Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:17:05.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DYNAMICS OF THE CONSUMPTION–CAPITAL RATIO, THE SAVING RATE, AND THE WEALTH DISTRIBUTION IN THE NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Subrata Guha*
Affiliation:
Jawaharlal Nehru University
*
Address correspondence to: Subrata Guha, Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

The paper utilizes a common approach to derive sufficient conditions for strictly monotonic behavior of three ratios along the transition to the steady state in the Ramsey–Cass–Koopmans model: the consumption–capital ratio, the consumption–output ratio (and the saving rate), and the consumption–wage ratio. These conditions are then applied to derive additional results on the transitional dynamics of the distribution of wealth in the model (when individual consumers are differentiated by their initial wealth endowments).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvarez-Pelaez, Maria J. and Diaz, Antonia (2005) Minimum consumption and transitional dynamics in wealth distribution. Journal of Monetary Economics 52, 633667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B. (1972) Unequal Shares: The Distribution of Wealth in Britain. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J. and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier (1995) Economic Growth. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. (1986) Liberty, Market and the State: Political Economy in the 1980s. Brighton: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Caselli, Francesco and Ventura, Jaume (2000) A representative consumer theory of distribution. American Economic Review 90, 909926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, David (1965) Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. Review of Economic Studies 32, 233240.Google Scholar
Cass, David and Yaari, Menahem E. (1967) Individual saving, aggregate capital accumulation and efficient growth. In Shell, Karl (ed.), Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth, pp. 233268. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Satyajit (1994) Transitional dynamics and the distribution of wealth in a neoclassical growth model. Journal of Public Economics 54, 97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Lawrence J. (1989) Understanding Japan's saving rate: The reconstruction hypothesis. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 13, 1025.Google Scholar
Glachant, Jerome and Vellutini, Charles (2002) Quantifying the relationship between wealth distribution and aggregate growth in the Ramsey model. Economics Letters 74, 237241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guha, Subrata (2004) Wealth distribution in Ramsey–Cass–Koopmans economies: Some further results. Keio Economic Studies 41, 114.Google Scholar
King, Robert G. and Rebelo, Sergio T. (1993) Transitional dynamics and economic growth in the neoclassical model. American Economic Review 83, 908931.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. (1965) On the concept of optimal economic growth. In The Econometric Approach to Development Planning, pp. 225287. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1966. A reissue of Pontificiae Academiae Scientarium Scripta Varia 28, 225–300.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus (1992) A long-run perspective on saving. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 181196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obiols-Homs, Francesc and Urrutia, Carlos (2005) Transitional dynamics and the distribution of assets. Economic Theory 25, 381400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, Frank P. (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38, 543559.Google Scholar
Romer, David (1996) Advanced Macroeconomics. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Smetters, Kent (2003) The (interesting) dynamic properties of the neoclassical growth model with CES production. Review of Economic Dynamics 6, 697707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar