Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Kirkman, Bradley L.
and
Chen, Gilad
2011.
Maximizing Your Data or Data Slicing? Recommendations for Managing Multiple Submissions from the Same Dataset.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
433.
Lee, Thomas W.
and
Mitchell, Terence R.
2011.
Working in Research Teams: Lessons from Personal Experiences.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
461.
Tsui1, Anne S.
and
Galaskiewicz, Joseph
2011.
Commitment to Excellence: Upholding Research Integrity at Management and Organization
Review.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
389.
Rupp, Deborah E.
2011.
Ethical Issues Faced by Editors and Reviewers.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
481.
Schminke, Marshall
and
Ambrose, Maureen L.
2011.
RETRACTED - Ethics and Integrity in the Publishing Process: Myths, Facts, and a Roadmap.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
397.
Leung, Kwok
2011.
Presenting Post Hoc Hypotheses as A Priori: Ethical and Theoretical Issues.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
471.
2012.
Current World Literature.
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 6,
p.
743.
Wang, Greg G.
Xiao, Jin
Zhang, Yichi
and
Li‐ping Tang, Thomas
2013.
Promoting research integrity and excellence in Chinese HRM studies.
Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
p.
4.
Colquitt, Jason A.
2013.
Data Overlap Policies at AMJ.
Academy of Management Journal,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 2,
p.
331.
Tsang, Eric W. K.
2014.
Ensuring Manuscript Quality and Preserving Authorial Voice: The Balancing Act of Editors.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 02,
p.
191.
Tsang, Eric W. K.
2014.
Ensuring Manuscript Quality and Preserving Authorial Voice: The Balancing Act of Editors.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
191.
Liu, Leigh Anne
2014.
Addressing Reviewer Comments as an Integrative Negotiation.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
183.
Petersen, Alexander M.
Pavlidis, Ioannis
and
Semendeferi, Ioanna
2014.
A Quantitative Perspective on Ethics in Large Team Science.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
923.
Liu, Leigh Anne
2014.
Addressing Reviewer Comments as an Integrative Negotiation.
Management and Organization Review,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
183.
Hollmann, Malen
Borrell, Carme
Garin, Olatz
Fernández, Esteve
and
Alonso, Jordi
2015.
Factors influencing publication of scientific articles derived from masters theses in public health.
International Journal of Public Health,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 4,
p.
495.
Farias, Salomão Alencar de
2016.
Editorial.
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 3,
BREI, VINÍCIUS ANDRADE
FARIAS, SALOMÃO ALENCAR DE
MATOS, CELSO AUGUSTO DE
and
MAZZON, JOSE AFONSO
2017.
UM GUIA DE AVALIAÇÃO DE ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS EM MARKETING.
Revista de Administração de Empresas,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 4,
p.
391.
O’Boyle, Ernest Hugh
Banks, George Christopher
and
Gonzalez-Mulé, Erik
2017.
The Chrysalis Effect.
Journal of Management,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2,
p.
376.
Butler, Nick
Delaney, Helen
and
Spoelstra, Sverre
2017.
The Gray Zone: Questionable Research Practices in the Business School.
Academy of Management Learning & Education,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
94.
Covin, Jeffrey G.
and
McMullen, Jeffery S.
2019.
Programmatic research and the case for designing and publishing from rich, multifaceted datasets: Issues and recommendations.
Journal of Business Research,
Vol. 101,
Issue. ,
p.
40.