Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:31:26.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LEARNING, HEDGING, AND THE NATURAL RATE HYPOTHESIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Thomas E. Cone  and
Paul Shea
Thomas E. Cone
Affiliation:
SUNY Brockport
Paul Shea*
Affiliation:
Bates College
*
Address correspondence to: Paul Shea, Bates College, 270 Pettengill Hall, Leviston, ME 04240, USA; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We assume that firms are more risk averse than households and that they manage their risk through a financial sector, which consists of learning and hedging. Firms that learn (by observing demand shocks) face less uncertainty and produce more than firms that hedge (by selling future production at a fixed price). If a policy or parameter change stabilizes the economy, then there is less learning and usually less production. Welfare, however, is usually maximized when the financial sector, which requires inputs but does not directly provide utility or affect production, is smallest. Monetary policy can improve welfare by either taxing learning or subsidizing hedging. If firms are risk averse over nominal profits instead of real profits, then interest rate policy can also improve welfare by stabilizing prices and thus minimizing the size of the financial sector.

Keywords

Risk ManagementBounded RationalityHeterogeneous BeliefsOptimal Monetary Policy
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , July 2019 , pp. 2009 - 2034
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank two anonymous referees, George Evans, as well as seminar participants at the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics, SUNY Brockport, the University of Kentucky, and Bates College for helpful comments. All errors are the authors' responsibility.

References

REFERENCES

Amihud, Y. and Lev, B. (1981) Risk reduction as managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell Journal of Economics 12, 605–617.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1995) Inflation and economic growth. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 35, 166–176.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1996) Inflation and growth. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 78 (3), 153–169.Google Scholar
Benigno, P. and Paciello, L. (2014) Monetary policy, doubts, and asset prices. Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 85–98.Google Scholar
Bodnar, Gordon M., Hayt, Gregory S., and Marston, Richard C. (1998) 1998 Wharton survey of financial risk management by U.S. non-financial firms. Financial Management 27, 70–91.Google Scholar
Branch, W. A. and Evans, G. W. (2011) Learning about risk and return: A simple model of bubbles and crashes. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3 (3), 159–191.Google Scholar
Choudhary, A. and Levine, P. (2010) Risk averse firms and employment dynamics. Oxford Economics Papers 62 (3), 578–602.Google Scholar
Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., and Evans, C. (1997) Sticky price and limited participation models of money: A comparison. European Economic Review 41, 1201–1249.Google Scholar
Cooley, T. and Nam, K. (1998) Asymmetric information, financial intermediation and business cycles. Economic Theory 12, 599–620.Google Scholar
Evans, G. and Honkapohja, S. (2001) Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geczy, C., Minton, B., and Schrand, C. (1997) Why firms use currency derivatives. Journal of Finance 52, 1323–1254.Google Scholar
Guay, W. (1999) The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: An analysis of the magnitude of and determinates. Journal of Financial Economics 53, 43–71.Google Scholar
Hall, B. and Liebman, J. (1998) Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3), 653–690.Google Scholar
Huizinga, J. (1993) Inflation uncertainty, relative Price Uncertainty, and investment in U.S. manufacturing. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking: Inflation Uncertainty: A Conference Sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 25 (3), 521–549.Google Scholar
May, D. (1995) Do managerial motives influence firm risk reduction strategies. Journal of Finance 50 (4), 1291–1308.Google Scholar
Orphanides, A. and Williams, J. (2007) Robust monetary policy with imperfect knowledge. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 1407–1435.Google Scholar
Parke, W. and Waters, G. (2007) An evolutionary game theory explanation of ARCH. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31 (7), 2234–2262.Google Scholar
Temple, J. (2000) Inflation and growth: Stories short and tall. Journal of Economic Surveys 14 (4), 395–426.Google Scholar
Tufano, P. (1996) Who manages risk? An empirical examination of risk management practices in the gold mining industry. Journal of Finance 51, 1097–1137.Google Scholar
Woodford, M. (2003) Interest and Prices. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar