decoupling: Game changing consequences? Management and Organization Review, 17(1): 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woetzel, J., Seong, J., Leung, N., Ngai, J., Manyika, J., Madgavkar, A., Lund, S., & Mironenko, A. 2019. China and the world: Inside the dynamics of a changing relationship. Available from URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/china/china-and-the-world-inside-the-dynamics-of-a-changing-relationshipGoogle Scholar