Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:56:33.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Addressing Reviewer Comments as an Integrative Negotiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2015

Leigh Anne Liu
Leigh Anne Liu*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorials on Reviewing
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , July 2014 , pp. 183 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2014

References

Ashford, S. J. 1996. The publishing process: The struggle for meaning. In Frost, P. J. & Taylor, M. S. (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia: 119–127. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X.-P. 2011. Author ethical dilemmas in the research publication process. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. 2008. Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organization Science, 19(1): 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. 2004. The influence of power on the information search, impression formation and demands in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40: 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. 2011. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (3rd ed.). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hempel, P. S. 2014. The developmental reviewer. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 175–181.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. 2010. Negotiation (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Murnighan, J. K. 1986. Organizational coalitions: Structural contingencies and the formation processes. In Lewicki, N. R. J., Sheppard, B. H. & Bazerman, M. H. (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations, vol. 1: 155–173. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Murnighan, J. K. 1996. Revising and resubmitting: Author emotions, editor roles, and the value of dialogue. In Frost, P. J. & Taylor, M. S. (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia: 135–142. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. 1982. The role of communication in bargaining. Human Communication Research, 8: 262–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rindova, V. 2008. Editor’s comments: Publishing theory when you are new to the game. Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 300–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. D. 2012. From the Editors: Responding to reviewers. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6): 1261–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, T., & Tripp, T. 1997. The negotiation checklist: How to win the battle before it begins. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 38(1): 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L. 2012. The mind and heart of the negotiator (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Tsang, E. W. K. 2014. Ensuring manuscript quality and preserving authorial voice: A balancing act of editors. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 191–197.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 2009. Successful authors and effective reviewers: Balancing supply and demand in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2): 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ury, W., Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. 1988. Getting disputes resolved: Designing systems to cut the costs of conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar