Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:51:24.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON MUTH'S RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS HYPOTHESIS: A TIME-VARYING COEFFICIENT INTERPRETATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2006

P.A.V.B. SWAMY  and
GEORGE S. TAVLAS
P.A.V.B. SWAMY
Affiliation:
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor
GEORGE S. TAVLAS
Affiliation:
Economic Research Department, Bank of Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under certain interpretations of its coefficients, a specified econometric model is an exact representation of the “true” model, defining the “objective” probability distribution. This note enumerates these interpretations. In the absence of the conditions implied by these interpretations, the econometric model is misspecified. The note shows that model misspecifications prevent the satisfaction of a necessary and sufficient condition for individual expectations to be rational in Muth's sense. Whereas restrictive forms of econometric models can give very inaccurate predictions, this note describes the conditions under which the predictions generated from time-varying coefficient models coincide with the predictions generated from the relevant economic theory.

Keywords

Rational ExpectationMuth's DefinitionModel MisspecificationStochastic Coefficient Model
Type
NOTES
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , June 2006 , pp. 415 - 425
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson Evan W., Lars P. Hansen, and Thomas J. Sargent 2003 A quartet of semigroups for model specification, robustness, prices of risk, and model detection. Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 68– 123.Google Scholar
Basmann Robert L. 1988 Causality tests and observationally equivalent representations of econometric models. Journal of Econometrics, Annals 39, 69– 104.Google Scholar
Chang I-Lok., P.A.V.B. Swamy, Charles Hallahan, and George S. Tavlas 2000 A computational approach to finding causal economic laws. Computational Economics 16, 105– 136.Google Scholar
Hansen Lars P. and Thomas J. Sargent 2004 Robust Control and Economic Model Uncertainty. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Lehmann Erich L. and George Casella 1998 Theory of Point Estimation, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Lucas Robert E. Jr. 1976 Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. In Karl Brunner and Allan Meltzer (eds.), The Phillips Curve and Labor Market, pp. 19– 46. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Muth John F. 1961 Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29, 315– 335.Google Scholar
Pratt John W. and Robert Schlaifer 1984 On the nature and discovery of structure (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 9– 21, 29– 33.Google Scholar
Pratt John W. and Robert Schlaifer 1988 On the interpretation and observation of laws. Journal of Econometrics, Annals 39, 23– 52.Google Scholar
Rao C.R. 1973 Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Swamy P.A.V.B. and George S. Tavlas 2001 Random coefficient models. In Badi H. Baltagi (ed.), A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics, pp. 410– 428. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Swamy P.A.V.B. and George S. Tavlas 2005 Theoretical conditions under which monetary policies are effective and practical obstacles to their verification. Economic Theory 25, 999– 1006.Google Scholar
Swamy P.A.V.B., Jatinder S. Mehta, and Rao N. Singamsetti 1996 Circumstances in which different criteria of estimation can be applied to estimate policy effects. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inferences 50, 121– 153.Google Scholar
Swamy P.A.V.B., George S. Tavlas, and I-Lok Chang 2005 How stable are monetary policy rules: Estimating the time-varying coefficients in monetary policy reaction function for the U.S. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 49, 575– 590.Google Scholar
Swamy P.A.V.B., I-Lok Chang, Jatinder S. Mehta, and George S. Tavlas 2003 Correcting for omitted-variable and measurement-error bias in autoregressive model estimation with panel data. Computational Economics 22, 225– 253.Google Scholar