Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:43:15.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IDENTIFYING THE SUBSTITUTION EFFECT OF TEMPORARY AGENCY EMPLOYMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2015

Elke Jahn  and
Enzo Weber
Elke Jahn*
Affiliation:
IAB, University of Bayreuth and IZA
Enzo Weber
Affiliation:
IAB, University of Regensburg and IOS Regensburg
*
Address correspondence to: Elke Jahn, Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Regensburger Straße 104, 90478 Nuremberg, Germany; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates whether temporary agency employment complements or substitutes for regular employment. We use unique administrative data that provide information on the overall size of the German market for temporary agency workers for the period 1991–2010. To take into account the interaction between the two employment forms, we identify a SVAR model with correlated innovations by volatility regimes. We find that a positive shock to temporary agency employment increases overall employment, but also leads to substitution for regular jobs.

Keywords

Temporary Agency EmploymentSubstitution EffectIdentificationGermany
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 20 , Issue 5 , July 2016 , pp. 1264 - 1281
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abraham, Katherine (1990) Restructuring the employment relationship: The growth of market-mediated work arrangements. In Abraham, Katherine and McKersie, Robert (eds.), New Developments in the Labour Market: Toward a New Institutional Paradigm, pp. 85–119. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andersson-Joona, Pernilla and Wadensjö, Eskil (2011) The Price for Flexibility–-The Temp Worker Wage Gap in Sweden. IZA discussion paper, Bonn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoni, Manfred and Jahn, Elke J. (2009) Do changes in regulation affect employment duration in temporary work agencies? Industrial and Labor Relations Review 62, 226–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, David (2001) Why do temporary help firms provide free general skills training. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 1409–1448.Google Scholar
Autor, David and Houseman, Susan (2010) Do temporary help jobs improve labor market outcomes for low-skilled workers? Evidence from “work first.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2, 96–128.Google Scholar
Bardasi, Elena and Francesconi, Marco (2004) The impact of atypical employment on individual well-being: Evidence from a panel of British workers. Social Science and Medicine 58, 1671–1688.Google Scholar
Baumann, Florian, Mechtel, Mario, and Stähler, Nikolai (2011) Employment protection and temporary work agencies. Labour 25, 308–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, Michael, Binz, Andrea, and Schauenberg, Bernd (2007) Fixed-Term Employment and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Individual-Level Data Accounting for Selectivity Bias. WWZ discussion paper, Basel 29.Google Scholar
Bentolila, Samuel and Bertola, Giuseppe (1990) Firing costs and labour demand: How bad is Eurosclerosis? Review of Economic Studies 57, 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier and Landier, Augustin (2002) The perverse effects of partial labour market reform: Fixed-term contracts in France. Economic Journal 112, F189–213.Google Scholar
Boeri, Tito (2011) Institutional reforms and dualism in European labor markets. In Ashenfelter, Orley and Card, David (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4b, Chap. 13, pp. 1173–1236. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Boeri, Tito and Garibaldi, Pietro (2007) Two-tier reforms of employment protection: A honeymoon effect? Economic Journal 117, 357–385.Google Scholar
Booth, Allison, Francesconi, Marco, and Frank, Jeff (2002) Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends? Economic Journal 112, F189–F213.Google Scholar
Bryson, Alex (2013) Do temporary agency workers affect workplace performance? Journal of Productivity Analysis 39, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahuc, Pierre and Postel-Vinay, Fabien (2002) Temporary jobs, employment protection and labour market performance. Labour Economics 9, 63–91.Google Scholar
CIETT (2013) Agency work indicators. Available online: http://www.ciett.org.Google Scholar
Federal Employment Agency (2012) Arbeitsmarktberichterstattung: Der Arbeitsmarkt in Deutschland, Zeitarbeit—Aktuelle Entwicklungen. Federal Employment Agency, Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Garcia-Serrano, Carlos, Hernanz, Virginia, and Toharia, Luis (2011) Mind the gap, please! The effect of temporary help agencies on the consequences of work accidents. Journal of Labor Research 31, 162–182.Google Scholar
Green, Colin P. and Heywood, John S. (2011) Flexible contracts and subjective well-being. Economic Inquiry 49, 716–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamersma, Sarah, Heinrich, Carolyn, and Mueser, Peter (2014) Temporary help work: Earnings, wages, and multiple job holding. Industrial Relations 53, 72–100.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Boris and Mueller, Stefan (2012) The productivity effect of temporary agency work: Evidence from German panel data. Economic Journal 122, F216–F235.Google Scholar
Houseman, Susan, Kalleberg, Arne L., and Erickcek, George A. (2003) The role of temporary agency employment in tight labor markets. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 57, 105–127.Google Scholar
Ichino, Andrea, Mealli, Fabrizia, and Nannicini, Tommaso (2008) From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: What can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity? Journal of Applied Econometrics 23, 305–327.Google Scholar
Jahn, Elke J. (2010) Reassessing the wage penalty for temporary agency workers in Germany. Journal of Economics and Statistics 2, 208–233.Google Scholar
Jahn, Elke J. and Bentzen, Jan (2012) What drives the demand for temporary agency workers. Labour 26, 341–355.Google Scholar
Jahn, Elke J., Riphahn, Regina, and Schnabel, Claus (2012) Feature: Flexible forms of employment: Boon and bane. Economic Journal 122, F115–F124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Lawrence M. (2010) Employment protection reforms, employment and the incidence of temporary jobs: 1996–2001. Labour Economics 17, 1–15.Google Scholar
Kvasnicka, Michael (2009) Does temporary agency work provide a stepping stone to regular employment? In Autor, David (ed.), Studies of Labor Market Intermediation, pp. 335–372. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lanne, Morkha and Luetkepohl, Helmut (2010) Structural vector autoregressions with nonnormal residuals. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 28, 159–168.Google Scholar
Mitra, Sinchan and Sinclair, Tara (2012) Output fluctuations in the G-7: An unobserved components approach. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16, 396–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neugart, Michael and Storrie, Donald (2006) The emergence of temporary work agencies. Oxford Economic Papers 58, 137–156.Google Scholar
OECD (2004) Employment Outlook. Paris.Google Scholar
Oi, Walter (1962) Labor as a quasi-fixed factor. Journal of Political Economy 70, 538–555.Google Scholar
Rigobon, Roberto (2003) Identification through heteroscedasticity. Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 777–792.Google Scholar
Saint-Paul, Gilles (1996) Dual Labor Markets, A Macroeconomic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Luis M. and Sullivan, Daniel G. (1998) Wage Differentials for Temporary Services Work: Evidence from Administration Data. Working paper WP-98-23, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 32.Google Scholar
Sentana, Enrique and Fiorentini, Gabriele (2001) Identification, estimation and testing of conditionally heteroskedastic factor models. Journal of Econometrics 102, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venn, Daniele (2009) Legislation, Collective Bargaining and Enforcement: Updating the OECD Employment Protection Indicators. Employment and migration working paper 89, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Weber, Enzo (2010) Structural conditional correlation. Journal of Financial Econometrics 8, 392–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Enzo (2011) Analyzing US output and the Great Moderation by simultaneous unobserved components. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43, 1579–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar