Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:32:47.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TECHNOLOGY, TRADE, AND GROWTH: THE ROLE OF EDUCATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2015

Klaus Prettner*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematical Methods in Economics, Vienna University of Technology
Holger Strulik
Affiliation:
University of Goettingen
*
Address correspondence to: Klaus Prettner, Institute of Mathematical Methods in Economics, Vienna University of Technology, Argentinierstraße 8/4/105-3, 1040 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

We generalize a trade model with firm-specific heterogeneity and R&D-based growth to allow for endogenous education and fertility. The framework is able to explain cross-country differences in living standards and trade intensities by the differential pace of human capital accumulation among industrialized countries. Consistent with the empirical evidence, scale matters for relative economic prosperity as long as countries are closed, whereas scale does not matter in a fully globalized world. The average human capital of a country, by contrast, influences its relative economic prosperity irrespective of trade-openness.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alesina, Alberto, Spolaore, Enrico, and Wacziarg, Romain T. (2005) Trade, growth and the size of countries. In Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S.N. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1B, pp. 15001542. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Andreoni, James (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy 97, 14471458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J. and Lee, Jong-Wha (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics 104, 184198.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Lewis, Gregg H. (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81, 279288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breton, Theodore R. (2013) Were Mankiw, Romer, and Weil right? A reconciliation of the micro and macro effects of schooling on income. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, 10231054.Google Scholar
Cohen, Daniel and Soto, Marcelo (2007) Growth and human capital: Good data, good results. Journal of Economic Growth 12, 5176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Jonathan and Kortum, Samuel (2001) Technology, trade, and growth: A unified framework. European Economic Review 45, 742755.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded (2005) From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. N. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1A, pp. 171293. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded (2011) Unified Growth Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded and Mountford, Andrew (2006) Trade and the great divergence: The family connection. American Economic Review 96, 299303.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded and Mountford, Andrew (2008) Trading population for productivity: Theory and evidence. Review of Economic Studies 75, 11431179.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded and Weil, David (2000) Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review 90, 806828.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei (2004) Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth 9, 271303.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A. and Woessmann, Ludger (2012) Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of Economic Growth 17, 267321.Google Scholar
Herzer, Dierk, Strulik, Holger, and Vollmer, Sebastian (2012) The long-run determinants of fertility: One century of demographic change 1900–1999. Journal of Economic Growth 17, 357385.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles I. (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103, 759783.Google Scholar
Kortum, Samuel (1997) Research, patenting and technological change. Econometrica 65, 13891419.Google Scholar
Kremer, Michael (1993) Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 681716.Google Scholar
Li, Hongbin and Zhang, Junsen (2007) Do high birth rates hamper economic growth? Review of Economics and Statistics 89, 110117.Google Scholar
Manasse, Paolo and Turrini, Alessandro (2001) Trade, wages, and superstars. Journal of International Economics 54, 97117.Google Scholar
Moav, Omer (2005) Cheap children and the persistence of poverty. Economic Journal 110, 88110.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, 71102.Google Scholar
Strulik, Holger, Prettner, Klaus, and Prskawetz, Alexia (2013) The past and future of knowledge-based growth. Journal of Economic Growth 18, 411437.Google Scholar
Strulik, Holger and Weisdorf, Jacob L. (2008) Population, food, and knowledge: A simple unified growth theory. Journal of Economic Growth 13, 195216.Google Scholar
Strulik, Holger and Weisdorf, Jacob L. (2014) How child costs and survival shaped the Industrial Revolution and the demographic transition. Macroeconomic Dynamics 18, 114144.Google Scholar
United Nations (2011) World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, Population Estimates Section.Google Scholar
World Bank (2014) World Development Indicators & Global Development Finance Database. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators.Google Scholar
Yasui, Daishin (in press) Adult longevity and growth takeoff. Macroeconomic Dynamics.Google Scholar
Yeaple, Stephen R. (2005) A simple model of firm heterogeneity, international trade, and wages. Journal of International Economics 65, 120.Google Scholar