Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:05:38.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WELFARE EFFECTS OF PATENT PROTECTION IN A SEMI-ENDOGENOUS GROWTH MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2018

Tatsuro Iwaisako
Tatsuro Iwaisako*
Affiliation:
Osaka University
*
Address correspondence to: Tatsuro Iwaisako, Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, 1-7 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka560-0043, Japan; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines how strengthening patent protection affects welfare in a nonscale quality-ladder model, which was developed by Segerstrom [American Economic Review 88, 1290–1310] and generalized by Li [American Economic Review 93, 1009–1017]. In the Segerstrom–Li model, patent protection creates no distortion in static allocation among the production sectors. In order to examine the welfare effects of strengthening patent protection adequately, we incorporate a competitive outside good into the Segerstrom–Li model. In the general model, we derive the welfare-maximizing degree of patent protection analytically by utilizing a linear approximation of the transition path. The result shows that the welfare-maximizing degree of patent protection is weaker when the market share of the outside good is positive than when it is zero. In other words, disregarding the static distortion that patent protection creates leads to excessive patent protection.

Keywords

R&DPatent ProtectionWelfare AnalysisSemi-Endogenous Growth
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , April 2020 , pp. 708 - 728
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Christophe Deissenberg (associate editor) and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions, which have improved this paper significantly, and Hitoshi Tanaka for helpful discussions on an earlier version. I gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (No. 25780134) and JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 16H02026, No. 17K03623). The usual disclaimer applies.

References

REFERENCES

Basu, Susanto (1996) Procyclical productivity: Increasing returns or cyclical utilization. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 709–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Angus, Cozzi, Guido, and Galli, Silvia (2012) Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation? European Economic Review 56 (4), 727–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Angus and Furukawa, Yuichi (2011) On the optimal mix of patent instruments. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35, 1964–1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Angus and Furukawa, Yuichi (2013) Patentability and knowledge spillovers of basic R&D. Southern Economic Journal 79, 928–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Angus and Pan, Shiyuan (2013) The escape-infringement effect of blocking patents on innovation and economic growth, Macroeconomic Dynamics 17 (04), 955–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozzi, Guido and Galli, Silvia (2014) Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth, Journal of Economic Growth 19 (2), 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozzi, Guido and Impullitti, Giammario (2010) Government spending composition, technical change, and wage inequality. Journal of the European Economic Association 8 (6), 1325–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozzi, Guido and Spinesi, Luca (2006) Intellectual appropriability, product differentiation, and growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics 10 (01), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cysne, Rubens P. and Turchick, David (2012) Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth revisited. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 36 (6), 851–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinopoulos, Elias and Segerstrom, Paul S. (1999) A Schumpeterian model of protection and relative wages. American Economic Review 89, 450–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinopoulos, Elias and Segerstrom, Paul S. (2007) North–South Trade and Economic Growth. CEPR discussion papers no. 5887.Google Scholar
Dinopoulos, Elias and Segerstrom, Paul S. (2010) Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics 92, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furukawa, Yuichi (2007) The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31, 3644–3670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futagami, Koichi and Iwaisako, Tatsuro (2007) Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory 132, 306–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinols, Earl and Lin, Hwan C. (2006) Global patent protection: Channels of north and south welfare gain. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30, 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan (1993) Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61, 1247–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horii, Ryo and Iwaisako, Tatsuro (2007) Economic growth with imperfect protection of intellectual property rights. Journal of Economics (Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie) 90, 45–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Impullitti, Giammario (2010) International competition and U.S. R&D subsidies: A quantitative welfare analysis. International Economic Review 51 (4), 1127–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwaisako, Tatsuro and Futagami, Koichi (2003) Patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economics (Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie) 78, 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwaisako, Tatsuro, Tanaka, Hitoshi, and Futagami, Koichi (2011) A welfare analysis of global patent protection in a model with endogenous innovation and foreign direct investment. European Economic Review 55, 1137–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, Kenneth L. (1982) An alternative to steady-state comparisons in perfect foresight models. Economics Letters 10, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, Kenneth L. (1985) On the performance of patents. Econometrica 53, 567–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan, Yum K. and Lai, Edwin L.-C. (2003) Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27, 853–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Chol-Won (2001) On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal 111, 164–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Chol-Won (2003) Endogenous growth without scale effects: Comment. American Economic Review 93, 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Hwan C. (2015) Creative destruction and optimal patent life in a variety-expansion growth model. Southern Economic Journal 81 (3), 803–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Hwan and Shampine, L. F. (2018) R&D-based calibrated growth models with finite-length patents: A novel relaxation algorithm for solving an autonomous FDE system of mixed type. Computational Economics 51 (1), 123–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehra, Rajnish and Prescott, Esward C. (2003) The equity premium in retrospect. In Constantinides, G. M., Harris, M., and Stulz, R. M. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, pp. 889–938. Amsterdam, NH: Elsevier.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, Ted and Zweimüller, Josef (2004) Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9, 81–123.Google Scholar
Parello, Carmelo P. (2008) A north–south model of intellectual property rights protection and skill accumulation. Journal of Development Economics 85, 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palokangas, Tapio (2011) Optimal patent length and breadth in an economy with creative destruction and non-diversifiable risk. Journal of Economics (Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie) 102, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretto, Pietro F. (2007) Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory 137 (1), 353–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretto, Pietro F. (2011) The growth and welfare effects of deficit–financed dividend tax cuts. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43 (5), 835–869.Google Scholar
Rivera-Batiz, Luis and Romer, Paul M. (1991) Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segerstrom, Paul S. (1998) Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review 88, 1290–1310.Google Scholar
Sener, Fuat (2001) Schumpeterian unemployment, trade and wages. Journal of International Economics 54, 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinesi, Luca (2011) Probabilistic heterogeneous patent protection and innovation incentives. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy (Contributions) 11 (1), 1–44.Google Scholar
Steger, Thomas M. (2003) The Segerstrom model: Stability, speed of convergence and policy implications. Economics Bulletin 15, 1–8.Google Scholar
Zeng, Jinli, Zhang, Jie, and Fung, Michael K. (2014) Patents and price regulation in an R&D growth model. Macroeconomic Dynamics 18, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar