Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:16:47.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Process Model of Dynamic Capability Development: Evidence from the Chinese Manufacturing Sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Jing Zeng ,
Colin Simpson  and
Binh-Le Dang
Jing Zeng*
Affiliation:
University of Kent, UK
Colin Simpson
Affiliation:
University of Gloucestershire, UK
Binh-Le Dang
Affiliation:
Ashcroft Technology Academy, UK
*
Corresponding author: Jing Zeng ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on longitudinal case studies of manufacturing strategy and implementation at two Chinese manufacturing firms, this paper investigates how these firms develop, manage, and deploy dynamic capabilities to renew their resource bases in order to respond to the operational challenges associated with radical technological development. Our analysis suggests that dynamic capability development is not simply about renewing one specific type of capability, but rather, it is a meta-capability to learn how to repeatedly renew the firm's overall capability set as a fully integrated package. We further highlight the importance of looking beyond the property of the firm to understand the network level of capability development, including the capabilities of the firm's partners. This is particularly salient in the context of smart manufacturing where a high level of connectivity among a broader network of partners is required to reap the benefits generated by new technological advances. Our findings provide an important contribution to our knowledge of dynamic capability development in emerging economies in the era of digitalized manufacturing.

摘要:

摘要:

基于对两家中国制造型企业的制造战略及实施的纵向案例研究, 本文探讨这些企业如何开发、管理和部署动态能力来更新它们的资源基础, 以应对与重大技术发展相关的业务挑战。我们的分析表明, 动态能力开发并非仅仅是更新一个特定类型的能力, 而是设定为全集成包的如何反复更新企业整体能力的一种元能力。我们进而强调超越企业特性的重要性, 以理解能力开发的网络水平, 包括该公司合作伙伴的能力。这在智能制造的情境下尤为突出, 那里需要合作伙伴更广网络之间高水平的连接, 以收获由新技术进步产生的效益。我们的研究结果对我们的数字化制造时代新兴经济体动态能力开发的知识做出了重要贡献。

चीनी विनिर्माण क्षेत्र की दो फर्मों के दीर्घकालीन वृत्त अध्ययनों के आधार पर यह शोध यह अनुसंधान करता है की किस प्रकार यह फर्म अमूल तकनीकी विकास जनित परिचालन सम्बन्धी चुनौतियों का सामना करने हेतु अपने संसाधन आधार का नवीकरण कारण के लिए गतिशील सामर्थ्य का विकास, प्रबंधन व प्रयोग करती हैं. हमारा शोध यह दिखता है की गतिशील सामर्थ्य निर्माण मात्र नीयत क्षमता का नवीनीकरण नहीं है, वरन यह संगठनीय सामर्थ्य के नित्य एवं एकीकृत विकास को सुलभ करने वाली व्यापक क्षमता है. इसी के साथ हम फर्म की संपत्ति से परे उसके संजालों से जनित सामर्थ्य को समझने का (जिसमें सहभागी इकाइयों का सामर्थ्य भी शामिल है) महत्व दर्शाते हैं. यह स्मार्ट विनिर्माण के सन्दर्भ में-जहाँ नवीन तकनीकी विकास का लाभ लेने के लिए सभी सामान्य संजालों के प्रतिभागियों में संयोजन आवश्यक है-महत्वपूर्ण है. हमारे शोध परिणाम अंकीय विनिर्माण युग में उदीयमान अर्थव्यवस्थाओं में गतिशील सामर्थ्य के विकास को समझने में महत्त्वपूर्ण योगदान करते हैं.

Sumário:

Sumário:

Com base em estudos de caso longitudinais de estratégia e implementação de manufatura em duas empresas de manufatura chinesas, este trabalho investiga como essas empresas se desenvolvem, gerenciam e implantam capacidades dinâmicas para renovar suas bases de recursos para responder aos desafios operacionais associados ao desenvolvimento tecnológico radical. Nossa análise sugere que o desenvolvimento da capacidade dinâmica não é simplesmente sobre a renovação de um tipo específico de capacidade, mas é uma meta-capacidade para aprender a renovar repetidamente o conjunto de capacidades da empresa como um pacote totalmente integrado. Destacamos ainda mais a importância de olhar para além da propriedade da empresa para entender o nível de rede do desenvolvimento de capacidades, incluindo as capacidades dos parceiros da empresa. Isto é particularmente saliente no contexto da fabricação inteligente, onde é necessário um alto nível de conectividade entre uma rede mais ampla de parceiros para apropriar os benefícios gerados pelos novos avanços tecnológicos. Nossas descobertas fornecem uma importante contribuição para o nosso conhecimento sobre o desenvolvimento de capacidades dinâmicas nas economias emergentes na era da fabricação digitalizada.

Аннотация:

АННОТАЦИЯ:

На основании продолжительного исследования производственной стратегии и ее реализации в двух китайских промышленных компаниях, данная работа посвящена тому, как эти компании развивают, управляют и применяют свои динамические способности для обновления ресурсных баз с той целью, чтобы реагировать на оперативные проблемы, которые возникают в связи с радикальными технологическими изменениями. Наш анализ показывает, что развитие динамических способностей связано не только с обновлением одного конкретного типа способностей, но это, скорее, мета-способность, которая заключается в умении многократно обновлять совокупные способности компании, которые существуют как единое интегрированное целое. Более того, мы особо подчеркиваем важность выхода за пределы собственной компании, чтобы понять сетевой уровень развития способностей, в том числе способности партнеров фирмы. Это имеет особое значение в контексте умного производства, где требуется высокий уровень взаимодействия в пределах более широкой сети партнеров, чтобы воспользоваться преимуществами новых технологических достижений. Наши выводы делают важный вклад в теоретические знания о развитии динамических способностей в развивающихся странах в эпоху цифрового производства.

Resumen:

RESUMEN:

Con base en estudios de caso longitudinal de estrategia manufacturera e implementación en dos empresas chinas manufactureras, este artículo investiga cómo estas empresas desarrollan, administran y despliegan capacidades dinámicas para renovar sus bases de recursos para responder a los retos operacionales asociados con desarrollo tecnológico radical. Nuestro análisis sugiere que el desarrollo de las capacidades dinámicas no es simplemente renovar un tipo específico de capacidad, sino que es una meta-capacidad para aprender como repetidamente renovar la capacidad general de la empresa como un paquete integrado. Destacamos además la importancia de buscar más allá de la propiedad de la empresa para entender el nivel de red de desarrollo de capacidades, incluyendo las capacidades de los socios de empresa. Esto es principalmente importante en el contexto de manufactura inteligente donde un alto nivel de conectividad entre una red más amplia de socios es necesario para recoger beneficios generados de los nuevos avances tecnológicos. Nuestros hallazgos proporcionan una importante contribución a nuestro conocimiento de las capacidades dinámicas en las economías emergentes en la era de manufactura digitalizada.

Keywords

Chinadigital manufacturingdynamic capability developmentemerging economies中国数字化制造动态能力开发新兴经济体चीनअंकीकृत विनिर्माणगतिशील सामर्थ्य विकासउदीयमान अर्थव्यवस्थाएंChinamanufatura digitaldesenvolvimento de capacidade dinâmicaeconomias emergentesКитайцифровое производстворазвитие динамических способностейразвивающиеся экономикиChinamanufactura digitaldesarrollo de capacidades dinámicaseconomías emergentes
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 643 - 673
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aggarwal, R., & Weekly, J. K. 1982. Foreign operations of third world multinationals: A literature review and analysis of Indian companies. The Journal of Developing Areas, 17 (1): 13–30.Google Scholar
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. 2009. What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11 (1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athreye, S., Kale, D., & Ramani, S. V. 2009. Experimentation with strategy and the evolution of dynamic capability in the Indian pharmaceutical sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18 (4): 729–759.Google Scholar
Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. 2007. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omission. Management International Review, 47 (2): 175–192.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99–120.Google Scholar
Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. 1995. The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (1): 5–14.Google Scholar
Bland, B. 2015. China manufacturing: Adapt or die. Financial Times . [Cited 17 June 2016.] Available from URL: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/95152528-789e-11e5-933d-efcdc3c11c89.html#axzz4A9KHfJ3o Google Scholar
Block, Z., & MacMillan, I. C. 1985. Milestones for successful venture planning. Harvard Business Review, 63 (5): 184–196.Google Scholar
Brandenburger, A. M., & Stuart, H. W. 1996. Value based strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 5 (1): 5–24.Google Scholar
Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cepeda-Carrion, G., Navarro, J. G. C., & Martinez-Caro, E. 2012. Improving the absorptive capacity through unlearning context: An empirical investigation in hospital-in-the-home units. Service Industries Journal, 32 (9): 1551–1570.Google Scholar
Collis, D. J. 1994. Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Winter Special Issue): 143–152.Google Scholar
D'Aveni, R. 1994. Hypercompetition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Day, G. S. 1994. The Capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Change Management, 10 (3): 275–292.Google Scholar
Dixon, S. E. A., & Day, M. 2010. The rise and fall of Yukos: A case study of success and failure in an unstable institutional environment. Journal of Change Management, 10 (3): 275–292.Google Scholar
Dixon, S. E. A., Meyer, K., E., & Day, M. 2014. Building dynamic capabilities of adaptation and innovation: A Study of micro-foundations. Long Range Planning, 47 (4): 186–205.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989a. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532–550.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989b. Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32 (3): 543–576.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 25–32.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10–11): 1105–1121.Google Scholar
Ethiraj, S. K., Kale, P., Jrishnan, M. S., & Singh, J. V. 2005. Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software service industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (1): 25–45.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10): 997–1010.Google Scholar
Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. 2000. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in drug discovery. In Dosi, G., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities: 155–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, G. P., & Power, D. J. 1985. Retrospective reports of strategic level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6 (2): 171–180.Google Scholar
Hwang, K. K. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92 (4): 944–974.Google Scholar
Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4): 602–611.Google Scholar
Kale, D. 2010. The distinctive patterns of dynamic learning and inter-firm differences in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. British Journal of Management, 21 (1): 223–238.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 1997. Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kriauciunas, A., & Kale, P. 2006. The impact of socialist imprinting and search of resource change: A study of firms in Lithuania. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (7): 659–679.Google Scholar
Laamanen, T., & Wallin, J. 2009. Cognitive dynamics of capability development paths. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (6): 950–981.Google Scholar
Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4): 691–710.Google Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. 1990. A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1 (3): 248–265.Google Scholar
Lewin, A. 2014. Emerging economies open unlimited opportunities for advancing management and organization scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 10 (1): 1–5.Google Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. 2011. Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organization Science, 22 (1): 81–98.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 1994. Strategy profiles of indigenous MNEs from the NIEs: The case of South Korea and Taiwan. The International Executives, 36 (2): 147–170.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2010. Toward a learning-based view of internationalization: The accelerated trajectories of cross-border learning for latecomers. Journal of International Management, 16 (1): 43–59.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. 1988. First mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9 (S1): 41–58.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Locke, K. 2001. Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Magnier, M. 2016. China manufacturing gauge weakens further as economy loses steam. The Wall Street Journal . [Cited 16 June 2016]. Available from URL: http://www.wsj.com/articles/china-manufacturing-gauge-weakens-further-as-economy-loses-steam-1462248735 Google Scholar
Maitlis, S. 2005. The social processes of organizational sense making. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (1): 21–49.Google Scholar
Malik, O. M., & Kotabe, M. 2009. Dynamic capabilities, government policies, and performance in firms from emerging economies: Evidence from India and Pakistan. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (3): 421–450.Google Scholar
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. H. 2011. Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Lexington, KY: McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
Mathews, J., & Cho, D. S. 2000. Tiger technology: The creation of a semiconductor industry in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. E. 2015. Context in management research in emerging economies. Management and Organization Review, 11 (3): 369–377.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (6): 600–621.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nielsen, R. A. 2016. Case selection via matching. Social Methods & Research, 45 (3): 569–597.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special Issue): 187–206.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 486–501.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Peteraf, M., & Barney, J. 2003. Unravelling the resource based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24 (4): 309–323.Google Scholar
Pitelis, C. N., & Teece, D. J. 2010. Cross-border market co-creation, dynamic capabilities and the entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19 (4): 1247–1270.Google Scholar
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26 (1): 22–40.Google Scholar
Roach, S. 2003. China's global stature. MorganStanley Global Economic Forum, May 21, 2003. New York: MorganStanley.Google Scholar
Siggelkow, N. 2002. Evolution toward fit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (1): 125–159.Google Scholar
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. 2010. The strategy of paired comparison: Toward a theory of practice. Comparative Political Studies, 43 (2): 230–259.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13): 1319–1350.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 2012. Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (8): 1395–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7): 509–533.Google Scholar
Tsang, E. W. K. 1998. Inside story: Mind your identity when conducting cross national research. Organization Studies, 19 (3): 511–515.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2007. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 1353–1364.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Tybout, J. 2000. Manufacturing firms in developing countries: How well do they do, and why? Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (1): 11–44.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1993. The collapse of sense making in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (4): 628–652.Google Scholar
Wells, L. 1983. Third world multinationals: The rise of foreign investment from developing countries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2): 171–180.Google Scholar
West III, G., & DeCastro, J. 2001. The Achilles heel of firm strategy: Resource weaknesses and distinctive inadequacies. Journal of Management Studies, 38 (3): 417–442.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5 (1): 29–55.Google Scholar
Williamson, P. J. 2016. Building and leveraging dynamic capabilities: Insights from accelerated innovation in China. Global Strategy Journal, 6 (3): 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. G. 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10): 991–995.Google Scholar
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zeng, J., & Glaister, K. 2016. Competitive dynamics between MNE and local internet platform companies (IPCs) in the virtual market in China. British Journal of Management, 27 (3): 479–496.Google Scholar
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13 (3): 339–351.Google Scholar
Zollo, M., Bettinazzi, E. L. M., Neumann, K., & Snoeren, P. 2016. Toward a comprehensive model of organizational evolution: Dynamic capabilities for innovation and adaptation of the enterprise model. Global Strategy Journal, 6 (3): 225–244.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Zeng et al supplementary material

Zeng et al supplementary material 1

Download Zeng et al supplementary material(File)
File 14.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zeng et al supplementary material

Zeng et al supplementary material 2

Download Zeng et al supplementary material(File)
File 14.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zeng et al supplementary material

Zeng et al supplementary material 3

Download Zeng et al supplementary material(File)
File 24.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zeng et al supplementary material

Zeng et al supplementary material 4

Download Zeng et al supplementary material(File)
File 14.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zeng et al supplementary material

Zeng et al supplementary material 5

Download Zeng et al supplementary material(File)
File 13.2 KB