Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:31:31.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Economic-Social Duality for Executive Rationale: The Interplay between Resource Pool and Game Rule for Sense-Giving and Sense-Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Peter Ping Li
Peter Ping Li*
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business SchoolDenmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I truly enjoyed reading the perspective article entitled ‘Advancing indigenous management theory: Executive rationale as an institutional logic’ by Gordon Redding and Michael Witt (2015), especially its implications for a ‘promising avenue for indigenous management research’ (179). I agree with the authors in general terms that the research on the impact of culture as an informal institution, and also the effect of formal institutions, on business practices must come down from a highly abstract level to a more pragmatic ground, especially their interaction and integration as embodied by various specific mechanisms to guide practices. For that purpose, Redding and Witt introduce an interesting notion of ‘executive rationale’ to guide action. Applying the abstract notion of institutional logic to specific business practices, executive rationale refers to the ‘socially constructed, historical patterns of material practices, assumptions, values, beliefs, and rules by which individuals produce and reproduce their material subsistence, organize time and space, and provide meaning to their social reality’ (Thornton & Ocasio, 2008: 101) in the specific context of business practices. In other words, executive rationale provides a mental blueprint for practical actions in a business context. In addition, the authors have empirically generated a tentative model with multiple dimensions to compare the dominant executive rationales as institutionally-embedded across five key economies.

Keywords

Chinese managementcultureeconomic reformindigenous managementsocially enabling mechanism
Type
Commentaries
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 211 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. 1995. The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, T., & zu Knyphausen-Aufsess, D. 2014. On dominant logic: Review and synthesis. Journal of Business Economics, 84: 27–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda, Perspectives on Politics, 2: 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G. & Rau, S.B. 2015. Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 30 (1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 1998. Toward a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19: 829–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2005. The puzzle of China's township-village enterprises: The paradox of local corporatism in a dual-track economic transition. Management and Organization Review, 1 (2): 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4 (1): 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2012a. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 849–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2012b. Toward research-practice balancing in management: The Yin-Yang Method for open-ended and open-minded research. In Wang, C.L., Ketchen, D.J. & Bergh, D.D. (eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 8), Emerald, Chapter 4, 91–141.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2014a. The unique value of Yin-Yang Balancing: A critical response. Management and Organizational Review, 10 (3): 321–332.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2014b. A tentative typology of context for trust research and beyond. Journal of Trust Research, 4 (2): 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P., Leung, K., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J. D. 2012. Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organizational Review, 8 (1): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, G., & Witt, M. Advancing indigenous management theory: Executive rationale as an institutional logic. Management and Organization Review, 11 (2): 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, S. G. 1990. The spirit of capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P. H., & Occasio, W. 2008. Institutional logics. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin- Andersson, K. & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 99–129. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R. 2007. Business systems and organizational capabilities: The institutional structuring of competitive competences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar