Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:22:33.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Danger of Blindly Following: Examining the Relationship Between Authoritarian Leadership and Unethical Pro-organizational Behaviors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2021

Fangzhou Liu ,
Jian Liang  and
Mo Chen
Fangzhou Liu*
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Jian Liang*
Affiliation:
Tongji University, China
Mo Chen
Affiliation:
Harbin Institute of Technology, China
*
Corresponding authors: Fangzhou Liu ([email protected]) and Jian Liang ([email protected])
Corresponding authors: Fangzhou Liu ([email protected]) and Jian Liang ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Researchers have paid much attention to the performance implications of authoritarian leadership. However, less effort has been devoted to exploring its ethical consequences at work. Drawing on the social cognitive theory of morality, this study explores the indirect relationship between authoritarian leadership and subordinates’ unethical pro-organizational behaviors (UPB) via displacement of responsibility. A vignette-based experimental study (Study 1) and a time-lagged field study (Study 2) were conducted to test our hypotheses. Consistent findings were accumulated for the indirect relationship between authoritarian leadership and UPB through displacement of responsibility (both Study 1 and 2). Furthermore, this indirect relationship was stronger among employees with low level of moral efficacy (Study 2). We conclude this study by discussing the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

摘要

摘要

近年来，研究者对威权领导的绩效影响进行了大量的研究，但却很少关注到威权领导可能会产生的道德后果。基于道德的社会认知理论，本文探讨了威权领导与下属的亲组织不道德行为之间通过责任转移的间接关系，并通过一项情景实验研究（研究1）和一项两阶段的问卷调查（研究2）验证了本文的假设。研究结果显示，威权领导通过责任转移间接地影响了下属的亲组织不道德行为(研究1和2）。并且，这种间接关系在道德效能水平较低的员工中更强（研究2）。最后，本文讨论了这些发现更广的理论意义以及现实意义。

Аннотация

АННОТАЦИЯ

В научных исследованиях много внимания уделяется проблеме влияния авторитарного руководства на производительность. Однако, меньше усилий было потрачено на изучение влияния авторитарного руководства на рабочий процесс с точки зрения этики. На основании социально-когнитивной теории морали, данное исследование изучает косвенную взаимосвязь между авторитарным руководством и неэтичным про-организационным поведением подчиненных посредством смещения ответственности. Для проверки наших гипотез были проведены экспериментальное исследование с использованием метода виньеток (Работа 1) и полевое ретроспективное исследование (Работа 2). В результате исследований были сделаны последовательные выводы относительно непрямой взаимосвязи между авторитарным руководством и неэтичным про-организационным поведением подчиненных посредством смещения ответственности (Работы 1 и 2). Более того, эта косвенная взаимосвязь была сильнее среди сотрудников с низким уровнем моральной эффективности (Работа 2). В заключение, мы обсуждаем теоретическое и практическое значение результатов исследований.

Resumen

RESUMEN

Los investigadores han prestado mucha atención a las implicaciones en el desempeño del liderazgo autoritario. Sin embargo, se ha dedicado menos esfuerzo a explorar sus consecuencias en el trabajo. Basándose en la teoría social cognitiva de la moralidad, este estudio explora la relación indirecta entre liderazgo autoritario y los comportamientos poco éticos a favor de la empresa (UPB por sus siglas en inglés) mediante el desplazamiento de la responsabilidad. Se llevo a cabo un estudio experimental basado en viñetas (estudio 1) y un estudio de campo con desfase temporal (estudio 2) para probar nuestras hipótesis. Se acumularon hallazgos consistentes para la relación indirecta entre el liderazgo autoritario y los comportamientos poco éticos a favor de la empresa mediante el desplazamiento de la responsabilidad (tanto en el estudio 1 como el 2). Además, esta relación indirecta fue más fuerte entre empleados con niveles menores de eficacia moral (estudio 2). Concluimos este estudio discutiendo las implicaciones teóricas y prácticas de estos hallazgos.

Keywords

authoritarian leadershipdisplacement of responsibilitymoral efficacyunethical pro-organizational behaviors威权领导责任转移亲组织不道德行为道德效能感авторитарное руководствосмещение ответственностиморальная эффективностьнеэтичное про-организационное поведениеliderazgo autoritariodesplazamiento de responsabilidadeficacia morallos comportamientos poco éticos a favor de la empres
Type
Article
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 524 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

ACCEPTED BY Deputy Editor Xu Huang

References

REFERENCES

Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. 2004. Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(2): 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. 2016. Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. 1996. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2): 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsky, A. 2011. Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1): 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, D. S., & Buckley, M. R. 2004. This is war: How the politically astute achieve crimes of obedience through the use of moral disengagement. Leadership Quarterly, 15(4): 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In Triandis, H. C. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: 349–444. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Butterfield, K. D., Trevin, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. 2000. Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7): 981–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, S. C. 2014. Paternalistic leadership and employee voice: Does information sharing matter? Human Relations, 67(6): 667–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, S. C., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. K. 2013. The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization-based self-esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1): 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M., Chen, C. C., & Sheldon, O. J. 2016. Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8): 1082–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, T., Li, F., & Leung, K. 2017. Whipping into shape: Construct definition, measurement, and validation of directive-achieving leadership in Chinese culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3): 537–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. 2014. Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3): 796–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Zhu, J., & Zhou, M. 2015. How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2): 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. 2000. A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14(1): 3–64.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Huang, M., Farh, L. J., & Peng, S. 2003. A triad model of paternalistic leadership: Evidence from business organizations in Mainland China. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 20(1): 209–250.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. 2004. Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1): 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Chou, L. F. 2002. Paternalistic leadership and its effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese organizational teams. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 3(1): 85–112.Google Scholar
Chou, W. J., Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., & Jen, C. K. 2010. Juan-chiuan and shang-yan: The components of authoritarian leadership. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 34: 223–284.Google Scholar
Dang, C. T., Umphress, E. E., & Mitchell, M. S. 2017. Leader social accounts of subordinates’ unethical behavior: Examining observer reactions to leader social accounts with moral disengagement language. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(10): 1448–1461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Hoogh, A. H., & Den Hartog, D. N. 2009. Neuroticism and locus of control as moderators of the relationships of charismatic and autocratic leadership with burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4): 1058–1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. 2008. Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2): 374–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. 2000. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Li, J. T., Tsui, A. S., & Weldon, E. (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context: 84–127. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, R., Welsh, D., Yam, K. C., Baer, M., Wei, W., & Vaulont, M. 2019. The role of moral decoupling in the causes and consequences of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 153(1): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Paciello, M., Ghezzi, V., & Barbaranelli, C. 2016. Understanding the interplay among regulatory self-efficacy, moral disengagement, and academic cheating behaviour during vocational education: A three-wave study. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3): 1–16.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T. D., Major, D. A., & Davis, D. D. 2008. The interactive relationship of competitive climate and trait competitiveness with workplace attitudes, stress, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(7): 899–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrenya, W. K., & Hwang, K. K. 1996. Chinese social interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Chinese psychology: 309–321. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., & Galinsky, A. D. 2011. A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1): 32–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, G. G. 1990. Patriarchy, patrimonialism, and filial piety: A comparison of China and Western Europe, British Journal of Sociology, 41(1): 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, S. T., & Avolio, B. J. 2010. Moral potency: Building the capacity for character-based leadership. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4): 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. 2011. Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4): 663–685.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. 2012. My macros and code for SPSS and SAS. Available from URL: http://www.afhayes.com/spss-sas-andmplus-macros-and-code.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hiller, N. J., Sin, H. P., Ponnapalli, A. R., & Ozgen, S. 2019. Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1): 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, K. T., Wang, L., Hinrichs, A. T., & Romero, E. J. 2012. Moral disengagement through displacement of responsibility: The role of leadership beliefs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(1): 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. S. S., Greenbaum, R. L., Bonner, J. M., & Wang, C. S. 2019. Why sabotage customers who mistreat you? Activated hostility and subsequent devaluation of targets as a moral disengagement mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(4): 495–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, G. H., Wellman, N., Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Wang, L. 2017. Deviance and exit: The organizational costs of job insecurity and moral disengagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(1): 26–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, X., Xu, E., Chiu, W., Lam, C., & Farh, J. L. 2015. When authoritarian leaders outperform transformational leaders: Firm performance in a harsh economic environment. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1(2): 180–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H., Chen, Y., Sun, P., & Yang, J. 2017. The relationship between authoritarian leadership and employees’ deviant workplace behaviors: The mediating effects of psychological contract violation and organizational cynicism. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilduff, G. J., Galinsky, A. D., Gallo, E., & Reade, J. J. 2016. Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5): 1508–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J., Treviño, L. K., Baker, V., & Martin, S. 2014. Situational moral disengagement: Can the effects of self-interest be mitigated?. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2): 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. 2010. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D., Choi, Y., Youn, S., & Chun, J. U. 2017. Ethical leadership and employee moral voice: The mediating role of moral efficacy and the moderating role of leader–follower value congruence. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1): 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A., & Legood, A. 2017. Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Leung, K., Chen, Z., Zhou, F., & Lim, K. 2014. The role of relational orientation as measured by face and renqing in innovative behavior in China: An indigenous analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1): 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, D. R., Luth, M. T., & Schwoerer, C. E. 2014. The influence of business ethics education on moral efficacy, moral meaningfulness, and moral courage: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1): 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFerran, B., Aquino, K., & Duffy, M. 2010. How personality and moral identity relate to individuals’ ethical ideology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1): 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. 2012. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3): 437–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. 2015. Moral disengagement. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., & Gino, F. 2015. Approach, ability, aftermath: A psychological process framework of unethical behavior at work. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1): 235–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. 2012. Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1): 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., Mayer, D. M., Chiang, F. F., Crossley, C., Karlesky, M. J., & Birtch, T. A. 2019. Leaders matter morally: The role of ethical leadership in shaping employee moral cognition and misconduct. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1): 123–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. 2012. Mplus user's guide: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén&Muthén.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. K., Poms, L. W., & Wolf, P. P. 2012. Developing efficacy beliefs for ethics and diversity management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1): 49–68.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. 2008. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3): 566–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. 2006. Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4): 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. 2012. Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2): 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronay, R., Greenaway, K., Anicich, E. M., & Galinsky, A. D. 2012. The path to glory is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psychological Science, 23(6): 669–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaubroeck, J. M., Shen, Y., & Chong, S. 2017. A dual-stage moderated mediation model linking authoritarian leadership to follower outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2): 203–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Baron, R. A. 2013. ‘I care about nature, but…’: Disengaging values in assessing opportunities that cause harm. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5): 1251–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, R., Wang, A. C., & Farh, J. L. 2020. Asian conceptualizations of leadership: Progresses and challenges. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7: 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborg, J. R. 1981. Interactional psychology and research on human behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 6(4): 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tost, L. P., Gino, F., & Larrick, R. P. 2013. When power makes others speechless: The negative impact of leader power on team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5): 1465–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevino, L. K. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3): 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. 2011. When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3): 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. 2010. Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4): 769–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, A. C., Tsai, C. Y., Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Spain, S. M., Ling, H. C., Huang, M-P., Chou, L-F., & Cheng, B. S. 2018. Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(6): 686–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, D. T., & Ordóñez, L. D. 2014. Conscience without cognition: The effects of subconscious priming on ethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3): 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, R. 1997. Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18(3): 445–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. 1998. Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, M., Huang, X., Li, C., & Liu, W. 2012. Perceived interactional justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yammarino, F. J., Salas, E., Serban, A., Shirreffs, K., & Shuffler, M. L. 2012. Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the ‘we’ in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4): 382–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Xie, Y. H. 2017. Authoritarian leadership and extra-role behaviors: A role-perception perspective. Management and Organization Review, 13(1): 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Y., Huang, X., Graham, L., Redman, T., & Hu, S. 2020. Deterrence effects: The role of authoritarian leadership in controlling employee workplace deviance. Management and Organization Review, 16(2): 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. 2005. Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(4): 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar