Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:15:09.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ACCOUNTING FOR LIFE-CYCLE WEALTH ACCUMULATION: THE ROLE OF HOUSING INSTITUTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2011

Sang-Wook (Stanley) Cho
Sang-Wook (Stanley) Cho*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
*
Address correspondence to: Sang-Wook (Stanley) Cho, School of Economics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper constructs a quantitative general equilibrium life-cycle model with uninsurable labor income to account for the differences in wealth accumulation and homeownership between Korea and the United States. The model incorporates different structures in the housing market in the two countries, namely, the mortgage market and the rental arrangements. The results from the calibrated model quantitatively explain some empirical findings in the aggregate and life-cycle profiles of wealth and homeownership. Quantitative policy experiments show that the mortgage market alone can account for more than 40% of the differences in the aggregate homeownership ratios. When coupled with the rental arrangements, both institutions can account for approximately 52% of the differences in the cross-country homeownership ratios.

Keywords

Life-Cycle ModelConsumptionWealthHomeownershipHousing Institution
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , September 2012 , pp. 493 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, Felicitie C., Wade, Alice H., and Goss, Stephen C. (1992) Life Tables for the United States Social Security Area: 1900–2080. Actuarial study 107, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
BudríaRodríguez, Santiago Rodríguez, Santiago, Díaz-Giménez, Javier, Quadrini, Vincenzo, and Ríos-Rull, Jose-Victor (2002) Updated facts on the U.S. distributions of earnings, income and wealth. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 26 (3), 2–35.Google Scholar
Chambers, Matthew, Garriga, Carlos, and Schlagenhauf, Don E. (2009a) Accounting for changes in the homeownership rate. International Economic Review 50 (3), 677–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Matthew, Garriga, Carlos, and Schlagenhauf, Don E. (2009b) The loan structure and housing tenure decisions in an equilibrium model of mortgage choice. Review of Economic Dynamics 12 (3), 444–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Dongchul (2005) Interest Rate, Inflation, and Housing Price: With an Emphasis on Chonsei Price in Korea. NBER working paper 11054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Nardi, Mariacristina (2004) Wealth inequality and intergenerational links. Review of Economic Studies 71, 734–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, Antonia and Luengo-Prado, Maria J. (2010) The wealth distribution with durable goods. International Economic Review 51 (1), 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, Martin (2002) Housing taxation and capital accumulation. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 1461–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L. and Shapiro, Jesse M. (2002) The Benefits of the Home Mortgage Interest Deduction. NBER Working Paper 9284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Joseph and Martin, Robert (2003) Precautionary Savings and the Wealth Distribution with Illiquid Durables. International Finance Discussion Papers 773, Board of Governers of the Federal Reserve System.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Gary D. (1993) The cyclical and secular behavior of the labor input: Comparing efficiency units and hours worked. Journal of Applied Econometrics 8, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, Mark (1996) Wealth distribution in life-cycle economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 38, 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jappelli, Tulio and Pagano, Marco (1994) Saving, growth, and liquidity constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeske, Karsten (2005) Macroeconomic models with heterogeneous agents and housing. FRB Atlanta Economic Review 90 (4), 39–56.Google Scholar
Kennickell, Arthur (2003) A Rolling Tide: Changes in the Distribution of Wealth in the U.S., 1989–2001. SCF working paper, Federal Reserve Board.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, Eddie (2002) A primer for investors in the Korean MBS market. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 8, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Woo and Lee, Seonglim (2001a) Economic crisis and income disparity: Income distribution and poverty before and after the 1997 crisis [in Korean]. International Economic Journal 7 (2), 79–109.Google Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Woo and Lee, Seonglim (2001b) Estimation of wealth inequality in Korea [in Korean]. Journal of Korean Development Economics 7, 1–28.Google Scholar
Ortalo-Magné, Francois and Rady, Sven (2006) Housing market dynamics: On the contribution of income shocks and credit constraints. Review of Economic Studies 73, 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platania, Jennifer and Schlagenhauf, Don E. (2002) Housing and Asset Holding in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model. Mimeo, Florida State University.Google Scholar
Poterba, James M. (1992) Taxation and housing: old questions, new answers. American Economic Review 82 (2), 237–242.Google Scholar
Silos, Pedro (2007) Housing tenure and wealth distribution in life-cycle economies. B.E. Journals in Macroeconomics 7 (Topics), Article 27.Google Scholar
Tauchen, George and Hussey, Robert (1991) Quadrature-based methods for obtaining approximate solutions to nonlinear asset pricing models. Econometrica 59, 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Won, Young-He and Lee, Gary R. (1999) Living arrangements of older parents in Korea. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Fang (2009) Consumption along the life cycle: How different is housing? Review of Economic Dynamics 12 (3), 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar