Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:59:45.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring Firm-Level Antecedents that Drive Motives of Internationalization: A Study of Knowledge Intensive Indian Firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2020

Faisal M. Ahsan ,
Ashutosh Sinha  and
R Srinivasan
Faisal M. Ahsan*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, India
Ashutosh Sinha
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, India
R Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, India
*
Corresponding author: Faisal M. Ahsan ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study firm level antecedents that drive different motives of internationalization of emerging economy firms. Based on firm's resource based considerations of asset exploitation versus asset augmentation and locational advantages of host countries, we provide a framework to classify the motives of internationalization of emerging economy firms belonging to knowledge intensive industries. Motives of internationalization have been classified into three broad categories – market-seeking, opportunity-seeking, and strategic asset-seeking. We determine motives behind different modes of internationalization – alliances, acquisitions, and greenfield ventures. Drawing upon the adaptability, amalgamation, and ambidexterity (AAA) advantages from the springboard perspective, we find that firm characteristics like R&D investments, availability of financial slack, firm's ownership structure, and family control shape up its motive of internationalization.

摘要

摘要

我们探讨了影响新型经济体企业不同国际化动机的企业因素。基于对企业资产利用与资产增值的资源考量并考虑到东道国的区位优势，我们提出一个框架对新型经济体中知识密集型企业的国际化动机进行分类。国际化动机分类三个大的类别：市场搜寻，机会搜寻和战略资产搜寻。我们确定了诸如联盟、收购和绿地投资这几类国际化模式背后的不同动机。基于跳板理论中的适应性、融合性和双元性 (AAA)优势，我们发现公司的研发投入、财务宽裕、所有制结构和家庭控制等特征会影响公司的国际化动机。

Аннотация

АННОТАЦИЯ

Мы исследуем предпосылки на уровне компаний, которые движут различными мотивами для интернационализации компаний в странах с развивающейся экономикой. На основе соображений по использованию ресурсов в компании, т.е. эксплуатации активов в сравнении с приумножением активов, а также географическим преимуществам в принимающих странах, мы предлагаем классификацию мотивов для интернационализации наукоемких компаний в странах с развивающейся экономикой. Мотивы для интернационализации были разделены на три широкие категории – освоение рынков сбыта, поиск возможностей и поиск стратегических активов. Мы определяем мотивы для различных способов интернационализации – союзов, приобретений и новых проектов. Опираясь на преимущества адаптивности, амальгамации и амбидекстрии (ААА) с точки зрения теории трамплина, мы обнаруживаем, что такие характерные черты компании, как инвестиции в НИОКР, наличие финансового спада, структура собственности фирмы и контроль со стороны семьи владельцев, формируют мотивы для интернационализации.

Resumen

RESUMEN

Estudiamos los antecedentes a nivel de la empresa que impulsan los diferentes motivos de la internacionalización de empresas de economías emergentes. Basándonos en las consideraciones basadas en recursos empresariales de la explotación de activos frente al aumento de activos y las ventajas de ubicación en los países anfitriones, proporcionamos un marco para clasificar los motivos de la internacionalización de empresas de una economía emergente perteneciente a industrias intensivas en conocimiento. Los motivos de la internacionalización han sido clasificados en tres grandes categorías: búsqueda de mercados, búsqueda de oportunidades, y búsqueda de activos. Determinamos los motivos detrás de los diferentes modos de internacionalización: alianzas, adquisiciones y nuevas empresas. Recurriendo a las ventajas de adaptabilidad, amalgama y ambidexteridad (AAA) de la perspectiva del trampolín, encontramos características de la empresa como las inversiones en I + D, la disponibilidad de holgura financiera, la estructura de propiedad de la empresa y el control familiar configuran el motivo de la empresa para internacionalizarse.

Keywords

emerging economiesinternationalizationlocation advantagesmarket-seekingopportunity-seekingspring board perspectivesstrategic asset-seekingstrategic motives新兴经济国际化，区位优势市场搜寻跳板理论机会搜寻战略资产搜寻战略动机развивающиеся экономикиинтернационализациягеографические преимуществаосвоение рынкатеория трамплинапоиск возможностейпоиск стратегических активовстратегические мотивыeconomías emergentesinternacionalizaciónventajas de ubicaciónbúsqueda de mercadoperspectivas de trampolínbúsqueda de oportunidadbúsqueda de activosmotivos estratégicos
Type
Article
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2020 , pp. 867 - 906
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Accepted by: Senior Editor Lin Cui

References

REFERENCES

Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3): 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. 2003. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3): 1301–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashwin, A. S., Krishnan, R. T., & George, R. 2015. Family firms in India: Family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4): 869–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athreye, S. S. 2005. The Indian software industry and its evolving service capability. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3): 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athreye, S. S., & Kapur, S. 2009. Introduction: The internationalization of Chinese and Indian firms–trends, motivations and strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2): 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, R. 2015. Japan's growing generic market woos more Indian pharma firms. Available from URL: https://www.livemint.com/Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaumik, S. K., Driffield, N., & Pal, S. 2010. Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3): 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J., Munjal, S., Enderwick, P., & Forsans, N. 2016. Cross-border acquisitions by Indian multinationals: Asset exploitation or asset augmentation? International Business Review, 25(4): 986–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calof, J. L., & Beamish, P. W. 1995. Adapting to foreign markets: Explaining internationalization. International Business Review, 4(2): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capar, N., & Kotabe, M. 2003. The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4): 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, M. 2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3): 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., Pollock, T. G., & Leary, M. M. 2003. Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking: Governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high-technology IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9): 803–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavusgil, S. T. 1980. On the internationalization process of firms. European Research, 8(6): 273–281.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, S. 2009. The influence of national culture and institutional voids on family ownership of large firms: A country level empirical study. Journal of International Management, 15(1): 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Crossland, C., & Huang, S. 2016. Female board representation and corporate acquisition intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chittoor, R., Aulakh, P. S., & Ray, S. 2015. What drives overseas acquisitions by Indian firms? A behavioral risk-taking perspective. Management International Review, 55(2): 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chittoor, R., Sarkar, M. B., Ray, S., & Aulakh, P. S. 2009. Third-world copycats to emerging multinationals: Institutional changes and organizational transformation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Organization Science, 20(1): 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. 1968. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4): 213–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L., & Certo, S. T. 2010. Ownership as a form of corporate governance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8): 1561–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contractor, F. J. 2013. ‘Punching above their weight’: The sources of competitive advantage for emerging market multinationals. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 8(4): 304–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. 2007. Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4): 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2008. The multinationalization of developing country MNEs: The case of multilatinas. Journal of International Management, 14(2): 138–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Ciravegna, L., Melgarejo, M., & Lopez, L. 2018. Home country uncertainty and the internationalization-performance relationship: Building an uncertainty management capability. Journal of World Business, 53(2): 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. 2008. Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6): 957–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Narula, R. 2015. A set of motives to unite them all?: Revisiting the principles and typology of internationalization motives. Multinational Business Review, 23(1): 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Narula, R., & Un, C. A. 2015. Internationalization motives: Sell more, buy better, upgrade and escapenull. Multinational Business Review, 23(1): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. W. 2014. What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 488–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, F., Lohrke, F. T., Fornaciari, C. J., & Turner, R. A. Jr. 2004. Slack resources and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6): 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 20–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beule, F., & Duanmu, J.-L. 2012. Locational determinants of internationalization: A firm-level analysis of Chinese and Indian acquisitions. European Management Journal, 30(3): 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, P. 2009. Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? Journal of World Business, 44(1): 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dharwadkar, B., George, G., & Brandes, P. 2000. Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 650–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreux, D. R. 1990. Financing family business: Alternatives to selling out or going public. Family Business Review, 3(3): 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, J.-L. 2012. Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Chinese Multinational Enterprises (MNEs). Journal of World Business, 47(1): 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 1980. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1): 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 1993. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Duysters, G., Jacob, J., Lemmens, C., & Jintian, Y. 2009. Internationalization and technological catching up of emerging multinationals: A comparative case study of China's Haier group. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2): 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaur, A., & Delios, A. 2015. International diversification of emerging market firms: The role of ownership structure and group affiliation. Management International Review, 55(2): 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. 2009. International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India*. British Journal of Management, 20(2): 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. 2010. Internationalization of emerging market firms: A case for theoretical extension. Advances in International Management, 23: 603–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Singh, D. 2014. Institutions, resources, and internationalization of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(1): 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. 2007. Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1): 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaur, A. S., Ma, X., & Ding, Z. 2018. Home country supportiveness/unfavorableness and outward foreign direct investment from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(3): 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakakis, D., Dauth, T., & Ruigrok, W. 2016. Too much of a good thing: Does international experience variety accelerate or delay executives’ career advancement? Journal of World Business, 51(3): 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, G., Wiklund, J., & Zahra, S. A. 2005. Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31(2): 210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. 2004. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2): 209–226.Google Scholar
Giroud, A., & Mirza, H. 2015. Refining of FDI motivations by integrating global value chains’ considerations. Multinational Business Review, 23(1): 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. 2012. Econometric analysis, 71e. Stern School of Business, New York University.Google Scholar
Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M. B., & Chittoor, R. 2010. Do international acquisitions by emerging-economy firms create shareholder value? The case of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3): 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubbi, S. R., & Elango, B. 2016. Resource deepening vs. resource extension: Impact on asset-seeking acquisition performance. Management International Review, 56(3): 353–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillén, M. F., & García-Canal, E. 2009. The American model of the multinational firm and the ‘new’ multinationals from emerging economies. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haunschild, P. R., & Beckman, C. M. 1998. When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4): 815–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1): 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutzschenreuter, T., & Gröne, F. 2009. Product and geographic scope changes of multinational enterprises in response to international competition. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(7): 1149–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Y., & Jiang, F. 2012. FDI location choice of Chinese multinationals in East and Southeast Asia: Traditional economic factors and institutional perspective. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedia, P. B., Gaffney, N., & Clampit, J. 2012. EMNEs and Knowledge-seeking FDI. Management International Review, 52(2): 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. 2005. Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6): 63–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., & Lee, S.-H. 2015. Why strategic factor markets matter: ‘New’ multinationals’ geographic diversification and firm profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4): 518–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotha, R., Zheng, Y., & George, G. 2011. Entry into new niches: The effects of firm age and the expansion of technological capabilities on innovative output and impact. Strategic Management Journal, 32(9): 1011–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1): 159–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1): 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lien, Y.-C., & Filatotchev, I. 2015. Ownership characteristics as determinants of FDI location decisions in emerging economies. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 637–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, W.-T. 2012. Family ownership and internationalization processes: Internationalization pace, internationalization scope, and internationalization rhythm. European Management Journal, 30(1): 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, W.-T. 2014. How do managers decide on internationalization processes? The role of organizational slack and performance feedback. Journal of World Business, 49(3): 396–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, W.-T., Cheng, K.-Y., & Liu, Y. 2009. Organizational slack and firm's internationalization: A longitudinal study of high-technology firms. Journal of World Business, 44(4): 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Xue, J. 2011. Ownership, strategic orientation and internationalization in emerging markets. Journal of World Business, 46(3): 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, L. E., Kundu, S. K., & Ciravegna, L. 2009. Born global or born regional? Evidence from an exploratory study in the Costa Rican software industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(7): 1228–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. 2004. International diversification and firm performance: The s-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4): 598–609.Google Scholar
Lu, J., Liu, X., & Wang, H. 2011. Motives for outward FDI of Chinese private firms: Firm resources, industry dynamics, and government policies. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J., Liu, X., Wright, M., & Filatotchev, I. 2014. International experience and FDI location choices of Chinese firms: The moderating effects of home country government support and host country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(4): 428–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunnan, R., & Haugland, S. A. 2008. Predicting and measuring alliance performance: A multidimensional analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5): 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. 2002. Capability exploitation and building in a foreign market: Implications for multinational enterprises. Organization Science, 13(1): 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2018. A general theory of springboard MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2): 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2012. Foreign direct investment strategies by developing country multinationals: A diagnostic model for home country effects. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3): 244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., Xue, Q., & Han, B. 2010. How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45(1): 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, X., Ding, Z., & Yuan, L. 2016. Subnational institutions, political capital, and the internationalization of entrepreneurial firms in emerging economies. Journal of World Business, 51(5): 843–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. 2012. Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1): 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makino, S., Lau, C.-M., & Yeh, R.-S. 2002. Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3): 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, J. A. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2006. Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. 2004. Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12): 1179–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1991. Why investors value multinationality. The Journal of Business, 64(2): 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudambi, R. 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5): 699–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S. C. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3): 574–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagaraj, R. 2006. Indian investments abroad: What explains the boom? Economic and Political Weekly, 41(46): 4716–4718.Google Scholar
