Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:53:18.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTELLECTUAL APPROPRIABILITY, PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION, AND GROWTH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2005

GUIDO COZZI  and
LUCA SPINESI
GUIDO COZZI
Affiliation:
University of Rome “La Sapienza”
LUCA SPINESI
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Luovain and University of Rome “La Sapienza”
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the modern world, the main assets are immaterial ideas. Such assets are much more easily stolen than traditional factors such as physical capital and land. In this paper, we investigate the long-run growth effects of intellectual misappropriation at the R&D level. We adopt a generalized framework with both vertical and horizontal innovation. Inspired by recent evidence and by the patent law, we assume that only vertical innovations can be spied, because they are less easily patented than horizontal innovations. The main results are: (1) despite growing population, the fraction of labor engaged in spying activities tends to be constant; (2) in economies in which the R&D process is more vulnerable to ideas theft, growth rates are lower but product differentiation will be more intense; (3) intellectual misappropriation neutralizes the positive growth effect of R&D subsidies but not their positive level effects.

Keywords

Schumpeterian GrowthVertical InnovationHorizontal InnovationIndustrial EspionageR&D
Type
ARTICLES
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 39 - 55
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghion Philippe and Peter Howitt 1992 A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60, 323– 351.Google Scholar
Aghion Philippe and Peter Howitt 1998 Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cozzi Guido 2001 Inventing or spying? Implications for growth. Journal of Economic Growth 6, 55– 77.Google Scholar
Cozzi Guido 2005 Self-fulfilling prophecies and the composition of innovation. European Economic Review 39, 637– 637.Google Scholar
DiMasi Joseph A., Ronald W. Hansen and Henry G. Grabowsky 2003 The price of innovation: New estimates of drug development cost. Journal of Health Economics 22, 151– 185.Google Scholar
Grossman Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman 1991 Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grossman Herschel 2001 Inventors and Pirates: Creativity Activity and Intellectual Property Rights. Brown University and Russell Sage Foundation, Mimeo.
Howitt Peter 1999 Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy 107, 715– 730.Google Scholar
Jones Charles 1995 R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103, 759– 784.Google Scholar
Jones Charles 1999 Growth: With or without scale effects? American Economic Review P&P 82, 139– 144.Google Scholar
Jones Charles 2005 Growth and Ideas, In P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Peretto Pietro F. 1998 Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3, 283– 311.Google Scholar
Schumpeter Joseph A. 1934 The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter Joseph A. 1939 Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.