Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:08:40.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Corporatist System and Social Organizations in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Kazuko Kojima ,
Jae-Young Choe ,
Takafumi Ohtomo  and
Yutaka Tsujinaka
Kazuko Kojima
Affiliation:
Keio University, Japan
Jae-Young Choe
Affiliation:
University of Tsukuba, Japan
Takafumi Ohtomo
Affiliation:
University of Tsukuba, Japan
Yutaka Tsujinaka
Affiliation:
University of Tsukuba, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers whether social organizations (SOs) in China have acquired more autonomy over time under the socialist market economy. To discern whether SOs are changing under the corporatist system, we use quantitative data analyses of a 2001 to 2004 survey of SOs in China. We find that the later the SOs were founded, the more autonomy they have and die more oriented they are to representing their constituents' interests. The data also verify that the later SOs were formed, the greater their desire for freedom from the party-state. Furthermore, SOs that are more autonomous tend to be more critical of the SO management system, but this holds only for SOs founded before 2000. After 2001, no correlation occurs between autonomy and the expressed desire for more freedom.

Keywords

autonomyChinacorporatismsocial organizations自立性中国法团主义社会组织
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 8 , Issue 3: Special Issue Innovations in Public and Non-profit Sector Organizations in China , November 2012 , pp. 609 - 628
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chan, A. 1993. Revolution or corporatism? Workers and trade unions in Post-Mao China. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 29: 31–61.Google Scholar
Dickson, B. 2001. Cooptation and corporatism in China: The logic of party adaptation. Political Science Quarterly, 115(4): 517–540.Google Scholar
Holbig, H. 2006. Fragmented corporatism: Interest politics in China's private business sector. Paper for the ECPR Joint Sessions, Workshop 25 ‘Interest Politics in Post-Communist Democracies’, Nicosia.Google Scholar
Jia, X., Shen, H., & Hu, W. 2004. Trade associations at transition stage: Roles, functions, and regulatory system. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Kennedy, S. 2008. The price of competition: The failed government eflbrt to use associations to organize China's market economy. In Unger, J. (Ed.), Associations and the Chinese state: Contested spaces: 149–174. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Ma, Q. 2006. Non-governmental organizations in contemporary China: Paving the way to civil society?. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ministry of Civil Aflairs of the People's Republic of China (Ed.), 2010. China civil affairs, statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Pearson, M. 1994, The janus face of business associations in China: Socialist corporatism in foreign enterprises. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 31: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saich, T. 1994. The search for civil society and democracy in China. Current History, 93(584); 260–264.Google Scholar
Saich, T. 2000. Negotiating the state: The development of social organizations in China. The China Quarterly, 161: 124–141.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. 1974. Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1): 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, J., & Chan, A. 2008. Associations in a bind: The emergence of political corporatism. In J, Unger (Ed.), Associations and the Chinese state: Contested spaces: 48–68. Armonk, NY: M E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Wang, M. 2000. Study on Chinese NGOs: Based on case studies. Beijing: Tsinghna University NGO Research Center and UN Regional Development Center (in Chinese).Google Scholar
White, G., Howell, J., & Shang, X. 1996. In search of civil society: Market reform and social change in contemporary China. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar