Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:01:10.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative consumption, relative wealth, and long-run growth: when and why is the standard analysis prone to incorrect conclusions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2021

Franz X. Hof  and
Klaus Prettner
Franz X. Hof
Affiliation:
Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, Research Unit Economics (105-3), Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstr. 8–10, 1040 Vienna, Austria
Klaus Prettner*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital (University of Vienna, IIASA, VID/ÖAW), Vordere Zollamtsstraße 3, 1030 Vienna, Austria
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We employ a novel approach for analyzing the effects of relative consumption and relative wealth preferences on economic growth. In the pertinent literature, these effects are usually assessed by examining the dependence of the growth rate on the two parameters of the utility function that seem to measure the strength of the relative consumption and the relative wealth motives. Applying our fundamental factor approach, we identify specifications in which the traditional approach yields incorrect qualitative conclusions. The problematic specifications have the common unpleasant property that the parameter that seems to determine the strength of the relative consumption motive actually also affects the elasticity of intertemporal substitution of absolute consumption (and the strength of the relative wealth motive). Since the standard approach is unaware of the additional effect(s), it attributes the total change in the growth rate incorrectly to the change in the strength of the relative consumption motive.

Keywords

Quest for statusEconomic growthSocial optimalityDeep factorsD31D62O10O30
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 250 - 274
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abel, A. (1990) Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the Joneses. American Economic Review 80(2), 38–42.Google Scholar
Abel, A. (2005) Optimal taxation when consumers have endogenous benchmark levels of consumption. Review of Economic Studies 72(1), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Carrera, J., Caballe, J. and Raurich, X. (2008) Can consumption spillovers be a source of equilibrium indeterminacy? Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 32(9), 2883–2902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., Monteiro, G. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2004) Habit formation, catching up with the Joneses, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9(1), 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 29(3), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, R. C., Bhattacharya, J. and Bunzel, H. (2010) Choosing to keep up with the Joneses and income inequality. Economic Theory 45(3), 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995) Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Carroll, C. D., Overland, J. and Weil, D. N. (1997) Comparison utility in a growth model. Journal of Economic Growth 2(4), 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, J., Wang, W. and Chen, Y. (2018) Do status-seeking motives enhance economic growth? A small open economy model. Macroeconomic Dynamics 22(2), 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, B.-L. (2007) Multiple BGPs in a growth model with habit persistence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39(1), 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. C. (2007) Confidence-enhanced economic growth. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 7(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneo, G. and Jeanne, O. (1997) On relative wealth effects and the optimality of growth. Economics Letters 54(1), 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneo, G. and Jeanne, O. (2001a) Status, the distribution of wealth, and growth. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 103(2), 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneo, G. and Jeanne, O. (2001b) On relative wealth effects and long-run growth. Research in Economics 55(4), 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. H. (2010) Relative wealth, growth, and transitional dynamics: The small open economy case. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14(S2), 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. H. and Heijdra, B. J. (2009) Keeping up with the ageing Joneses. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33(1), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. H. and Hof, F. X. (2000) Relative consumption, economic growth, and taxation. Journal of Economics 72(3), 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. H. and Hof, F. X. (2005) Status seeking in the small open economy. Journal of Macroeconomics 27(2), 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. H. and Hof, F. X. (2008) The quest for status and endogenous labor supply: The relative wealth framework. Journal of Economics 93(2), 109–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futagami, K. and Shibata, A. (1998) Keeping one step ahead of the Joneses: Status, the distribution of wealth, and long run growth. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 36(1), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, J. (1994) Keeping up with the Joneses: Consumption externalities, portfolio choice, and asset prices. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 26(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
García-Peñalosa, C. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2008) Consumption externalities: A representative consumer model when agents are heterogeneous. Economic Theory 37(3), 439–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, S. and Wendner, R. (2014) Positional Preferences, Endogenous Growth, and Optimal Income- and Consumption Taxation. MPRA Paper No. 60337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, S. and Wendner, R. (2018) Positional preferences and efficient capital accumulation when households exhibit a preference for wealth. Oxford Economic Papers 70(1), 114–140.Google Scholar
Grossmann, V. (1998) Are status concerns harmful for growth? Finanzarchiv 55(3), 357–373.Google Scholar
Harbaugh, R. (1996) Falling behind the Joneses: Relative consumption and the growth-savings paradox. Economics Letters 53(3), 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hof, F. X. and Prettner, K. (2016) The quest for status and R&D-Based growth. Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences, Band 12. http://opus.uni-hohenheim.de/volltexte/2016/1270/.Google Scholar
Hof, F. X. and Prettner, K. (2019) The quest for status and R&D-Based growth. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 162(C), 290–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson-Stenman, O., Carlsson, F. and Daruvala, D. (2002) Measuring future grandparents’ preferences for equality and relative standing. The Economic Journal 112(479), 362–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. I. (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103(4), 759–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarl, T. (2017) Status race for health, fiscal policy, elastic labor supply, and endogenous growth. University of Bremen, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Knell, M. (2009) The optimal mix between funded and unfunded pension systems when people care about relative consumption. Economica 77(308), 710–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyuncu, M. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2010) Aggregate and distributional effects of tax policy with interdependent preference: The role of “catching up with the Joneses”. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14(S2), 200–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W.-F. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2005) Consumption externalities, production externalities, and long-run macroeconomic efficiency. Journal of Public Economics 89(5–6), 1097–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljungqvist, L. and Uhlig, H. (2000) Tax policy and aggregate demand management under catching up with the Joneses. American Economic Review 90(3), 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamoto, Y. (2009) Jealousy and underconsumption in a one-sector model with wealth preference. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33(12), 2015–2029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pham, T. K. C. (2019) Keeping up with or running away from the Joneses: The Barro model revisited. Journal of Economics 126, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, M. (1997) Conspicuous consumption, economic growth, and taxation. Journal of Economics 66(1), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riegler, M. (2009) Vermögens- und Konsumexternalitäten in einem Modell mit endogenem Wachstum. Master thesis, Vienna University of Technology. Available at http://repositum.tuwien.ac.at/obvutwhs/download/pdf/1595833?originalFilename=true.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94(5), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5/2), 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strulik, H. (2015) How status concerns can make us rich and happy. Economica 82(S1), 1217–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tournemaine, F. and Tsoukis, C. (2008) Relative consumption, relative wealth and growth. Economics Letters 100(2), 314–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnovsky, S. J. and Monteiro, G. (2007) Consumption externalities, production externalities, and efficient capital accumulation under time non-separable preferences. European Economic Review 51(2), 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Long, N. and Shimomura, K. (2004) Relative wealth, status-seeking, and catching-up. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 53(4), 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendner, R. (2010) Growth and keeping up with the Joneses. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 14(S2), 176–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendner, R. (2015) Do Positional Preferences for Wealth and Consumption Cause Inter-Temporal Distortions? MPRA Paper No. 64086.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Hof and Prettner supplementary material

Hof and Prettner supplementary material

Download Hof and Prettner supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 333.3 KB