Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:10:57.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

And Justice for All: Our Research Participants Considered as Valued Stakeholders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Thomas A. Wright
Thomas A. Wright*
Affiliation:
Kansas State University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Management scholars have suggested that our research is lacking in both relevance and meaning. In this article, I argue that a primary reason for this lack of relevance and meaning is the failure of our research to be responsive to all potential research stakeholders. Adopting the committed-to-participant research perspective, I offer suggestions for how both journal editors and organizational researchers can meaningfully include our research participants as valued stakeholders of the research process.

Keywords

committed-to-participant research (CPR) perspectivepositive researcher valuesresearch ethicsstakeholder rights忠于参与者的研究(CPR)的视角积极研究者价值观研究伦理利益相关者的权益
Type
Forum Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , November 2011 , pp. 495 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Academy of Management. 2005. Academy of Management code of ethical conduct. [Last accessed 25 October 2010.] Available from URL: http://aomonline.org.Google Scholar
Agiiinis, H., & Vaschetto, S.J. 2011. Editorial responsibility: Managing the publishing process to do good and do well. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 407–422.Google Scholar
Beyer, J. M. 1997. Building on past strengths with incremental change. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6): 1436–1442.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. 1986. Data quality and the development of organizational science: An editorial essay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 298–303.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. 1948. Action research and minority problems. In Lewin, G. W. (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics: 201–216. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. 1986. Maslach burnout inventory (2nd ed.). Palo/Vito, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E. 2011. Lessons learned, ignored, forgotten and reborn: Organizations and Management 1960 to Today. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 4–7.Google Scholar
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. 2004. Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press/Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Quick, J. O., & Wright, T. A. 2011. Character-based leadership: Context and consequences. The Leadership Quarterly (in press).Google Scholar
Rosnow, R. L. 1997. Hedgehogs, foxes, and the evolving social contract in psychological science: Ethical challenges and methodological opportunities. Psychological Methods, 2: 345–356.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. 1987. The clinical perspective in fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Slocum, J. W. Jr. 1999. Unlearning to learn. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6): 1429–1431.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellcgen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 1063–1070.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A. 2005. The role of ‘happiness’ in organizational research: Past, present and future directions. In Perrewe, P. L. & Ganster, D. C. (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 4): 221–264. Amsterdam: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A. 2006. Toward the development of a truly relational approach to the study of organizational behaviors: Further consideration of the conimitted-to-participant research perspective. In Kyriakidou, O. & Ozbilgin, M. (Eds.), Relational perspectives in organizational studies: 278–305. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A. 2010. A sense of identity does matter in achieving relevance and meaning in our work. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3: 289–292.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. 1998. Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 486–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, T. A., & Goodstcin, J. 2007. Character is not ‘dead’ in management research: A review of individual character and organizational-level virtue. Journal of Management, 33: 928–958.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A., & Hobfoll, S. E. 2004. Commitment, psychological well-being and job performance: An examination of Conservation of Resources (COR) theory and job burnout. Journal of Business and Management, 9: 389–406.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A., & Quick, J. C. 2011. The role of character in ethical leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly (in press).Google Scholar
Wright, T. A., & Sweeney, D. 1990. Correctional institution workers’ coping strategies and their effect on diastolic blood pressure. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18: 161–169.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A., & Wright, V. P. 1999. Ethical responsibility and the organizational researcher: A committcd-to-participant research perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 1107–1112.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A., & Wright, V. P. 2000. How our ‘values’ influence the manner in which organizational research is framed and interpreted. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21: 603–607.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A., & Wright, V. P. 2001. The role of injcivility in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 26: 168–170.Google Scholar
Wright, T. A., & Wright, V. P. 2002. Organizational researcher values, ethical responsibility, and the committed-to-participant research perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11:173–185.Google Scholar