Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:34:47.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coordination in price setting and the zero lower bound: a global games approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2021

Mitsuru Katagiri
Mitsuru Katagiri*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business Administration, Hosei University, Chiyoda City, Tokyo, Japan 102-8160
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper constructs a two-period general equilibrium model with the effective lower bound of nominal interest rates and describes price competition among monopolistically competitive firms as a coordination game. While the model has multiple equilibria with different levels of inflation (positive or zero), the equilibrium selection in line with global games implies that the economy with high expected productivity growth moves into the positive inflation equilibrium. The policy analyses indicate that monetary policy measures such as an increase in the target inflation can prevent the economy from moving into the zero inflation equilibrium even with low productivity growth.

Keywords

Inflation indeterminacyeffective lower boundglobal gamesD82E31E52
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , March 2023 , pp. 379 - 398
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2021

References

Angeletos, G.-M. and Lian, C. (2016) Incomplete information in macroeconomics. In: J. B. Taylor and H. Uhlig (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 2. Handbook of Macroeconomics, chap. 0, pp. 1065–1240. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aruoba, S. B., Cuba-Borda, P. and Schorfheide, F. (2018) Macroeconomic dynamics near the ZLB: A tale of two countries., Review of Economic Studies 85, 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohe, S. and Uribe, M. (2001) The perils of Taylor rules. Journal of Economic Theory 96, 40–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohe, S. and Uribe, M. (2002) Avoiding liquidity traps. Journal of Political Economy 110, 535–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullard, J. B. (2010) Seven faces of “the Peril”. Review, 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M. and Rebelo, S. (2011) When is the government spending multiplier large? Journal of Political Economy 119, 78–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, J. H. (2011) Determinacy and identification with Taylor rules. Journal of Political Economy 119, 565–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, J. H. (2017) The new-Keynesian liquidity trap. Journal of Monetary Economics 92, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufrenot, G. and Khayat, G. (2017) Monetary policy switching in the euro area and multiple steady states: An empirical investigation. Macroeconomic Dynamics 21, 1175–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Villaverde, J., Guerron-Quintana, P. and Rubio-Ramirez, J. F. (2014) Supply-side policies and the zero lower bound. IMF Economic Review 62, 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrer, J. (2012) The role of expectations in inflation dynamics. International Journal of Central Banking, 137–165.Google Scholar
Goldstein, I. and Pauzner, A. (2005) Demand-deposit contracts and the probability of bank runs. Journal of Finance 60, 1293–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfriend, M. (2002) Monetary policy in the new neoclassical synthesis: A primer. International Finance 5(2), 165–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimaraes, B., Machado, C. and Ribeiro, M. (2016) A model of the confidence channel of fiscal policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 48, 1363–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Y. (2020) An estimated DSGE model with a deflation steady state. Macroeconomic Dynamics 24, 1151–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacoviello, M. and Michelis, A. D. (2016) Raising an inflation target: The Japanese experience with abenomics. European Economic Review 88, 67–87.Google Scholar
Kuroda, H. (2016) The Battle Against Deflation: The Evolution of Monetary Policy and Japan’s Experience, Speech at Columbia University in New York, Bank of Japan.Google Scholar
Madeira, C. and Zafar, B. (2015) Heterogeneous inflation expectations and learning. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 47(5), 867–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmendier, U. and Nagel, S. (2015) Learning from inflation experiences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(1), 53–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S. and Shin, H. S. (1998) Unique equilibrium in a model of self-fulfilling currency attacks. American Economic Review 88, 587–597.Google Scholar
Morris, S. and Shin, H. S. (2003) Global games: Theory (eds.), and applications. In: L. P. H. Mathias Dewatripont and S. J. Turnovsky Advances in Economics and Econometrics, chap. 3, pp. 56–114. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakaso, H. (2014) The Conquest of Japanese Deflation: Interim Report, Remarks at the Athens Symposium “Banking Union, Monetary Policy and Economic Growth”, Bank of Japan.Google Scholar
Taschereau-Dumouchel, M. and Schaal, E. (2018) Coordinating Business Cycles, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. B. (1999) The robustness and efficiency of monetary policy rules as guidelines for interest rate setting by the European Central Bank. Journal of Monetary Economics 43, 655–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar