Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:00:27.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation and Entrepreneurship in India: An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2019

Suresh Bhagavatula ,
Ram Mudambi  and
Johann Peter Murmann Open the ORCID record for Johann Peter Murmann [Opens in a new window]
Suresh Bhagavatula
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, India
Ram Mudambi
Affiliation:
Temple University, USA
Johann Peter Murmann*
Affiliation:
University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author: Johann Peter Murmann ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

India began the process of market liberalization that opened it to significant interactions with the world economy in 1991. In this essay, we provide an overarching view of the country's journey toward integration with the global innovation and entrepreneurship network. Major nodes in this global network have two major components that may be metaphorically referred to as ‘pillars and ivy’. Globally connected multinational enterprises (MNEs) form the pillars. Agile startups are the ivy, and their success (metaphorically, the height to which they can climb) depends on their symbiotic connections with the pillar MNEs. Both components are essential and reinforce each other. Without MNEs, the scaling of startups is hampered. Without a vibrant population of startups, MNEs’ interest in a location remains driven by cost, rather than capability and creativity. MNEs (mainly foreign) provided the initial sparks for the formation of the Indian innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem. We chart the subsequent growth of India's startups. They began in the information technology (IT) sector but now cover a much wider range of industries. Today, India's innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem is one of the largest in the world, with global integration in terms of technology, financing, human capital, and administration.

摘要

印度于1991年开始了市场自由化进程，从此开启了印度与世界经济互动的大门。在本研究中，我们对印度融入全球创新和创业网络历程提出了一个总体观点。在全球网络中主要节点包含两个重要组成成分，可以将其比喻为“支柱和常春藤”。全球跨国企业构成了支柱，初创企业是常春藤，它们的成功(打个比方，如它们能爬多高)取决于它们与跨国公司的共生关系。这两个组成部分是必不可少且相互促进的。没有跨国公司，初创企业的规模会受到限制；而没有一个充满活力的初创企业群，跨国公司对一个地区的兴趣只会受成本驱动，而不是该地区能力和创造力。跨国公司 (主要是外国公司)引发了印度创新和创业生态系统的形成。在本研究中，我们描绘了印度初创企业后续发展蓝图。这些初创企业始于信息技术(IT)领域，但现在涵盖了更多行业。如今，印度的创新和创业生态系统已成为世界上最大的生态系统之一，而且在技术、金融、人力资本和管理方面实现了全球一体化。

Keywords

connectivityentrepreneurship ecosystemsglobal linkagesmultinational firmsnational systems of innovationstartups连通性创业生态系统全球联系跨国公司国家创新系统初创企业
Type
Special Issue Introduction
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 15 , Special Issue 3: The Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in India , September 2019 , pp. 467 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agrawal, P. 2015. Infrastructure in India: Challenges and the way ahead. Institute of Economic Growth, Working Paper 350.Google Scholar
Alcacer, J., & Oxley, J. 2014. Learning by supplying. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2): 204–223.Google Scholar
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. 2005. The globalization of the software industry: Perspectives and opportunities for developed and developing countries. Innovation Policy, 5: 1–32.Google Scholar
Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. 2001. What's new about the New Economy? Sources of growth in managed and entrepreneurial economics. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1): 267–315.Google Scholar
Awate, S., & Mudambi, R. 2018. On the geography of emerging industry technological networks: the breadth and depth of patented innovations. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(2): 391–419.Google Scholar
Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. 2012. EMNE catch-up strategies in the wind turbine industry: Is there a trade-off between output and innovation capabilities? Global Strategy Journal, 2(3): 205–223.Google Scholar
Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. 2015. Accessing vs. sourcing knowledge: A comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 63–86.Google Scholar
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31–56.Google Scholar
Brandl, K., Darendeli, I., & Mudambi, R. 2019. Foreign actors and intellectual property protection regulations in developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(5): 826–846.Google Scholar
Brandl, K., Mudambi, R., & Scalera, V. 2015. The spectacular rise of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Entrepreneur & Innovation Exchange, December.Google Scholar
Breslin, S. 2007. China and global political economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cano-Kollmann, M., Hannigan, T.J., & Mudambi, R. 2018. Global innovation networks: Organizations and people. Journal of International Management, 24(2): 87–92.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109–1128.Google Scholar
CB Insights. 2018. The global unicorn club. [Cited 10 August 2019]. Available from URL:https://www.cbinsights.com/research-unicorn-companies/Google Scholar
Custer, C. 2018. China startup funding on pace to smash records in 2018. August 9. TechiInAsia.com. [Cited 10 August 2019]. Available from URL: https://www.techinasia.com/china-startup-funding-set-to-smash-records-2018/Google Scholar
Dahlman, C., & Utz, A. 2005. India and knowledge economy: Leveraging strengths and opportunities. Washington DC: World Bank Institute.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. 2008. Multinational enterprises and global economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Fan, Z., & Zhang, X. 2004. Infrastructure and regional economic development in rural China. China Economic Review, 15(2): 203–214.Google Scholar
Forbes. 2019. Billionaires: The richest people in the world. [Cited on 19 May 2019]. Available from URL: https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/#d349470251c7Google Scholar
Fu, X., Pietrobelli, C., & Loete, L. 2011. The role of foreign technology and indigenous innovation in emerging economies: Technological change and catching-up. World Development, 39(7): 1204–1212.Google Scholar
Goswami, K., Mitchell, J. R., & Bhagavatula, S. 2018. Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1): 117–150.Google Scholar
Huang, Y., & Khanna, T. 2003. Can India overtake China? Foreign Affairs, 137(July-August): 74–81.Google Scholar
Kedia, B., Mukherjee, D., & Lahiri, S. 2006. Indian business groups: Evolution and transformation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): 559–577.Google Scholar
Kharas, H., Hamel, K., & Hofer, M. 2018. Future development: Rethinking global poverty reduction in 2019. Brookings Institution, Washington DC. [Cited 10 August 2019]. Available from URL: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2018/12/13/rethinking-global-poverty-reduction-in-2019/Google Scholar
Klepper, S., & Sleeper, S. 2005. Entry by spinoffs. Management Science, 51(8): 1291–1306.Google Scholar
Kumaraswamy, A., Mudambi, R., Saranga, H., & Tripathy, A. 2012. Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4): 36–395.Google Scholar
Lall, S., & Mohammad, S. 1983. Multinationals in Indian big business: Industrial characteristic of foreign investment in a heavily regulated economy. Journal of Development Economics, 13(1–2): 143–157.Google Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Kenney, M., & Murmann, J. P. 2016. China's innovation challenge: Overcoming the middle income trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. 2009. Why are offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6): 901–925.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. A. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. The Manchester School, 22(2): 139–191.Google Scholar
Lin, J. Y. 2016. New structural economics: The future of the Chinese economy. In Lewin, A. Y., Kenney, M., & Murmann, J. P. (Eds.), China's innovation challenge: Overcoming the middle income trap: 32–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, M. 2019. How early entrants impact cluster emergence: MNEs vs. local firms in the Bangalore digital creative industries. Management and Organization Review, 15(3): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2018.53Google Scholar
Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2010. Bangalore vs. Bollywood: Connectivity and catch-up in emerging market economies. AIB Insights, 10(1): 7–11.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2013. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 501–534.Google Scholar
March, J. G. 2005. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management and Organization Review, 1(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. E. 2015. Context in management research in emerging economies. Management and Organization Review, 11(3): 369–377.Google Scholar
Mudambi, R. 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5): 699–725.Google Scholar
Mudambi, R., Saranga, H., & Schotter, A. 2017. Mastering the Make-in-India challenge. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(4): 59–66.Google Scholar
Mukherji, R. 2009. The state, economic growth and development in India. India Review, 8(1): 81–106.Google Scholar
Murmann, J. P. 2003. Knowledge and competitive advantage: The coevolution of firms, technology, and national institutions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murmann, J. P. 2014. Reflections on choosing the appropriate level of abstraction in social science research. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 381–389.Google Scholar
Murmann, J. P., Ozdemir, S. Z., & Sardana, D. 2015. The role of home country demand in the internationalization of new ventures. Research Policy, 44(6): 1207–1225.Google Scholar
Narayanan, V. K., & Shin, J. N. 2019. The institutional context of incubation: The case of academic incubators in India. Management and Organization Review, 15(3): DOI:10.1017/mor.2018.52.Google Scholar
Narula, R. 2015. The viability of sustained growth by India's MNEs: India's dual economy and constraints from its locational assets. Management International Review, 55(2): 191–205.Google Scholar
NASSCOM. 2018. Indian Tech Startup Ecosystem. National Association of Software and Services Companies, Noida, India.Google Scholar
Parthasarathy, B., & Aoyama, Y. 2006. From software services to R&D services: local entrepreneurship in the software industry in Bangalore, India. Environment and Planning A, 38(7): 1269–1285.Google Scholar
Patibandla, M., & Petersen, B. 2002. The role of transnational corporations in the evolution of a high-tech industry: the case of India's software industry. World Development, 30(9): 1561–1577.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T. 1951. The economics of the international patent system. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Poojara, T. 2018. India bound: Here's why Chinese investors won't tighten their purse strings anytime soon. [Cited 15 April 2019]. Available from URL: https://yourstory.com/2018/11/china-investors-keen-india/Google Scholar
Prashantham, S., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Dancing with gorillas: How small companies can partner effectively with MNCs. California Management Review, 51(1): 6–23.Google Scholar
Prashantham, S., Kumar, K., & Bhattacharyya, S. 2019. International new ventures from emerging markets: connectivity and legitimacy building. Management and Organization Review, 15(3): DOI:10.1017/mor.2019.22Google Scholar
Prashantham, S., & Yip, G. 2017. Engaging with startups in emerging markets. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(2): 51–56.Google Scholar
Redding, G. 2016. Impact of China's invisible societal forces on its intended evolution. In Lewin, A. Y., Kenney, M., & Murmann, J. P. (Eds.), China's innovation challenge: Overcoming the middle income trap, 56–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sabarinathan, G. 2019. Angel investments in India–Trends, prospects and issues in the current economic backdrop. IIMB Management Review, 31(2): 200–214.Google Scholar
Sahasranamam, S., Rentala, S., & Rose, E. 2019. Knowledge sources and international business activity in a changing innovation ecosystem: A study of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Management and Organization Review, 15(3): DOI:10.1017/mor.2019.35Google Scholar
Schotter, A., Mudambi, R., Doz, Y., & Gaur, A. 2017. Boundary spanning in global organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 54(4): 403–421.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sheth, A., Singhal, A., & Taneja, P. 2014. India private equity report 2014. Mumbai: Bain & Co.Google Scholar
Surana, K., Singh, A., & Sagar, A. 2018. Enhancing S&T based entrepreneurship: The role of incubators and public policy. DST Centre for Public Policy, IIT Delhi.Google Scholar
Turkina, E., & Van Assche, A. 2019. An anatomy of Bengaluru's ICT cluster: A community detection approach. Management and Organization Review, 15(3): DOI:10.1017/mor.2019.34Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., Meyer, A. D., & Jing, R. 2018. Opportunities and challenges of engaged indigenous scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 14(3): 449–462.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Zweig, D., & Lin, X. 2011. Returnee entrepreneurs: Impact on China's globalization process. Journal of Contemporary China, 20(70): 413–431.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2019a. Poverty and Equity Portal. [Cited 19 May 2019]. Available from URL: http://povertydata.worldbank.org/poverty/home/Google Scholar
World Bank. 2019b. Data. [Cited 19 May 2019]. Available from URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?contextual=default&end=2017&locations=CN-IN&most_recent_year_desc=true&start=1989&view=chart/Google Scholar
World Bank. 2019c. Data. [Cited 19 May 2019]. Available from URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZSGoogle Scholar
Wright, M., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Filatotchev, I. 2007. Returnee entrepreneurs, science park location choice and performance: An analysis of high-technology SMEs in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1): 131–155.Google Scholar
YCombinator Blog. 2019. YCombinator interviews in India. [Cited 7 August 2019]. Available from URL: https://blog.ycombinator.com/yc-interviews-in-india/Google Scholar