Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T17:53:33.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON OPTIMAL CAPITAL TAXATION WITH PREFERENCE EXTERNALITIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

Cheng-Wei Chang  and
Ching-Chong Lai
Cheng-Wei Chang*
Affiliation:
Tunghai University
Ching-Chong Lai
Affiliation:
Academia Sinica National Cheng-Chi University National Sun Yat-Sen University Feng Chia University
*
Address correspondence to: Dr. Cheng-Wei Chang, Department of Economics, Tunghai University, Taichung 40704, Taiwan; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper extends the Chamley–Judd framework by introducing preference externalities in a neoclassical growth model, and finds that the optimal capital tax increases with the extent of social-status seeking or negative leisure externalities. Furthermore, this paper finds that differences in leisure externalities lead to a distinct impact on optimal factor income taxes, and hence may serve as a plausible vehicle to explain the empirical differences in factor income taxation in the United States and Europe.

Keywords

Leisure externalitiesSocial statusOptimal taxation
Type
Note
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , April 2020 , pp. 729 - 746
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are deeply grateful to William A. Barnett (Editor), an Associate Editor, and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments that substantially improved the paper. We are also indebted to Kuan-jen Chen, Ping-ho Chen, Hsun Chu, Mei-ying Hu, Wei-chi Huang, and Shi-fu Liu, who provided us with helpful suggestions in relation to earlier versions of this article. Any shortcomings are, however, the authors’ responsibility.

References

REFERENCES

Aguiar-Conraria, L. and Wen, Y. (2008) A note on oil dependence and economic instability. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12, 717–723.10.1017/S1365100508070429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., and Sacerdoto, B. (2006) Work and leisure in the United States and Europe: Why so different?. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 20, 1–64.10.1086/ma.20.3585411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Cuadrado, F. (2007) Envy, leisure, and restrictions on working hours. Canadian Journal of Economics 40, 1286–1310.10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00452.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azariadis, C., Chen, B. L., Lu, C. H., and Wang, Y. C. (2013) A two-sector model of endogenous growth with leisure externalities. Journal of Economic Theory 148, 843–857.10.1016/j.jet.2012.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassou, S. P. and Lansing, K. J. (2006) Tax reform with useful public expenditures. Journal of Public Economic Theory 8, 631–676.10.1111/j.1467-9779.2006.00282.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamley, C. (1986) Optimal taxation of capital income in general equilibrium with infinite lives. Econometrica 54, 607–622.10.2307/1911310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, B. L. and Lu, C. H. (2013) Optimal factor tax incidence in two-sector human capital-based models. Journal of Public Economics 97, 75–94.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D., and Weber, A. (2011) Are micro and macro labor supply elasticities consistent? a review of evidence on the intensive and extensive margins. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 101, 471–475.10.1257/aer.101.3.471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., and Shields, M. A. (2008) Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature 46, 95–144.10.1257/jel.46.1.95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conesa, J. C., Kitao, S., and Krueger, D. (2009) Taxing capital? Not a bad idea after all!. American Economic Review 99, 25–48.10.1257/aer.99.1.25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, T. F. and Prescott, E. C. (1995) Economic Growth and Business Cycles. In Cooley, T. F. (ed.), Frontiers of Business Cycle Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corneo, G. and Jeanne, O. (2001) Status, the distribution of wealth, and growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 103, 283–293.10.1111/1467-9442.00245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domeij, D. (2005) Optimal capital taxation and labor market search. Review of Economic Dynamics 8, 623–650.10.1016/j.red.2005.01.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupor, B. and Liu, W. F. (2003) Jealousy and equilibrium overconsumption. American Economic Review 93, 423–428.10.1257/000282803321455395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein Shapiro, A. and Mandelman, F. (2016) Remittances, entrepreneurship, and employment dynamics over the business cycle. Journal of International Economics 103, 184–199.10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. H. (2010) Relative wealth, growth, and transitional dynamics: The small open economy case. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14, 224–242.10.1017/S1365100510000398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliessbach, K., Weber, B., Trautner, P., Dohmen, T., Sunde, U., Elger, C., and Falk, A. (2007) Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum. Science 318, 1305–1308.10.1126/science.1145876CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futagami, K. and Shibata, A. (1998) Keeping one step ahead of the joneses: Status, the distribution of wealth, and long run growth. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 36, 109–126.10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00072-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, J., López-Salido, J. D., and Vallés, J. (2007) Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. Journal of the European Economic Association 5, 227–270.10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.1.227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Peñalosa, C. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2011) Taxation and income distribution dynamics in a neoclassical growth model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43, 1543–1577.10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00458.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamermesh, D. (2002) Timing, togetherness and time windfalls. Journal of Population Economics 15, 601–623.10.1007/s001480100092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, G. D. and Imrohoroglu, S. (2008) Consumption over the life cycle: The role of annuities. Review of Economic Dynamics 11, 566–583.10.1016/j.red.2007.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiraguchi, R. and Shibata, A. (2015) Taxing capital is a good idea: The role of idiosyncratic risk in an OLG model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 52, 258–269.10.1016/j.jedc.2014.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, K. X. D. and He, H. (2015) Why do Americans spend so much more on health care than Europeans? Working papers 13-0021, Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Imai, S. and Keane, M. P. (2004) Intertemporal labor supply and human capital accumulation. International Economic Review 45, 601–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S. and Osberg, L. (2005) Nobody to play with? the implications of leisure coordination. In Hamermesh, D. and Pfann, G. (eds.), The Economics of Time Use: Contributions to Economic Analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Judd, K. L. (1985) Redistributive taxation in a simple perfect foresight model. Journal of Public Economics 28, 59–83.10.1016/0047-2727(85)90020-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnizova, L. (2010) The spirit of capitalism and expectation-driven business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics 57, 739–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, P., Quadrini, V., and Ríos-Rull, J. (2005) Optimal time-consistent taxation with international mobility of capital. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 5, 1–36.Google Scholar
Kydland, F. E. and Prescott, E. C. (1991) Hours and employment variation in business cycle theory. Economic Theory 1, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C. C., Chin, C. T., and Chen, K. J. (2017) Oil dependence, international borrowings, and economic instability in a small open economy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 21, 889–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, R. (2005) Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Lu, C. H. and Chen, B. L. (2015) Optimal capital taxation in a neoclassical growth model. Journal of Public Economic Theory 17, 257–269.10.1111/jpet.12100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maebayashi, N., Hori, T., and Futagami, K. (2017) Dynamic analysis of reductions in public debt in an endogenous growth model with public capital. Macroeconomic Dynamics 21, 1454–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, C. (2007) Average tax rates on consumption, investment, labor and capital in the OECD 1950–2003, Working paper, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Mendoza, E. G., Razin, A., and Tesar, L. (1994) Effective tax rates in macroeconomics: Cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 297–323.10.1016/0304-3932(94)90021-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, W. B. (2016) Reconciling micro and macro estimates of the frisch labor supply elasticity. Economic Inquiry 54, 100–120.10.1111/ecin.12252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, R. (2006) Understanding differences in hours worked. Review of Economic Dynamics 9, 365–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, R. and Wallenius, J. (2009) Micro and macro elasticities in a life cycle model with taxes. Journal of Economic Theory 144, 2277–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straub, L. and Werning, I. (2015) Positive long run capital taxation: Chamley-Judd revisited, NBER working paper no. 20441.Google Scholar
Turnovsky, S. J. (2000) Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar