Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:23:44.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Following the Old Road: Organizational Imprinting and the Regional Development of Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2021

Nooa Nykänen Open the ORCID record for Nooa Nykänen [Opens in a new window]
Nooa Nykänen*
Affiliation:
Aalto University, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I draw from organizational imprinting theory to illuminate the impact of the Soviet legacy on contemporary Russian economic geography and regional policy. I argue that central coordination in the creation and regulation of Russian urban agglomerations is connected to a socialist imprinted paradigm associated with the Soviet economic regionalization model and territorial-production complexes (TPCs). I conduct a qualitative historical study to analyze the role of the foundational environment and the dynamics in the development of this imprint. I propose that this imprint effect is prone to reproduction in contemporary regional development strategies and community-based paradigms due to exaptation and cultural-cognitive persistence. The article extends the literature of socialist imprinting by demonstrating how imprints may emerge, transform, and affect localized organizational communities in transition economies and highlights the role of imprinted paradigms in policymaking and regional development.

摘要

摘要

本文基于组织印记理论，阐述了苏联烙印对当代俄罗斯经济地理和区域政策的影响。本文认为，在俄罗斯城市群的创建和管理中，中央调控与苏联经济区化模型和地域生产综合体(TPCs)相关的社会主义印记范式有关。本文进行了定性的历史研究，分析基础环境的作用和这种印记在发展中的动力。本文认为由于扩展适应和文化认知的持久性，这种印记效应在当代区域发展战略和社区模式中易于被复制。本文扩展了社会主义印记的文献，论证了在转型经济中印记是怎样产生、改变和影响地方性组织社区的，并强调了印记范式在政策制定和区域发展中的作用。

Аннотация

АННОТАЦИЯ

В этой статье я использую теорию организационного импринтинга, чтобы прояснить влияние советского наследия на современную российскую экономическую географию и региональную политику. Я утверждаю, что основной принцип координации при создании и регулировании российских городских агломераций связан с закреплением социалистической парадигмы, которая имеет отношение к советской модели экономической регионализации и территориально-производственным комплексам (ТПК). Я провожу качественное историческое исследование, чтобы проанализировать роль основополагающей среды и динамику развития этого импринта. Я предполагаю, что этот эффект запечатления обычно воспроизводится в современных стратегиях регионального развития и парадигмах на уровне местных сообществ по причине экзаптации и культурно-когнитивной устойчивости. Данная работа расширяет литературу о социалистическом импринтинге и показывает, каким образом импринты могут возникать, трансформироваться и влиять на местные организационные сообщества в странах с переходной экономикой, а также подчеркивает особую роль парадигм импринтинга в разработке стратегического курса и региональном развитии.

Resumen

RESUMEN

En este artículo, me baso en la teoría de impronta organizacional para esclarecer el impacto del legado soviético en la geografía económica y la política regional rusa contemporánea. Argumento que la coordinación central en la creación y la regulación de las aglomeraciones urbanas rusas está conectada con un grabado paradigma socialista asociado con el modelo de regionalización económica soviético y los complejos territoriales de producción (TPC por sus iniciales en inglés). Realizo un estudio cualitativo histórico para analizar el papel del entorno fundacional y las dinámicas en el desarrollo de esta impronta. Propongo que este efecto de impronta es susceptible a reproducirse en estrategias de desarrollo regional contemporáneas y en los paradigmas comunitarios debido a la exaptación y a la persistencia cultural-cognitiva. Este artículo amplía la literatura de la impronta socialista al demostrar cómo las improntas pueden surgir, transformase y afecta las comunidades organizacionales localizadas en economías de transición y resalta el papel de los paradigmas grabados en la formulación de políticas y en el desarrollo regional.

Keywords

economic geographyorganizational collectivesRussiasocialist imprintingSoviet Uniontechnological paradigm经济地理组织的集体主义俄罗斯社会主义印记技术范式苏联экономическая географияорганизационные коллективыРоссиясоциалистический импринтингтехнологическая парадигмаСоветский Союз.geografía económicacolectivos organizacionalesRusiaimpronta socialistaparadigma tecnológicoUnión Soviética
Type
Article
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 583 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

ACCEPTED BY Senior Editor Sheila Puffer

References

REFERENCES

Abazov, R. 1999. Economic migration in post-Soviet Central Asia: The case of Kyrgyzstan. Post-Communist Economies, 11(2): 237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamesku, A. A. 2014. Novyi etap v Obosnovanii regional'nogo razvitiya. Sovremennye proizvoditel'nye sily, 2: 156–168.Google Scholar
Afonaseva, Ya., O., , & Romanenko, E. V. 2017. Evolyuciya territorial'noy aktivnosti predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti v osushsestvlenii processa neoindustrialicazii. Tekhnika I tekhnologii Stroitel'stva, 1(9): 142–49.Google Scholar
Aganbegyan, A. G., & Bandman, M. K. 1984. Territorial production complexes as integrated systems: Theory and practice. Geoforum, 15(1): 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agasisti, T., Egorov, A., Zinchenko, D., & Leshukov, O. 2020. Efficiency of regional higher education systems and regional economic short-run growth: Empirical evidence from Russia. Industry and Innovation, 1–28. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2020.1738914Google Scholar
Alampiev, P. M. 1963. Practical application of the work on economic regionalization in the USSR. In Dzieworski, K. & Wrabel, A. (Eds.), Methods of economic regionalization: 173–180. Warsaw: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Alampiyev, P. M. 1960. Tendencies in the development of major economic-geographic regions. Soviet Geography, 1(4): 43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A., & Fuchs-Schündeln, N. 2007. Goodbye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people's preferences. American Economic Review, 97(4): 1507–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allyn, B. 1990. Fact, value & science. In Graham, L. (Ed.), Science and the Soviet social order: 225–255. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Almandoz, J., Marquis, C., & Cheely, M. 2017. Drivers of community strength: An institutional logics perspective on geographical and affiliation based communities. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism : 190–213. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andriani, P., & Cattani, G. 2016. Exaptation as source of creativity, innovation, and diversity: Introduction to the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(1): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Animiza, E. G., & Denisova, O. Ju. 2014. Osmyslenie processov evolyucii form prostanstvennoy organizacii proizvoditel'nyh sil. Izvestiya UrGE, 56–61.Google Scholar
Applebaum, A. 2003. Gulag: A history. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Balabanova, E., Rebrov, A., & Koveshnikov, A. 2018. Managerial styles in privately owned domestic organizations in Russia: Heterogeneity, antecedents, and organizational implications. Management and Organization Review, 14(1): 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banalieva, E. R., Karam, C. M., Ralston, D. A., Elenkov, D., Naoumova, I., Dabic, M., Potocan, V., Starkus, A., Danis, W., & Wallace, A. 2017. Communist footprint and subordinate influence behavior in post-communist transition economies. Journal of World Business, 52(2): 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banalieva, E. R., Puffer, S. M., McCarthy, D. J., & Vaiman, V. 2018. The impact of communist imprint prevalence on the risk-taking propensity of successful Russian entrepreneurs. European Journal of International Management, 12(1–2): 158–190.Google Scholar
Baransky, N. N. 1956. Economic geography of the U.S.S.R. Moscow: Foreign Language Publishing House.Google Scholar
Barnett, V. 2004. The revolutionary Russian economy, 1890–1940: Ideas, debates and alternatives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. N., & Hannan, M. T. 2002. Organizational blueprints for success in high-tech start-ups: Lessons from the Stanford project on emerging companies. California Management Review, 44(3): 8–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. N., Hannan, M. T., & Burton, M. D. 1999. Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations. American Sociological Review, 64(4): 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, J. S. 1983. Planning and management. In Bergson, A. & Levine, H. (Eds.), The Soviet economy: Toward the year 2000: 350–390. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bezrukov, L. A. 2014. Osobennosti territorial'noy khozyaystvenno-rasselencheskoy struktury i perspektivy prostranstvennogo razvitiya Sibiri. Internet-Zhurnal Naukovedenie, 6(25): 1–20.Google Scholar
Blažek, J., Květoň, V., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., & Trippl, M. 2019. The dark side of regional industrial path development: Toward a typology of trajectories of decline. European Planning Studies, 28(8): 1455–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeker, W. 1989. Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3): 489–515.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, M. J. 1991. The Soviet Union: A new regional geography? London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Brint, S. 2001. Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory, 19(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, R. F. 1976. Soviet-American academic exchanges, 1958–1975. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chasovsky, V. 2015. Key directions of sectoral and spatial changes in the Russian industry. Baltic Region, 3: 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliff, J. E., Langton, N., & Aldrich, H. E. 2005. Walking the talk? Gendered rhetoric vs. action in small firms. Organization Studies, 26(1): 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, R., Hanson, P., & Bradshaw, M. 2020. It's déjà vu all over again: COVID-19, the global energy market, and the Russian economy. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61(4–5): 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conquest, R. 1968. The great terror: Stalin's purge of the thirties. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Conyngham, W. J. 1982. The modernization of Soviet industrial management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coopersmith, J. 1992. The electrification of Russia 1880–1926. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crescenzi, R., & Jaax, A. 2017. Innovation in Russia: The territorial dimension. Economic Geography, 93(1): 66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, S. 2016. Monotowns and the political economy of industrial restructuring in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(5): 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. W. 1998. Soviet economic development from Lenin to Khrushchev. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis-Sramek, B., Fugate, B. S., Miller, J., Germain, R., Izyumov, A., & Krotov, K. 2017. Understanding the present by examining the past: Imprinting effects on supply chain outsourcing in a transition economy. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(1): 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellenbrant, J. Å. 1986. The Soviet regional dilemma: Planning, people, and natural resources. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
Demko, G. J. 1987. The Soviet settlement system–current issues and future prospects. Soviet Geography, 28(10): 707–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dezhina, I. 2011. Developing research in Russian universities. Russie. Nei. Visions, 57.Google Scholar
Dieleman, M. 2011. Shock-imprinting: External shocks and ethnic Chinese business groups in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3): 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W.W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 4(2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrev, S. D. 1999. The dynamics of the Bulgarian newspaper industry in a period of transition: Organizational adaptation, structural inertia and political change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(3): 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3): 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlich, A. 1960. The Soviet industrialization debate, 1924–1928. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. 2011. Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5): 935–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favero, G., Finotto, V., & Moretti, A. 2016. Historicizing entrepreneurial imprinting: Sensitive periods, cognitive frames and resistance. Working Paper 10, Department of Management, Università Ca'Foscari Venezia.Google Scholar
Ferriani, S., Garnsey, E., & Lorenzoni, G. 2012. Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: The process of reimprinting. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(4): 1011–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filatotchev, I., Wei, L. Q., Sarala, R. M., Dick, P., & Prescott, J. E. 2020. Connecting Eastern and Western perspectives on management: Translation of practices across organizations, institution and geographies. Journal of Management Studies, 57(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaponenko, N. 1995, Transformation of the research system in a transitional society: The case of Russia. Social Studies of Science, 25(4): 685–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geletkanycz, M. A. 1997. The salience of ‘culture's consequences’: The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8): 615–634.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gel'man, V. 2016. Authoritarian modernization in Russia: Ideas, institutions, and policies. Oxon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. J., Gill, D. J., & Roulet, T. J. 2018. Constructing trustworthy historical narratives: Criteria, principles and techniques. British Journal of Management, 29(1): 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of the Russian Federation. 2008. Concept for the long-term socioeconomic development of the Russian Federation until 2020. [Cited 31 March 2019]. Available from URL: http://www.ifap.ru/ofdocs/rus/rus006.pdfGoogle Scholar
Government of the Russian Federation. 2011. Strategy for innovative growth until 2020. [Cited 31 March 2019]. Available from URL: http://minsvyaz.ru/common/upload/2227-pril.pdfGoogle Scholar
Graham, L. R. 1967. The transformation of Russian science and the Academy of Sciences, 1927–1932. Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Graham, L. R. 1978. How valuable are scientific exchanges with the Soviet Union? Science, 202(4366): 383–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, L. R. 1990. Science and the Soviet social order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, L. R. 1992. Big science in the last years of the big Soviet Union. Osiris, 7: 49–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, L. R. 2001. The birth, withering, and rebirth of Russian history of science. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2: 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, L. R., & Dezhina, I. 2008. Science in the new Russia: Crisis, aid, reform. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Granick, D. 1959. An organizational model of Soviet industrial planning. Journal of Political Economy, 67(2): 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1022–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. 1962. The structure and organization of the Soviet economy. Slavic Review, 21(2): 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, M. 2010. Exploring the origin of organizational paths: Empirical evidence from new founded firms. Journal of Management, 36(5): 1143–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. R. 1999. The great Urals: Regionalism and the evolution of the Soviet system. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. C., & Ogbonna, E. 1999. The strategic legacy of company founders. Long Range Planning, 32(3): 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassink, R. 2010. Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. In Boschma, R. & Martin, R. (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography: 450–470. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Hassink, R. 2011. Regional resilience: A promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. 2019. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies. DOI:10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F., & Gaddy, C. G. 2003. The Siberian curse: How communist planners left Russia out in the cold. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Holtbrügge, D. 2013. Indigenous management research. Management International Review, 53(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzman, F. D. 1957. The Soviet Ural-Kuznetsk combine: A study in investment criteria and industrialization policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71(3): 368–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, D. 2016. Human capital and knowledge-intensive industries location: Evidence from Soviet legacy in Russia. The Journal of Economic History, 76(3): 736–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, V. 2007. What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1): 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, P. R. 1992. Soviet scientists and the state: Politics, ideology, and fundamental research from Stalin to Gorbachev. Social Research, 59(3): 589–614.Google Scholar
Josephson, P. R. 2005. Totalitarian science and technology. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G., & Martocchio, J. J. 2010. Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(3): 392–414.Google Scholar
Kaasa, A., Vadi, M., & Varblane, U. 2014. Regional cultural differences within European countries: Evidence from multi-country surveys. Management International Review, 54(6): 825–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalashnikov, T. M. 1969. Predslovie. In Kolosovskyi, N. N. (Ed.), Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: 3–12. Moscow, Russia: Izdatel'stvo Mysl’.Google Scholar
Kalberg, S. 1980. Max Weber's types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5): 1145–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalesnik, S. V. 1971. On the significance of Lenin's ideas for Soviet geography. Soviet Geography, 12(4): 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaska, G. J., & Linge, G. J. R. 1978. Applicability of the model of the territorial production complex outside the U.S.S.R. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 40(1): 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keng, C. K. 2001. China's future economic regionalization. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(29): 587–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khayrullina, M. 2014. Innovative territorial clusters as instruments of Russian regions development in global economy. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16: 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khrushchev, A. T. 1971. Industrial nodes of the USSR and principles for a typology. Soviet Geography, 12(2): 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kibita, N. 2013. Soviet economic management under Khrushchev: The Sovnarkhoz reform. UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinossian, N. 2013. Stuck in transition: Russian regional planning policy between spatial polarization and equalization. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 54(5–6): 611–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinossian, N. 2017a. State-led metropolisation in Russia. Urban Research & Practice, 10(4): 466–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinossian, N. 2017b. The cart before the horse: The perils of state-led metropolisation in Russia. Europa Regional, 23(4): 61–68.Google Scholar
Kinossian, N. 2018. Planning strategies and practices in non-core regions: A critical response. European Planning Studies, 26(2): 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinossian, N., & Morgan, K. 2014. Development by decree: The limits of ‘authoritarian modernization’ in the Russian Federation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5): 1678–1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipping, M., & Lamberg, J. A. 2017. History in process organization studies: What, why, and how. In Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies: 303–320. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kipping, M., & Üsdiken, B. 2014. History in organization and management theory: More than meets the eye. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 535–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klochikhin, E. A. 2012. Russia's innovation policy: Stubborn path-dependencies and new approaches. Research Policy, 41(9): 1620–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, J. 2011. Inscribed strategies: Exploring the organizational nature of strategic lock-in. Organization Studies, 32: 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 2000. Did socialism fail to innovate? A natural experiment of the two Zeiss companies. American Sociological Review, 65(2): 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolosov, V. A., Grechko, E. A., Mironenko, K. V., Samburova, E. N., Sluka, N. A., Tikunova, I. N., Tkachenko, T. Kh., Fedorchenko, A. V., Fomichev, P. Yu. 2016. Goryzonty issledovaniy v oblasti geografii mirovogo khozyaystvo (k 25-letiyu kafedry geografii mirovogo khozyaystvo). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta: Seriya 5: Geografiya, 1: 3–12.Google Scholar
Kolosovskiy, N. N. 1961. The territorial-production combination (complex) in Soviet economic geography. Journal of Regional Science, 3(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolosovskiy, N. N. 1969. Teorija Ékonomichsekogo Rajonirovanija. Moscow, Russia: Izdatel'stvo Mysl’.Google Scholar
