Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:25:56.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PATENT PROTECTION, OPTIMAL LICENSING, AND INNOVATION WITH ENDOGENOUS ENTRY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2019

Keishun Suzuki
Keishun Suzuki*
Affiliation:
Chiba University
*
Address correspondence to: Keishun Suzuki, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Chiba University, 1-33, Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +81-43-290-3705.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How does patent policy affect innovation when patent licensing is crucial for firms? To address this question, the present study incorporates voluntary patent licensing between an innovator and followers, as discussed in the literature of industrial organization, into a dynamic general equilibrium model. Unlike previous studies, both the licensing fee and the number of licensees are endogenously determined by the innovator’s maximization and the free-entry condition. Using this model, we show that strong patent protection does not always enhance innovation, economic growth, and welfare. Furthermore, the extended analysis provides the policy implication that the effect of patent policy depends on how difficult further innovation is without patent licensing of the current leading technology.

Keywords

InnovationPatent ProtectionOptimal Patent LicensingEndogenous Market Structure
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 24 , Issue 8 , December 2020 , pp. 2033 - 2059
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Shin Kishimoto, Yuichi Furukawa, an anonymous associate editor, two anonymous referees, all attendees at the 2018 Asian Meeting of the Econometric Society in Korea, the 2018 Spring Meeting of the Japan Economic Association at Hyogo, and the 2018 Annual Meeting of the Association of Southern European Economic Theorists in Florence for their comments and advice. This study is financially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) No.16K17109. All remaining errors are my own.

References

Arora, A. and M., Ceccagnoli (2006) Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing. Management Science 52(2), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. S. (2017) Endogenous market structure and technology licensing. The Japanese Economic Review 68(1), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J. P. (2002) A dynamic analysis of licensing: The “boomerang” effect and grant-back clauses. International Economic Review 43(3), 803–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. C. (2009) Effects of blocking patents on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economic Growth 14(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G. and Galli, S. (2012) Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation? European Economic Review 56(4), 727–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. C., Furukawa, Y. and Ji, L. (2016) Patents, R&D subsidies, and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy. Southern Economic Journal 82(3), 809–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. C. and Pan, S. (2013) The escape-infringement effect of blocking patents on innovation and economic growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17(4), 955–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chugh, S. K. and Ghironi, F. (2018) Optimal Fiscal Policy with Endogenous Product Variety. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Cysne, R. P. and Turchick, D. (2012) “Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth revisited. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 36(6), 851–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etro, F. (2007) Competition, Innovation, and Antitrust. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Etro, F. (2009) Endogenous Market Structures and Business Cycles. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furukawa, Y. (2007) The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31(11), 3644–3670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futagami, K. and Iwaisako, T. (2007) Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory 132(1), 306–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991) Chapter 4, Rising product quality. In: Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (eds.), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, (pp. 84–111). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamano, M. and Zanetti, F. (2017) Endogenous product turnover and macroeconomic dynamics. Review of Economic Dynamics 26, 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamano, M. and Zanetti, F. (2018) On quality and variety bias in aggregate prices. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 50(6), 1343–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horii, R. and Iwaisako, T. (2007) Economic growth with imperfect protection of intellectual property rights. Journal of Economics 90(1), 45–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwaisako, T. (2016) Effects of patent protection on optimal corporate income and consumption taxes in an R&D-based growth model. Southern Economic Journal 83(2), 590–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwaisako, T. and Futagami, K. (2003) Patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economics 78(3), 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamien, M. I. and Tauman, Y. (1986) Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(3), 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, T., Masuda, Y. and Umezawa, M. (2014) Patent strength and optimal two-part tariff licensing with a potential rival. Economics Letters 123(2), 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, G. and Whinston, D. (1986) Free entry and social inefficiency. The RAND Journal of Economics 17(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsiglio, S. and Tolotti, M. (2015) Endogenous growth and technological progress with innovation driven by social interactions. Economic Theory, 1–36.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A. and Mukherjee, S. (2008) Excess-entry theorem: The implications of licensing. The Manchester School 76(6), 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muto, S. (1993) On licensing policies in Bertrand competition. Games and Economic Behavior 5(2), 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’donoghue, T. and Zweimüller, J. (2004) Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9(1), 81–123.Google Scholar
Qian, Y. (2007) Do national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection, 1978-2002. The Review of Economics and Statistics 89(3), 436–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, C. A. (2009) Measuring payments for the supply and use of intellectual property. In: Reinsdorf, M. B. and Slaughter, M. J. (eds.), International Trade in Services and Intangibles in the Era of Globalization (pp. 139–171). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockett, K. E. (1990) Choosing the competition and patent licensing. The RAND Journal of Economics 21(1), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakakibara, M. and Branstetter, L. (2001) Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms. The RAND Journal of Economics 32(1), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, D. and Stamatopoulos, G. (2009) Drastic innovations and multiplicity of optimal licensing policies. Economics Letters 105(1), 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, D. and Tauman, Y. (2007) General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation. Games and Economic Behavior 59(1), 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D., Sen and Tauman, Y. (2018) Patent licensing in a Cournot oligopoly: General results. Mathematical Social Sciences 96, 37–48.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K. (2015) Economic growth under two forms of intellectual property rights protection: Patents and trade secrets. Journal of Economics 115(1), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, K. (2017) Competition, Patent Protection, and Innovation in an Endogenous Market Structure. MPRA Paper.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. A. and Rushing, F. W. (1996) An empirical analysis of the impact of patent protection on economic growth. Journal of Economic Development 21(2), 61–79.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Zhou, Z. and Li-Ying, J. (2013) The impact of licensed-knowledge attributes on the innovation performance of licensee firms: Evidence from the Chinese electronic industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer 38(5), 699–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar