Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:26:28.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The CEO's Representation of Demands and the Corporation'sResponse to External Pressures: Do Politically Affiliated Firms DonateMore?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Ming Jia  and
Zhe Zhang
Ming Jia
Affiliation:
Northwestern Polytechnical University, China
Zhe Zhang
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study seeks to explain why firms respond in different ways to similarexternal administrative pressures, such as government demands for charitablegiving, particularly in a transitional economy such as China's. Taking theperspective of the CEO's representation on external demands, the studyexplores the relationship between political affiliation and corporategiving, stimulated by powerful and politically affiliated CEOs, who are thegovernment's natural constituency and who comply with governmental demandsfor donation. The study introduces contingent factors that influence theCEO's perception of how to satisfy government demands, and that moderate therelationship between political affiliation and corporate giving. Usingfirm-level data of corporate contributions following the Sichuan earthquakeof May 12, 2008, we find that corporations with CEOs who hold politicalaffiliations have a significantly higher probability of donation and alsomore cash giving. This relationship is moderated by contingent factors suchas government ownership, financial condition, and concentration of votingrights.

Keywords

corporate givingearthquakespolitical affiliationrepresentation of external demands慈善捐款地震政治关联外部诉求代表
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 87 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regressions: Testing and interpreting interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. 2002. Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business Society, 41(3): 292–318.10.1177/000765030204100300310.1177/0007650302041003003Google Scholar
Barnard, J. 1997. Corporate philanthropy, executives' pet charities and the agency problem. New York Law School Review, 41: 1147–1178.Google Scholar
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S. K., & Jones, T. M. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488–506.10.2307/25697210.2307/256972Google Scholar
Berman, S. L., Phillips, R. A., & Wicks, A. C. 2006. Resource dependence, managerial discretion and stakeholder performance. [Cited 01 July 2011.] Available from URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=907721 10.2139/ssrn.907721Google Scholar
Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 600–628.10.2307/239386910.2307/2393869Google Scholar
Brown, W., Heiland, E., & Smith, J. K. 2006. Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of corporate finance, 12(5): 855–877.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2006.02.001Google Scholar
Campello, M., Graham, J., & Harvey, C. 2010. The real effects of financial constraints: Evidence from a financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(3): 470–487.10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.02.00910.1016/j.jfineco.2010.02.009Google Scholar
Chang, E. C., & Wong, S. M. L. 2009. Governance with multiple objectives: Evidence from top executive turnover in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(2): 230–244.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.10.00310.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.10.003Google Scholar
Chen, G., Firth, M., & Xu, L. 2009. Does the type of ownership control matter? Evidence from China's listed companies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(1): 171–181.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.02310.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.023Google Scholar
Chinese State Council. 2010. State Council encouragement and guide on the healthy development of private investment (in Chinese). [Cited 03 March 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2010-05/13/content_1605218.htm Google Scholar
Ciaessens, S., Feijen, E., & Laeven, L. 2008. Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3): 554–580.10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.11.00310.1016/j.jfineco.2006.11.003Google Scholar
Faccio, M. 2006. Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1): 369–386.10.1257/00028280677615770410.1257/000282806776157704Google Scholar
Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. C. 2009. Sudden deaths: Taking stock of geographic ties. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(3): 683–718.10.1017/S0022109009990068S002210900999006810.1017/S0022109009990068Google Scholar
Fan, J., Wong, P. H., & Zhang, T.J. 2005. The Emergence of Corporate Pyramids in China. [Cited 10 May 2009.] Available from URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=686582 10.2139/ssrn.686582Google Scholar
Fan, J., Wong, P. H., & Zhang, T. J. 2007. Politically-connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2): 330–357.10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.00810.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.008Google Scholar
Fisman, R. 2001. Estimating the value of political affiliations. American Economic Review, 91(4): 1095–1102.10.1257/aer.91.4.109510.1257/aer.91.4.1095Google Scholar
Fritz Institute. 2005. Logistics and the effective delivery of humanitarian relief. [Cited 12 October 2008.] Available from URL: http://www.fritzinstitute.org/PDFs/Programs/TsunamiLogistics0605.pdf Google Scholar
Fry, L. W., Keim, G. D., & Meiners, R. E. 1982. Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for-profit? Academy of Management Journal, 25(1): 94–106.10.2307/25602610.2307/256026Google Scholar
Godfrey, P. C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 777–798.10.5465/AMR.2005.1837887810.5465/amr.2005.18378878Google Scholar
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 425–445.10.1002/smj.75010.1002/smj.750Google Scholar
Hansen, W., & Mitchell, N. 2000. Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: Domestic and foreign corporations in national politics. American Political Science Review, 94(4): 891–903.10.2307/258621410.2307/2586214Google Scholar
Hart, O. 2001. Financial contracting. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4): 1079–1100.10.1257/jel.39.4.107910.1257/jel.39.4.1079Google Scholar
Hart, S. L. 2005. Capitalism at the crossroads: The unlimited business opportunities in solving the world's most difficult problems. Chicago, IL: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1): 153–161.10.2307/191235210.2307/1912352Google Scholar
Hillman, A., Keim, G., & Schuler, D. 2004. Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6): 837–857.10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003Google Scholar
Hubbard, R. G. 1998. Capital market imperfections and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1): 193–227.Google Scholar
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-XGoogle Scholar
Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. 2011. Agency costs and corporate philanthropic disaster response: The moderating role of women on two-tier boards - evidence from People's Republic of China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(9): 2011–2031.10.1080/09585192.2011.57397510.1080/09585192.2011.573975Google Scholar
Jin, H., & Qian, Y. 1998. Public versus private ownership of firms: Evidence from rural China. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3): 773–808.10.1162/00335539855574810.1162/003355398555748Google Scholar
Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. 2003. Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2): 351–382.10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00255-610.1016/S0304-405X(02)00255-6Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Cannella, A. A. Jr. 2008. Social capital among corporate upper echelons and its impacts on executive promotion in Korea. Journal of World Business, 43(1): 85–96.10.1016/j.jwb.2007.10.00910.1016/j.jwb.2007.10.009Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471–517.10.1111/0022-1082.0011510.1111/0022-1082.00115Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2): 3–27.10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-910.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Florencio, S., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. The Journal of Finance, 57(3): 1147–1170.10.1111/1540-6261.0045710.1111/1540-6261.00457Google Scholar
Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. 2008. Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2): 283–299.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.03.00110.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.03.001Google Scholar
Li, S. X., Yao, X., Sue-Chan, O, & Xi, Y. 2011. Where do social ties come from: Institutional framework and governmental tie distribution among Chinese managers. Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 97–124.10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00187.xS174087760000232110.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00187.xGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. 2006. Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: A structuration perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 747–766.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.840022410.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400224Google Scholar
Ma, D., & Parish, W. L. 2006. Tocquevillian moments: Charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Social Forces, 85(2): 943–964.10.1353/sof.2007.001610.1353/sof.2007.0016Google Scholar
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268–305.10.2307/3556659Google Scholar
Matten, D., & Moon, J. 2008. ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of coiporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 404–424.10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458Google Scholar
Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. 2011. Doing good deeds in times of need: A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations. Strategic Management Journal, 32(9): 911–929.10.1002/smj.91710.1002/smj.917Google Scholar
Muller, A., & Whiteman, G. 2009. Exploring the geography of corporate philanthropic disaster response: A study of Fortune Global 500 firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4): 589–603.10.1007/s10551-008-9710-7Google Scholar
Murtha, T., & Lcnway, S. 1994. Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational corporations’ strategic. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 113–129.10.1002/smj.4250151008Google Scholar
Navarro, P. 1988. Why do corporations give to charity? Journal of Business, 61(1): 66–75.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D., Zong, L., & Dickinson, H. 2011. The reach and influence of social capital for career advancement and firm development: Elite managers and Russia's exit from socialism. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 303–327.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145–179.10.5465/AMR.1991.427900210.2307/258610Google Scholar
Pache, A., & Santos, F. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3): 455–476.10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368Google Scholar
Petrovits, C. 2006. Corporate-sponsored foundations and earning management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(3): 335–362.10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.12.00110.1016/j.jacceco.2005.12.001Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Novak, P. 1976. Joint ventures and inter-organizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3): 398–418.10.2307/239185110.2307/2391851Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Richard, O. 2000. Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 164–177.10.2307/155637410.2307/1556374Google Scholar
Ryan, T. Y. 1997. Modern regression analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schuler, D. 1999. Corporate political action: Rethinking the economic and organizational influences. Business and Politics, 1(1): 83–97.10.1515/bap.1999.1.1.83S136952580000012710.1515/bap.1999.1.1.83Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 2001. Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. 2004. Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business & Society, 43(2): 135–161.10.1177/000765030426391910.1177/0007650304263919Google Scholar
Sethi, S. P. 2003. Setting global standards: Guidelines for creating codes of conduct in multinational corporations. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1994. Politicians and firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4): 995–1025.10.2307/211835410.2307/2118354Google Scholar
Stein, J. 2003. Agency information and corporate investment. In Constantinides, G. Harris, M. & Stulz, R. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance: 111–165. North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sun, Q., & Tong, W. 2003. China share issue privatization: The extent of its success. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(2): 183–222.10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00145-410.1016/S0304-405X(03)00145-4Google Scholar
Sun, P., Wright, M., & Mellahi, K. 2010. Is entrepreneur-politician alliance sustainable during transition? The case of management buyouts in China. Management and Organization Review, 6(1): 101–121.10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00157.x10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00157.xGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3): 801–844.10.1086/21036110.1086/210361Google Scholar
Tobin, J., & Swan, C. 1969. Money and permanent income: Some empirical tests. American Economic Review, 59(2): 285–294.Google Scholar
Wang, H., & Qjan, C. 2011. Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholders réponses and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6): 1159–1181.10.5465/amj.2009.0548Google Scholar
Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. 2008. Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1): 143–159.10.1287/orsc.1070.027110.1287/orsc.1070.0271Google Scholar
Wang, Z. 2008. A preliminary report on the great Wenchuan earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 7(2): 225–234.10.1007/s11803-008-0856-110.1007/s11803-008-0856-1Google Scholar
Wong, E. 2011. An online scandal underscores Chinese distrust of state charities. New York Times. [Cited 03 July 2011.] Available from URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/04/world/asia/04china.html?pagewanted=all Google Scholar
Yafch, Y., & Yosha, O. 2003. Large shareholders and banks: Who monitors and how? The Economic Journal, 113(484): 128–146.10.1111/1468-0297.00087Google Scholar
Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., & Zhu, J. G. 2009. Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms' response to the Sichuan earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1): 51–63.Google Scholar