Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:37:18.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXPLAINING INVENTORIES: A BUSINESS CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF THE STOCKOUT AVOIDANCE AND (S,s) MOTIVES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2007

AUBHIK KHAN  and
JULIA K. THOMAS
AUBHIK KHAN
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
JULIA K. THOMAS
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and NBER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluate two leading explanations for inventories, the (S,s) and stockout avoidance motives, examining each within dynamic stochastic general equilibrium environments. We find that the (S,s) model is far more consistent with the cyclical behavior of aggregate inventories in the postwar United States when fluctuations arise from technology shocks, rather than preference shocks, whereas the converse is true for the stockout avoidance model. The (S,s) model succeeds in explaining the average magnitude of inventories in the U.S. economy and in reproducing the cyclical regularities involving inventories and other aggregate series. The stockout avoidance model does not. Even with idiosyncratic risk added to strengthen it, the stockout avoidance motive is insufficient to generate stocks near the data without destroying model performance along other important margins. Moreover, it appears incapable of sustaining inventories alongside capital. These findings suggest a fundamental flaw in reduced-form inventory models where stocks are loosely rationalized by this motive.

Keywords

Inventory Investment(S,s) PoliciesBuffer-Stock MotiveTechnology ShocksPreference Shocks
Type
ARTICLES
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , November 2007 , pp. 638 - 664
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bils Mark and James A. Kahn 2000 What inventory behavior tells us about the business cycle. American Economic Review 90, 458– 481.Google Scholar
Blinder Alan S. 1981 Inventories and the structure of macro models. American Economic Review 71 (2), 11– 16.Google Scholar
Blinder Alan S. and Louis J. Maccini 1991 Taking stock: a critical assessment of recent research on inventories. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 73– 96.Google Scholar
Caplin Andrew S. 1985 The variability of aggregate demand with (S,s) inventory policies. Econometrica 53, 1395– 1410.Google Scholar
Christiano Lawrence J. 1988 Why does inventory investment fluctuate so much? Journal of Monetary Economics 21, 247– 280.Google Scholar
Coen-Pirani Daniele 2004 Markups, aggregation, and inventory adjustment. American Economic Review 94 (5), 1328– 1353.Google Scholar
Eichenbaum Martin S. 1984 Rational expectations and the smoothing properties of inventories of finished goods. Journal of Monetary Economics 14 (1), 71– 96.Google Scholar
Fisher Jonas D.M. and Andreas Hornstein 2000 (S,s) inventory policies in general equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 67, 117– 145.Google Scholar
Hansen Gary D. 1985 Indivisible labor and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 16, 309– 327.Google Scholar
Jorgenson Dale W., F.M. Gollop and B.M. Fraumeni 1999 Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth. New York: toExcel.
Kahn James A. 1987 Inventories and the volatility of production. American Economic Review 77, 667– 679.Google Scholar
Kahn James A., McConnell Margaret and G. Perez-Quiros 2002 On the causes of the increased stability of the U.S. economy. FRBNY Economic Policy Review 8, 183– 202.Google Scholar
Khan Aubhik and Julia K. Thomas 2005 Inventories and the Business Cycle: An Equilibrium Analysis of (S,s) Policies. Working paper, University of Minnesota.
King Robert G. and Sergio T. Rebelo 1999 Resuscitating real business cycles. In M. Woodford and J. Taylor (eds.). Handbook of Macroeconomics IB, pp. 927– 1007. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Kydland Finn E. and Edward C. Prescott 1982 Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econo-metrica 50, 1345– 1370.Google Scholar
Mehra Rajnish and Edward C. Prescott 1985 The equity premium: a puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 145– 161.Google Scholar
Prescott Edward C. 1986 Theory ahead of business cycle measurement. Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 10, 9– 22.Google Scholar
Ramey Valerie A. 1991 Nonconvex costs and the behavior of inventories. Journal of Political Economy 99, 306– 334.Google Scholar
Ramey Valerie A. and Daniel J. Vine 2004a Tracking the Source of the Decline in GDP Volatility: An Analysis of the Automobile Industry. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.
Ramey Valerie A. and Daniel J. Vine 2004b Why Do Real and Nominal Inventory–Sales Ratios Have Different Trends? Working paper, University of California, San Diego.
Ramey Valerie A. and Kenneth D. West 1999 Inventories. In M. Woodford and J. Taylor (eds.). Handbook of Macroeconomics IB, pp. 863– 922. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Rogerson Richard 1988 Indivisible labor, lotteries and equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics 21, 3– 16.Google Scholar
Scarf Herbert E. 1960 The optimality of (S,s) policies in the dynamic inventory problem. In K.J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and H. Scarf (eds.). Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, pp. 196– 202. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Schuh Scott 1996 Evidence on the Link Between Firm-Level and Aggregate Inventory Behavior. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 96-46, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Stock James R. and Douglas M. Lambert 1987 Strategic Logistics Management. Homewood, IL: IRWIN.
Stock James H. and Mark W. Watson 2003 Has the Business Cycle Changed? Evidence and Explanations. Working paper, Harvard University.