Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:15:56.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SAVINGS, INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSFERS, AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2006

IGNACIO PONCE OCAMPO  and
KAZUHIRO YUKI
IGNACIO PONCE OCAMPO
Affiliation:
Goldman Sachs, London
KAZUHIRO YUKI
Affiliation:
Kyoto University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the quantitative importance of different savings motives on the distributions of wealth and consumption and aggregate capital accumulation by solving an overlapping generations model with intragenerational heterogeneity. Agents differ in age, ability, earnings shocks, and inherited bequests. In the baseline economy, there are uninsurable idiosyncratic risks associated with uncertain lifetime and earnings shocks. The model is calibrated to the U.S. economy and solved numerically. Then the allocations of the baseline economy are compared with those of an economy with complete annuity markets, one without earnings uncertainty, and one without altruism.

Keywords

SavingsIntergenerational TransfersWealth Distribution
Type
ARTICLES
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , June 2006 , pp. 371 - 414
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson Robert N. 1999 United States life tables, 1997. National Vital Statistics Reports 47(28). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics.
Ando Albert and Arthur B. Kennickell 1987 How much (or little) life cycle is there in micro data? The cases of the United States and Japan. In Dornbusch Rudiger, Stanley Fischer, and John Bossons (eds.), Macroeconomics and Finance: Essays in Honor of Franco Modigliani, pp. 159– 223. Cambridge, Mass., and London: MIT Press.
Barro Robert J. 1974 Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82 (6), 1095– 1130.Google Scholar
Becker Gary S. 1974 A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy 82 (6), 1063– 1094.Google Scholar
Blinder Alan 1973 A model of inherited wealth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, 608– 626.Google Scholar
Blinder Alan 1988 Life cycle saving vs. intergenerational transfers: Comments. In Kessler Denis and Andre Masson (eds.), Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, pp. 68– 76. Oxford, New York, Toronto and Melbourne: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Caballero Ricardo J. 1991 Earnings uncertainty and aggregate wealth accumulation. American Economic Review 81, 859– 871.Google Scholar
Cagetti Marco 2003 Wealth accumulation over the life cycle and precautionary savings. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21 (3), 339– 353.Google Scholar
Carroll Christopher D. 1997 Buffer-stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1– 55.Google Scholar
Castaneda Ana, Javier Diaz-Gimenez, and Jose Victor Rios-Rull 2003 Accounting for earnings and wealth inequality. Journal of Political Economy 111 (4), 818– 857.Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office 2001. The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2002–2011.
Deaton Angus 1991 Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica 59, 1221– 1248.Google Scholar
Deaton Angus 1992 Understanding Consumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deaton Angus and Christina Paxson 1994 Intertemporal choice and inequality. Journal of Political Economy 102, 437– 467.Google Scholar
De Nardi Mariacristina 2004 Wealth inequality and intergenerational links. Review of Economic Studies 71 (3), 743– 768.Google Scholar
Diaz-Gimenez Javier, Vicenzo Quadrini, and Jose Victor Rios-Rull 1997 Dimension of inequality: Facts on the U.S. distributions of earnings, income and wealth. Federal Reserve of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 21 (2), 3– 21.Google Scholar
French Eric 2000 The Labor Supply Response to (Mismeasured But) Predictable Wage Changes. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago working paper 2000–08.Google Scholar
Gale William G. and John K. Scholz 1994 Intergenerational transfers and the accumulation of wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4), 145– 160.Google Scholar
Gokhale Jagadeesh, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, James Sefton, and Martin Weale 2001 Simulating the transmission of wealth inequality via bequests. Journal of Public Economics 79 (1), 93– 128.Google Scholar
Gourinchas P-O and J. A. Parker 2002 Consumption over the life cycle. Econometrica 70 (1), 47– 89.Google Scholar
Hendricks Lutz 2002 Intended and Accidental Bequests in a Life-Cycle Economy. Mimeo, Iowa State University.
Hubbard R. Glenn Jonathan S. Skinner, and Stephen P. Zeldes 1994 The importance of precautionary motives in explaining individual and aggregate saving. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 40, 59– 125.Google Scholar
Hubbard R. Glenn, Jonathan S. Skinner, and Stephen P. Zeldes 1995 Precautionary saving and social insurance. Journal of Political Economy 103 (2), 360– 399.Google Scholar
Huggett Mark 1996 Wealth distribution in life-cycle economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 38 (3), 469– 494.Google Scholar
Hurd Micheal D.A. and B. Gabriela Mundaca 1989 The importance of gifts and inheritances among the affluent. In Robert E. Lipsey and Helen Stone Tice (eds.), The Measurement of Saving, Investment and Wealth, pp. 737– 758. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kessler Denis and Andre Masson 1989 Bequest and wealth accumulation: Are some pieces of the puzzle missing? Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (3), 141– 152.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff Laurence J. and Avia Spivak 1981 The family as an incomplete annuities market. Journal of Political Economy 89 (2), 372– 391.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff Laurence J. and Lawrence H. Summers 1981 The role of intergenerational transfers in aggregate capital accumulation. Journal of Political Economy 89 (4), 706– 732.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff Laurence J. 1988 Intergenerational transfers and savings. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (2), 41– 48.Google Scholar
Laitner John. 2001 Wealth Accumulation in the U.S.: Do Inheritances and Bequests Play a Significant Role? Mimeo, University of Michigan.
Lord William and Peter Ranzagas 1991 Savings and wealth in models with altruistic bequests. American Economic Review 81, 289– 296.Google Scholar
Masson Andre 1986 A cohort analysis of age-wealth profiles generated by a simulated model in France (1949–1975). Economic Journal 96, 173– 190.Google Scholar
McGarry Kathleen 1999 Inter vivos transfers and intended bequests. Journal of Public Economics 73, 321– 351.Google Scholar
Mendoza Enrique G., Assaf Razin, and Linda L. Tesar 1994 Effective tax Rates in macroeconomics: Cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 34 (3), 297– 323.Google Scholar
Modigliani Franco 1988 The role of intergenerational transfers and life cycle saving in the accumulation of wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (2), 15– 40.Google Scholar
Mulligan Casey B. 1997 Parental Priorities and Economic Inequality. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Nishiyama Shinichi 2002 Bequests, inter vivos transfers, and wealth distribution. Review of Economic Dynamics 5, 892– 931.Google Scholar
Quadrini Vicenzo and Jose Victor Rios-Rull 1997 Understanding the U.S. distribution of wealth. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 21 (2), 22– 36.Google Scholar
Solon Gary 1992 Intergenerational income mobility in the United States. American Economic Review 82 (3), 393– 408.Google Scholar
Tauchen George 1986 Finite state Markov-chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions. Economic Letters 20, 177– 181.Google Scholar
Yaari Menachem H. 1965 Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer. Review of Economic Studies 32 (2), 137– 150.Google Scholar
Zimmerman David J. 1992 Regression toward mediocrity in economic stature. American Economic Review 82 (3), 409– 429.Google Scholar