Nayyar, D. 2008. The internationalization of firms from India: Investment, mergers and acquisitions. Oxford Development Studies, 36(1): 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Q., Kim, T., & Papanastassiou, M. 2018. Policy uncertainty, derivatives use, and firm-level FDI. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(1): 96–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, A. P. S. 2010. Top management team internationalization and firm performance. Management International Review, 50(2): 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2011. Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities. ISIC Rev. 3 technology intensity definition. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oesterle, M.-J., Richta, H. N., & Fisch, J. H. 2013. The influence of ownership structure on internationalization. International Business Review, 22(1): 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popli, M., Akbar, M., Kumar, V., & Gaur, A. 2017. Performance impact of temporal strategic fit: Entrainment of internationalization with pro-market reforms. Global Strategy Journal, 7(4): 354–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popli, M., & Sinha, A. K. 2014. Determinants of early movers in cross-border merger and acquisition wave in an emerging market: A study of Indian firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1–25.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2): 73–93.Google Scholar
Pradhan, J. P. 2011. Emerging multinationals: A comparison of Chinese and Indian outward foreign direct investment. Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), 3(1): 113–148.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. 2004. The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publication.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, J., & Pant, A. 2010. The liabilities of origin: An emerging economy perspective on the costs of doing business abroad. In Timothy, D., Torben, P., & Laszlo, T. (Eds.), The past, present and future of international business & management (advances in international management): 231–265. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Ramamurti, R. 2012. What is really different about emerging market multinationals? Global Strategy Journal, 2(1): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M., & Laforet, S. 2012. China's outward foreign direct investment: Location choice and firm ownership. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaswamy, K., Li, M., & Veliyath, R. 2002. Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: A study of the Indian corporate context. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4): 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravenscraft, D. J., & Scherer, F. M. 1987. Life after takeover. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(2): 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuer, J. J., Shenkar, O., & Ragozzino, R. 2004. Mitigating risk in international mergers and acquisitions: The role of contingent payouts. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rugman, A. M. 2010. Reconciling internalization theory and the eclectic paradigm. Multinational Business Review, 18(2): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rui, H., & Yip, G. S. 2008. Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective. Journal of World Business, 43(2): 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D. A., & Delios, A. 2017. Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India. Journal of World Business, 52(5): 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. 2013. Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19(3): 300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singla, C., & George, R. 2013. Internationalization and performance: A contextual analysis of Indian firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(12): 2500–2506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubner, S., Blarr, W. H., Brands, C., & Wulf, T. 2012. Organizational ambidexterity and family firm performance. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 25(2): 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4): 8–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD. 2015. World Investment Report 2015 – Reforming international investment governance. Available from URL: unctad.orgGoogle Scholar
Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. 2009. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2): 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Tulder, R. 2015. Getting all motives right: A holistic approach to internationalization motives of companies. Multinational Business Review, 23(1): 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2001. Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 457–476.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Hong, J., Kafouros, M., & Boateng, A. 2012. What drives outward FDI of Chinese firms? Testing the explanatory power of three theoretical frameworks. International Business Review, 21(3): 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Hong, J., Kafouros, M., & Wright, M. 2012. Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(7): 655–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. A., & Lewin, A. Y. 2007. Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, J., Ma, X., Lu, J. W., & Yiu, D. W. 2014. Outward foreign direct investment by emerging market firms: A resource dependence logic. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9): 1343–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yiu, D. W., Lau, C., & Bruton, G. D. 2007. International venturing by emerging economy firms: The effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., Abdelgawad, S. G., & Tsang, E. W. K. 2011. Emerging multinationals venturing into developed economies: Implications for learning, unlearning, and entrepreneurial capability. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(3): 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., Neubaum, D. O., Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. 2008. Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6): 1035–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 925–950.Google Scholar