Konstantinov, O. A. 1968. Economic geography in the USSR on the 50th anniversary of Soviet power. Soviet Geography, 9(5): 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korabeynikov, I. N., Ermakova, Zh. A., & Sinjukov, A. A. 2013. Upravlenie Nauchno-Tekhnicheskim Razvitiem Regional'nogo Promyshlennogo Kompleksa na Osnove Klastenogo Podkhoda. Regional'naja Ekonomika, 2: 47–61.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. 1992. The socialist system: The political economy of socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korobkov, A. V. & Zaionchkovskaia, Z. A. 2004. The changes in the migration patterns in the post-Soviet states: The first decade. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 37(4): 481–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korolev, V. I. 2013. Innovacionnye territorial'nye klastery: Zarubezhnyi opyt i rossiiskie uslovija. Mirovaja Ekonomika, 11: 20–27.Google Scholar
Korzh, A., & Lukyanchikova, N. P. 2013. Mirovoy opyt klasternogo razvitiya. Vestnik Irkutskogo Tehnicheskogo Universiteta, 11(82): 342–345.Google Scholar
Kosmachev, K. P., & Losyakova, K. M. 1976. Graph modeling of the evolution of structures of territorial-production complexes in new pioneering areas. Soviet Geography, 17(7): 468–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragh, M., & Hedlund, S. 2015. Researching Soviet archives: An introduction. The Russian Review, 74(3): 373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriauciunas, A., & Kale, P. 2006. The impact of socialist imprinting and search on resource change: A study of firms in Lithuania. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7): 659–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriauciunas, A., & Shinkle, G. 2008. Organizational imprinting: Informing firm behavior in domestic and international contexts. Purdue CIBER Working Papers, Paper 58.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. 1991. Geography and trade. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, S. V., & Mezhevik, H. M. 2017. Regional'naya ékonomicheskaya politika SSSR: Istoricheskiy opyt dlya novykh khozyaystvennykh uslovii. Ékononomicheskoe Vozhrozhdenie Rossii, 2(52): 97–113.Google Scholar
Lavrishchev, A. N. 1969. Economic geography of the U.S.S.R.. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Nord, W. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies: 215–254. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledeneva, A. V. 2006. How Russia really works: The informal practices that shaped post-Soviet politics and business. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. 1918. Draft plan of scientific and technical work. In Dalglish, R. (Ed.), Lenin's collected works, 4th English edition : 314–317. Moscow: Progress Publishers. [Cited 31 May 2019]. Available from URL: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1918/apr/x03.htmGoogle Scholar
Lenin, V. I. 1964. The development of capitalism in Russia. (1st published in 1899). Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Lin, A. A., & Ivanov, A. S. 2017. Konkurentnye preimuschestva innovacionnyh farmacevticheskikh klasterov (Na primere Sankt-Peterburgskogo farmacevticheskogo klastera). Seriya Medicina, Farmacija, 254(37): 149–157.Google Scholar
Linge, G. J. R., Karaska, G. J., & Ian Hamilton, F. E. 1978. An appraisal of the Soviet concept of the territorial production complex. Soviet Geography, 19(10): 681–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lis, A. G. 1975. On the question of the composition of economic territorial complexes. Soviet Geography, 16(1): 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, R. 1965. The Soviet concept of the territorial-production complex. Slavic Review, 24(3): 466–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maksimov, V., Wang, S. L., & Luo, Y. 2017. Institutional imprinting, entrepreneurial agency, and private firm innovation in transition economies. Journal of World Business, 52(6): 854–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marangos, J. 2002. The political economy of shock therapy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(1): 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markevich, A. 2005. Soviet planning archives: The files that Bergson could not see. Comparative Economic Studies, 47(2): 364–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markevich, A., & Mihailova, T. 2013. Economic geography of Russia. In Alexeev, M. & Weber, S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Russian economy: 617–643. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marquis, C. 2003. The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4): 655–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, C., & Battilana, J. 2009. Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29: 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, C., & Huang, Z. 2010. Acquisitions as exaptation: The legacy of founding institutions in the US commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1441–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, C., & Qiao, K. 2018. Waking from Mao's dream: Communist ideological imprinting and the internationalization of entrepreneurial ventures in China. Administrative Science Quarterly. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218792837Google Scholar
Marquis, C., & Tilcik, A. 2013. Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1): 193–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, C., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. 2011. Introduction: Community as an institutional order and a type of organizing. In Marquis, C., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. (Eds.), Communities and organizations: ix–xxvii. Bingley, UK: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4): 395–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, D. J., Puffer, S. M., Graham, L. R., & Satinsky, D. M. 2014. Emerging innovation in emerging economies: Can institutional reforms help Russia break through its historical barriers?. Thunderbird International Business Review, 56(3): 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, R. 1982. The Soviet Union and its geographical problems. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. 2012. Is national culture a meaningful concept? Cultural values delineate homogeneous national clusters of in-country regions. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(2): 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. 2014. Nations versus religions: Which has a stronger effect on societal values? Management International Review, 54(6): 801–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirskaya, E. Z. 1995. Russian academic science today: Its societal standing and the situation within the scientific community. Social Studies of Science, 25(4): 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moshkin, A. M. 1962. What is a territorial-production complex? Soviet Geography, 3(9): 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nechepurenko, I. 2018. In Russia, a top university lacks just one thing: Students. The New York Times. Available from URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/26/world/europe/european-university-st-petersburg-russia.htmlGoogle Scholar
Nikol'skyi, I. V. 1975. Economic regions, administrative regions and territorial-production complexes. Soviet Geography, 16(6): 374–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nove, A. 1986. The Soviet economic system. Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Nykänen, N. 2019. Competing institutional logics in Soviet industrial location policy. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 59(4): 314–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oertel, S., Thommes, K., & Walgenbach, P. 2016. Organizational failure in the aftermath of radical institutional change. Organization Studies, 37(8): 1067–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogbonna, E., & Harris, L. C. 2001. The founder's legacy: Hangover or inheritance?. British Journal of Management, 12(1): 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overchuk, T. P. 1982, Financial and legal aspects of the creation of an infrastructure in territorial-production complexes. Soviet Law & Government, 21(3): 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paasi, A. 1986. The institutionalization of regions: A theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia-International Journal of Geography, 164(1): 105–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. F., & Søndergaard, M. 2014. Countries, within-country regions, and multiple-country regions in international management: A functional, institutional, and critical event (FICE) perspective. Management International Review, 54(6): 781–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilipenko, I. 2005. Clusters and territorial-industrial complexes: Similar approaches or different concepts? First evidence from analysis of development of Russian regions. Paper prepared for the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association ‘Land Use and Water Management in a Sustainable Network Society’: 23–27 August 2005, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Plakoyiannaki, E., Wei, T., & Prashantam, S. 2019. Rethinking qualitative scholarship in emerging markets: Researching, theorizing, and reporting. Management and Organization Review, 15(2): 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokshishevskiy, V. V. 1966. Economic regionalization of the USSR (A review of research during 1962–64). Soviet Geography, 7(5): 4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokshishevskiy, V. V 1979. Soviet economic geography: Six decades of development and contemporary problems. Soviet Geography, 20(3): 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokshishevskiy, V. V., Mints, A. A., & Konstantinov, O. A. 1971. On new directions in the development of Soviet economic geography. Soviet Geography, 12(7): 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. 2014. Communist socialization and post-communist economic and political attitudes. Electoral Studies, 33: 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller, C. 1989. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4): 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6): 77–90.Google Scholar
Privalovskaya, G. A. 1979. General tendencies of development of territorial-production complexes. Soviet Geography, 20(2): 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probst, A. 1977. Territorial-production complexes. Soviet Geography, 18(3): 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. 2007. Can Russia's state-managed, network capitalism be competitive?: Institutional pull versus institutional push. Journal of World Business, 42(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. 2011. Two decades of Russian business and management research: An institutional theory perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2): 21–36.Google Scholar
Puffer, S. M., McCarthy, D. J., & Satinsky, D. M. 2018. Hammer and silicon: The Soviet diaspora in the US innovation economy-immigration, innovation, institutions, imprinting, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, Y., Roland, G., & Xu, C. 1999. Why is China different from Eastern Europe? Perspectives from organization theory. European Economic Review, 43(4–6): 1085–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, Y., & Xu, C. 1993. The M-form hierarchy and China's economic reform. European Economic Review, 37: 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabkin, Y. M. 1988. Science between the superpowers. New York: Priority Press.Google Scholar
Ransel, D. L. 2001. A single research community: Not yet. Slavic Review, 60(3): 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynard, M., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. 2013. Legacies of logics: Sources of community variation in CSR implementation in China. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39: 243–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, G., & Witt, M. A. 2015. Advancing indigenous management theory: Executive rationale as an institutional logic. Management and Organization Review, 11(2): 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekord, S. I. 2012. Vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya sovetskogo naslediya promyshlennyh vzaimodeystviy dlja razvitiya transgranichnyh promyshlenno-innovacionnyh klasterov na prostranstve SNG. Social'no-Ekonomicheskoe Razvitie Gosudarstv Evrazii: 321–325.Google Scholar
Rodgers, A. 1974. The locational dynamics of Soviet industry. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64(2): 226–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saushkin, Y. G. 1962. Economic geography in the USSR. Economic Geography, 38(1): 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saushkin, Y. G. 1966. A history of Soviet economic geography. Soviet Geography, 7(8): 3–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saushkin, Y. G., & Kalashnikova, T. M. 1960. Current problems in the economic regionalization of the USSR. Soviet Geography, 1(6): 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saushkin, Y. G., & Smirnov, A. M. 1971. The role of Lenin's ideas in the development of theoretical geography. Soviet Geography, 12(9): 559–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelyev, Y. V. 2013. Regional'naya ekonomicheskaya politika i strukturnye sdvigi v ekonomike rossiiskih regionov. Izvestiya Russkoe Geograficheskoe Obzhestva, 145(2): 9–24.Google Scholar
Schreyögg, G, & Sydow, J. 2011. Organizational path dependence: A process view. Organization Studies, 32(3): 321–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. 2013. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. 1949. TVA and the grassroots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, I. K., Razvadovskaya, Y. V., & Khanina, A. V. 2016. Klaster kak institut reindustrializacii territorial'no-otraslevyh kompleksov. Voprosy Regulirovaniya ekonomiki, 7(1): 75–83.Google Scholar
Shinkle, G. A., & Kriauciunas, A. P. 2012. The impact of current and founding institutions on strength of competitive aspirations in transition economies. Strategic Management Journal, 33(4): 448–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotskiy, V. P. 1976. The formation of territorial production complexes in the Angara-Yenisey region and the tasks of geographic research. Soviet Geography, 17(2): 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., & Heavey, C. 2015. ‘What's past is prologue’: A framework, review, and future directions for organizational research on imprinting. Journal of Management, 41(1): 288–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, P. N., Jaskiewicz, P., Gibb, J., & Combs, J. G. 2020. Managing history: How New Zealand's Gallagher Group used rhetorical narratives to reprioritize and modify imprinted strategic guideposts. Strategic Management Journal, 41(3): 557–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sochinskaya, A. V. 1977. Territorial-production complexes – an important approach to cost-effective economic location. Soviet Geography, 18(6): 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In March, J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organization: 142–193. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R, & Greenwood, R. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy.Administrative science quarterly, 50: 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suspitsyna, T. 2005. Adaptation of Western economics by Russian universities, intercultural travel of an academic field. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swords, J. 2013. Michael Porter's cluster theory as a local and regional development tool: The rise and fall of cluster policy in the UK. Local Economy, 28(4): 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4): 689–709.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. 1994. Socio-economic systems and organizational management: An institutional perspective on the socialist firm. Organization Studies, 15(1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tung, R. L. 2008. The cross-cultural research imperative: The need to balance cross-national and intra-national diversity. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1): 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udovenko, V. 1978. Changes in the location of productive forces of the USSR. Problems in Economics, 21(3): 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., & Lamberg, J-A. 2016. Taking historical embeddedness seriously: Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research. Academy of Management Review, 41(4): 633–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Tunzelmann, N., Malerba, F., Nightingale, P., & Metcalfe, S. 2008. Technological paradigms: Past, present and future. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(3): 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waeger, D., & Weber, K. 2019. Institutional complexity and organizational change: An open polity perspective. Academy of Management Review, 44(2): 336–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D., Du, F., & Marquis, C. 2019. Defending Mao's dream: How politicians’ ideological imprinting affects firms’ political appointment in China. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4): 1111–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2012. Ease of doing business index, subnational reports, Russia. [Cited 5 February 2020]. Available from URL: https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/reports/subnational-reports/russiaGoogle Scholar
Yegorov, I. 2009. Post-Soviet science: Difficulties in the transformation of the R&D systems in Russia and Ukraine. Research Policy, 38(4): 600–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaleski, E. 1980. Stalinist planning for economic growth, 1933–1952. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamyatina, N. Y., & Pelyasov, A. N. 2016. The Anna Karenina principle: How to diversify monocities. In Orttung, R. W. (Ed.), Sustaining Russia's arctic cities: Resource politics, migration and climate change: 42–66. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhirmunskiy, M. M. 1965. Economic regionalization in the People's Democracies. Soviet Geography, 6(1): 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyglidopoulos, S. 1999. Initial environmental conditions and technological change. Journal of Management Studies, 36(2): 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar